Litter, gender and brand: The anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence

Dominic Medway, Cathy Parker, Stuart Roper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper isolates litter as a physical incivility in a film-based experiment, demonstrating the impact of litter on participants' anticipation of a wide range of both physical and social incivilities, and on their perceptions of crime prevalence. Such relationships have not previously been examined, partly because litter has rarely been the focus of earlier studies on incivilities. This paper also tests for possible interaction effects in these relationships involving gender (finding no significant interaction), as well as examining whether there is a difference in the anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence between participants exposed to branded as opposed to unbranded litter (finding no difference between the two groups). Litter is often viewed as a tolerable nuisance and not always treated as a priority. This study suggests prioritising funds towards more targeted interventions to reduce litter might result in some ‘quick wins’ – most notably, reducing perceptions of crime prevalence.
LanguageEnglish
Pages135-144
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume45
Early online date18 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crime
Financial Management

Cite this

@article{d905ad8a39974e4f90c328b0dc5172cd,
title = "Litter, gender and brand: The anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence",
abstract = "This paper isolates litter as a physical incivility in a film-based experiment, demonstrating the impact of litter on participants' anticipation of a wide range of both physical and social incivilities, and on their perceptions of crime prevalence. Such relationships have not previously been examined, partly because litter has rarely been the focus of earlier studies on incivilities. This paper also tests for possible interaction effects in these relationships involving gender (finding no significant interaction), as well as examining whether there is a difference in the anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence between participants exposed to branded as opposed to unbranded litter (finding no difference between the two groups). Litter is often viewed as a tolerable nuisance and not always treated as a priority. This study suggests prioritising funds towards more targeted interventions to reduce litter might result in some ‘quick wins’ – most notably, reducing perceptions of crime prevalence.",
keywords = "Litter, Incivilities, Perceptions of crime, Gender, Brand, Packaging, Experiment",
author = "Dominic Medway and Cathy Parker and Stuart Roper",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "135--144",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4944",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Litter, gender and brand : The anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence. / Medway, Dominic; Parker, Cathy; Roper, Stuart.

In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 45, 01.03.2016, p. 135-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Litter, gender and brand

T2 - Journal of Environmental Psychology

AU - Medway, Dominic

AU - Parker, Cathy

AU - Roper, Stuart

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - This paper isolates litter as a physical incivility in a film-based experiment, demonstrating the impact of litter on participants' anticipation of a wide range of both physical and social incivilities, and on their perceptions of crime prevalence. Such relationships have not previously been examined, partly because litter has rarely been the focus of earlier studies on incivilities. This paper also tests for possible interaction effects in these relationships involving gender (finding no significant interaction), as well as examining whether there is a difference in the anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence between participants exposed to branded as opposed to unbranded litter (finding no difference between the two groups). Litter is often viewed as a tolerable nuisance and not always treated as a priority. This study suggests prioritising funds towards more targeted interventions to reduce litter might result in some ‘quick wins’ – most notably, reducing perceptions of crime prevalence.

AB - This paper isolates litter as a physical incivility in a film-based experiment, demonstrating the impact of litter on participants' anticipation of a wide range of both physical and social incivilities, and on their perceptions of crime prevalence. Such relationships have not previously been examined, partly because litter has rarely been the focus of earlier studies on incivilities. This paper also tests for possible interaction effects in these relationships involving gender (finding no significant interaction), as well as examining whether there is a difference in the anticipation of incivilities and perceptions of crime prevalence between participants exposed to branded as opposed to unbranded litter (finding no difference between the two groups). Litter is often viewed as a tolerable nuisance and not always treated as a priority. This study suggests prioritising funds towards more targeted interventions to reduce litter might result in some ‘quick wins’ – most notably, reducing perceptions of crime prevalence.

KW - Litter

KW - Incivilities

KW - Perceptions of crime

KW - Gender

KW - Brand

KW - Packaging

KW - Experiment

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 135

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology

SN - 0272-4944

ER -