Let’s stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of ‘child protection’

Brid Featherstone, Anna Gupta, Kate Morris, Joanne Warner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores how the child protection system currently operates in England. It analyses how policy and practice has developed, and articulates the need for an alternative approach. It draws from the social model as applied in the fields of disability and mental health, to begin to sketch out more hopeful and progressive possibilities for children, families and communities. The social model specifically draws attention to the economic, environmental and cultural barriers faced by people with differing levels of (dis)ability, but has not been used to think about ‘child protection’, an area of work in England that is dominated by a focus on risk and risk aversion. This area has paid limited attention to the barriers to ensuring children and young people are cared for safely within families and communities, and the social determinants of much of the harms they experience have not been recognised because of the focus on individualised risk factors.
LanguageEnglish
Pages7-22
Number of pages16
JournalFamilies, Relationships and Societies
Volume7
Issue number1
Early online date15 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

child protection
community
disability
mental health
determinants
ability
economics
experience

Cite this

@article{619e17985d7647788d43168b811af8a7,
title = "Let’s stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of ‘child protection’",
abstract = "This article explores how the child protection system currently operates in England. It analyses how policy and practice has developed, and articulates the need for an alternative approach. It draws from the social model as applied in the fields of disability and mental health, to begin to sketch out more hopeful and progressive possibilities for children, families and communities. The social model specifically draws attention to the economic, environmental and cultural barriers faced by people with differing levels of (dis)ability, but has not been used to think about ‘child protection’, an area of work in England that is dominated by a focus on risk and risk aversion. This area has paid limited attention to the barriers to ensuring children and young people are cared for safely within families and communities, and the social determinants of much of the harms they experience have not been recognised because of the focus on individualised risk factors.",
keywords = "Child protection, Risk, Social model, Parenting",
author = "Brid Featherstone and Anna Gupta and Kate Morris and Joanne Warner",
note = "Dates taken from Eprints HN 06/09/2017",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1332/204674316X14552878034622",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "7--22",
journal = "Families, Relationships and Societies",
issn = "2046-7435",
publisher = "The Policy Press",
number = "1",

}

Let’s stop feeding the risk monster : Towards a social model of ‘child protection’. / Featherstone, Brid; Gupta, Anna; Morris, Kate; Warner, Joanne.

In: Families, Relationships and Societies, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 7-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Let’s stop feeding the risk monster

T2 - Families, Relationships and Societies

AU - Featherstone, Brid

AU - Gupta, Anna

AU - Morris, Kate

AU - Warner, Joanne

N1 - Dates taken from Eprints HN 06/09/2017

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This article explores how the child protection system currently operates in England. It analyses how policy and practice has developed, and articulates the need for an alternative approach. It draws from the social model as applied in the fields of disability and mental health, to begin to sketch out more hopeful and progressive possibilities for children, families and communities. The social model specifically draws attention to the economic, environmental and cultural barriers faced by people with differing levels of (dis)ability, but has not been used to think about ‘child protection’, an area of work in England that is dominated by a focus on risk and risk aversion. This area has paid limited attention to the barriers to ensuring children and young people are cared for safely within families and communities, and the social determinants of much of the harms they experience have not been recognised because of the focus on individualised risk factors.

AB - This article explores how the child protection system currently operates in England. It analyses how policy and practice has developed, and articulates the need for an alternative approach. It draws from the social model as applied in the fields of disability and mental health, to begin to sketch out more hopeful and progressive possibilities for children, families and communities. The social model specifically draws attention to the economic, environmental and cultural barriers faced by people with differing levels of (dis)ability, but has not been used to think about ‘child protection’, an area of work in England that is dominated by a focus on risk and risk aversion. This area has paid limited attention to the barriers to ensuring children and young people are cared for safely within families and communities, and the social determinants of much of the harms they experience have not been recognised because of the focus on individualised risk factors.

KW - Child protection

KW - Risk

KW - Social model

KW - Parenting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046551214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1332/204674316X14552878034622

DO - 10.1332/204674316X14552878034622

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 7

EP - 22

JO - Families, Relationships and Societies

JF - Families, Relationships and Societies

SN - 2046-7435

IS - 1

ER -