Projects per year
Abstract
Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Legal Knowledge and Information - JURIX 2018 |
Subtitle of host publication | 31st Annual Conference |
Editors | Monica Palmirani |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 31-40 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781614999348 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Event | The 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - Het Kasteel, Groningen, Netherlands Duration: 12 Dec 2018 → 14 Dec 2018 Conference number: 31 http://jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/ (Link to Conference Website) |
Publication series
Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
---|---|
Volume | 313 |
ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
Conference
Conference | The 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | JURIX 2018 |
Country | Netherlands |
City | Groningen |
Period | 12/12/18 → 14/12/18 |
Internet address |
|
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice: A Critical Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
MIREL: MIning and REasoning with Legal texts
Antoniou, G., Vallati, M., Tachmazidis, I., Mantle, M. & Bargiannis, G.
1/01/16 → 31/12/19
Project: Research