Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Legal Knowledge and Information - JURIX 2018 |
| Subtitle of host publication | 31st Annual Conference |
| Editors | Monica Palmirani |
| Publisher | IOS Press |
| Pages | 31-40 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781614999348 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Event | The 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - Het Kasteel, Groningen, Netherlands Duration: 12 Dec 2018 → 14 Dec 2018 Conference number: 31 http://jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/ (Link to Conference Website) |
Publication series
| Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
|---|---|
| Volume | 313 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
Conference
| Conference | The 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | JURIX 2018 |
| Country | Netherlands |
| City | Groningen |
| Period | 12/12/18 → 14/12/18 |
| Internet address |
|
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice : A Critical Comparison. / Batsakis, Sotirios; Baryannis, George; Governatori, Guido; Tachmazidis, Ilias; Antoniou, Grigoris.
Legal Knowledge and Information - JURIX 2018: 31st Annual Conference. ed. / Monica Palmirani. IOS Press, 2018. p. 31-40 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 313).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
TY - GEN
T1 - Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice
T2 - A Critical Comparison
AU - Batsakis, Sotirios
AU - Baryannis, George
AU - Governatori, Guido
AU - Tachmazidis, Ilias
AU - Antoniou, Grigoris
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.
AB - Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.
KW - Legal knowledge representation
KW - Legal reasoning
KW - Normative reasoning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059635121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31
DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
SP - 31
EP - 40
BT - Legal Knowledge and Information - JURIX 2018
A2 - Palmirani, Monica
PB - IOS Press
ER -