Legislating to Give Effect to Precedent Autonomy

Comparative reflections on Legislative Incompetence

Samantha Halliday

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article considers the legislative responses to the perceived need to provide for the binding force of precedent autonomy in Austria, Germany and England. It reflects comparatively upon the impact of these responses in considering to what extent it is possible to make an anticipatory refusal of consent to medical treatment that will bind healthcare professionals, as opposed to being merely a factor to be considered in determining the patient’s best interests or presumed will. It concludes that each of the three legislatures has introduced significant hurdles to the creation of a binding anticipatory decision, ensuring that medical discretion and the presumption in favour of life will be preserved in the majority of cases, and in so doing undermines the very concept of precedent autonomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-171
Number of pages45
JournalMedical Law International
Volume11
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jun 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

autonomy
physician's care
Austria

Cite this

@article{35ab77e1df8f401daed5726f7a60ed31,
title = "Legislating to Give Effect to Precedent Autonomy: Comparative reflections on Legislative Incompetence",
abstract = "This article considers the legislative responses to the perceived need to provide for the binding force of precedent autonomy in Austria, Germany and England. It reflects comparatively upon the impact of these responses in considering to what extent it is possible to make an anticipatory refusal of consent to medical treatment that will bind healthcare professionals, as opposed to being merely a factor to be considered in determining the patient’s best interests or presumed will. It concludes that each of the three legislatures has introduced significant hurdles to the creation of a binding anticipatory decision, ensuring that medical discretion and the presumption in favour of life will be preserved in the majority of cases, and in so doing undermines the very concept of precedent autonomy.",
keywords = "autonomy, precedent autonomy, anticipatory decision, advance decision, advance directive, Mental Capacity Act",
author = "Samantha Halliday",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/096853321101100202",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "127--171",
journal = "Medical Law International",
issn = "0968-5332",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "2",

}

Legislating to Give Effect to Precedent Autonomy : Comparative reflections on Legislative Incompetence. / Halliday, Samantha.

In: Medical Law International, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2011, p. 127-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legislating to Give Effect to Precedent Autonomy

T2 - Comparative reflections on Legislative Incompetence

AU - Halliday, Samantha

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article considers the legislative responses to the perceived need to provide for the binding force of precedent autonomy in Austria, Germany and England. It reflects comparatively upon the impact of these responses in considering to what extent it is possible to make an anticipatory refusal of consent to medical treatment that will bind healthcare professionals, as opposed to being merely a factor to be considered in determining the patient’s best interests or presumed will. It concludes that each of the three legislatures has introduced significant hurdles to the creation of a binding anticipatory decision, ensuring that medical discretion and the presumption in favour of life will be preserved in the majority of cases, and in so doing undermines the very concept of precedent autonomy.

AB - This article considers the legislative responses to the perceived need to provide for the binding force of precedent autonomy in Austria, Germany and England. It reflects comparatively upon the impact of these responses in considering to what extent it is possible to make an anticipatory refusal of consent to medical treatment that will bind healthcare professionals, as opposed to being merely a factor to be considered in determining the patient’s best interests or presumed will. It concludes that each of the three legislatures has introduced significant hurdles to the creation of a binding anticipatory decision, ensuring that medical discretion and the presumption in favour of life will be preserved in the majority of cases, and in so doing undermines the very concept of precedent autonomy.

KW - autonomy

KW - precedent autonomy

KW - anticipatory decision

KW - advance decision

KW - advance directive

KW - Mental Capacity Act

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mli

U2 - 10.1177/096853321101100202

DO - 10.1177/096853321101100202

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 127

EP - 171

JO - Medical Law International

JF - Medical Law International

SN - 0968-5332

IS - 2

ER -