Legal Realism: In Search of a Science of law

Henrik Palmer Olsen, Stuart Toddington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Legal Realism is a critique of Legal Formalism’s account of how legal validity emerges from the process of adjudication. Formalism sees legal validity as a product of the self-sufficiency of doctrinal materials interpreted in the light of a unique form of normative logic – Legal Reasoning. Realism is right to resist this formalistic introversion, but in its desire to range substance and content against the circularity of formalism, contemporary Realism has confused the tangible and the actual with the essential and the real. The critical rejection of formalism, however, calls for even greater conceptual and theoretical effort than
before, not an ultra-positivistic abrogation of critique that acknowledges only the empirical as scientific subject matter. Legal Realism’s critique of Formalism cannot be coherently or relevantly configured methodologically as an amalgamation of Legal Positivism and Logical Empiricism. Rather, we argue that only when an empirical inquiry into legal phenomena is combined with an ethically informed verstehende sociology can we break the circle of formalism and establish legal theory as a science of legal validity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages22-37
Number of pages16
JournalRetfaerd
Volume39
Issue number155/4
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

legal validity
realism
Law
science
right to resist
legal positivism
introversion
legal theory
empiricism
self-sufficiency
sociology

Cite this

Olsen, H. P., & Toddington, S. (2016). Legal Realism: In Search of a Science of law. Retfaerd, 39(155/4), 22-37.
Olsen, Henrik Palmer ; Toddington, Stuart. / Legal Realism : In Search of a Science of law. In: Retfaerd. 2016 ; Vol. 39, No. 155/4. pp. 22-37.
@article{7bfb08338b2d4c6e98eabd32908683ca,
title = "Legal Realism: In Search of a Science of law",
abstract = "Legal Realism is a critique of Legal Formalism’s account of how legal validity emerges from the process of adjudication. Formalism sees legal validity as a product of the self-sufficiency of doctrinal materials interpreted in the light of a unique form of normative logic – Legal Reasoning. Realism is right to resist this formalistic introversion, but in its desire to range substance and content against the circularity of formalism, contemporary Realism has confused the tangible and the actual with the essential and the real. The critical rejection of formalism, however, calls for even greater conceptual and theoretical effort thanbefore, not an ultra-positivistic abrogation of critique that acknowledges only the empirical as scientific subject matter. Legal Realism’s critique of Formalism cannot be coherently or relevantly configured methodologically as an amalgamation of Legal Positivism and Logical Empiricism. Rather, we argue that only when an empirical inquiry into legal phenomena is combined with an ethically informed verstehende sociology can we break the circle of formalism and establish legal theory as a science of legal validity.",
keywords = "Legal realism, Logical empiricism, Legal idealism, Alf Ross, New legal realism, Max Weber, Legal validity, Formalism, American Legal Realism, Rational Causation, Methodology, Concept-Formation, Epistemology, Validity, Verstehen, Law jobs, K.N. Llewellyn",
author = "Olsen, {Henrik Palmer} and Stuart Toddington",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "21",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "22--37",
journal = "Retfaerd",
issn = "0105-1121",
number = "155/4",

}

Olsen, HP & Toddington, S 2016, 'Legal Realism: In Search of a Science of law', Retfaerd, vol. 39, no. 155/4, pp. 22-37.

Legal Realism : In Search of a Science of law. / Olsen, Henrik Palmer; Toddington, Stuart.

In: Retfaerd, Vol. 39, No. 155/4, 21.12.2016, p. 22-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal Realism

T2 - Retfaerd

AU - Olsen, Henrik Palmer

AU - Toddington, Stuart

PY - 2016/12/21

Y1 - 2016/12/21

N2 - Legal Realism is a critique of Legal Formalism’s account of how legal validity emerges from the process of adjudication. Formalism sees legal validity as a product of the self-sufficiency of doctrinal materials interpreted in the light of a unique form of normative logic – Legal Reasoning. Realism is right to resist this formalistic introversion, but in its desire to range substance and content against the circularity of formalism, contemporary Realism has confused the tangible and the actual with the essential and the real. The critical rejection of formalism, however, calls for even greater conceptual and theoretical effort thanbefore, not an ultra-positivistic abrogation of critique that acknowledges only the empirical as scientific subject matter. Legal Realism’s critique of Formalism cannot be coherently or relevantly configured methodologically as an amalgamation of Legal Positivism and Logical Empiricism. Rather, we argue that only when an empirical inquiry into legal phenomena is combined with an ethically informed verstehende sociology can we break the circle of formalism and establish legal theory as a science of legal validity.

AB - Legal Realism is a critique of Legal Formalism’s account of how legal validity emerges from the process of adjudication. Formalism sees legal validity as a product of the self-sufficiency of doctrinal materials interpreted in the light of a unique form of normative logic – Legal Reasoning. Realism is right to resist this formalistic introversion, but in its desire to range substance and content against the circularity of formalism, contemporary Realism has confused the tangible and the actual with the essential and the real. The critical rejection of formalism, however, calls for even greater conceptual and theoretical effort thanbefore, not an ultra-positivistic abrogation of critique that acknowledges only the empirical as scientific subject matter. Legal Realism’s critique of Formalism cannot be coherently or relevantly configured methodologically as an amalgamation of Legal Positivism and Logical Empiricism. Rather, we argue that only when an empirical inquiry into legal phenomena is combined with an ethically informed verstehende sociology can we break the circle of formalism and establish legal theory as a science of legal validity.

KW - Legal realism

KW - Logical empiricism

KW - Legal idealism

KW - Alf Ross

KW - New legal realism

KW - Max Weber

KW - Legal validity

KW - Formalism

KW - American Legal Realism

KW - Rational Causation

KW - Methodology

KW - Concept-Formation

KW - Epistemology

KW - Validity

KW - Verstehen

KW - Law jobs

KW - K.N. Llewellyn

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 22

EP - 37

JO - Retfaerd

JF - Retfaerd

SN - 0105-1121

IS - 155/4

ER -

Olsen HP, Toddington S. Legal Realism: In Search of a Science of law. Retfaerd. 2016 Dec 21;39(155/4):22-37.