Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice: A Critical Comparison

Sotirios Batsakis, George Baryannis, Guido Governatori, Ilias Tachmazidis, Grigoris Antoniou

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal Knowledge and Information - JURIX 2018
Subtitle of host publication31st Annual Conference
EditorsMonica Palmirani
PublisherIOS Press
Pages31-40
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781614999348
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventThe 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - Het Kasteel, Groningen, Netherlands
Duration: 12 Dec 2018 → 14 Dec 2018
Conference number: 31
http://jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/ (Link to Conference Website)

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume313
ISSN (Print)0922-6389

Conference

ConferenceThe 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
Abbreviated titleJURIX 2018
CountryNetherlands
CityGroningen
Period12/12/18 → 14/12/18
Internet address

Access to Document

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice: A Critical Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this