Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leveraging known Pacific colonisation times to test models for the ancestry of Southeast Asians

Mafalda Almeida, Francesca Gandini, Teresa Rito, M. George Foody, Andreia Brandão, Marisa Oliveira, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Fichera, Gonzalo Oteo-Garcia, Zafarina Zainuddin, Ken Khong Eng, William Pomat, Jarosław Bryk, Luísa Pereira, Helen Farr, Maria Pala, Stephen J. Oppenheimer, Martin B. Richards, Pedro Soares

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The most widely accepted model for the colonization of Remote Oceania by Austronesian-speaking bearers of the Lapita complex ~ 3 ka (3000 years ago) links it to a broader Neolithic expansion from China, via Taiwan, ~ 4.5–6 ka. However, analyses of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup B4a1a1a, prevalent among Remote Oceanians today, have both supported and challenged this scenario. Here, we analyze 1364 B4a1a1 mitogenomes (234 novel) from 68 islands and compare age estimates with radiocarbon dates for colonization. We estimate the settlement of Remote Oceania ~ 3.2 [2.7; 3.75] ka, matching radiocarbon ages, and then extrapolate the age in Near Oceania. B4a1a1a arose around the northern coasts of New Guinea at least 6 ka, following Early Holocene dispersals from Asia. Technological advances (e.g., in sailing), fueled by interaction networks alongside the arrival of Late Holocene migrants from Taiwan or ISEA and putative environmental changes, likely triggered the expansion of Lapita colonists carrying B4a1a1a from New Guinea into Remote Oceania.

Original languageEnglish
Article number37044
Number of pages17
JournalScientific Reports
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date23 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leveraging known Pacific colonisation times to test models for the ancestry of Southeast Asians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this