Losing our grip on death: What now for assisted dying in the UK?

Nataly Papadopoulou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent developments on assisted dying in England and Wales are a unique opportunity to engage academics, healthcare professionals, and the public in a fresh round of debate on one of the most controversial subjects of modern times. Assisted dying is currently topical worldwide, with California in the US (2015), Canada (2016), Colorado in the US (2016), and the District of Columbia in the US (2017), recently enacting legislation on physician-assisted dying. Between 2010 and 2015 significant developments also took place in England and Wales, though not leading to legalisation. This article engages in a discussion and evaluation of these developments, namely, the establishment of the Commission on Assisted Dying in 2010 and the publication of its Report in 2012, the ground-breaking Supreme Court case of Nicklinson in 2014, and the Private Members' Bill, the Assisted Dying Bill (2013-2015). In particular, although the Bill's progress was significant, the UK's Parliament and the government were again reluctant and failed to use the Bill as an opportunity to deal with difficult questions. In an area of conflicting societal and individual interests and of great importance for medicine, ethics, and law, this article suggests that a balance between the 'protection' of 'vulnerable' groups potentially affected by the legalisation of assisted dying, and 'choice' in the context of life-expectancy should be considered in future reform.
LanguageEnglish
Pages57-79
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE)
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dying
death
bill
legalization
modern times
life expectancy
parliament
Supreme Court
legislation
moral philosophy
physician
medicine
Canada
district
reform
Law
evaluation
Group

Cite this

@article{b57533ae836e42999314aabd03d8c315,
title = "Losing our grip on death: What now for assisted dying in the UK?",
abstract = "Recent developments on assisted dying in England and Wales are a unique opportunity to engage academics, healthcare professionals, and the public in a fresh round of debate on one of the most controversial subjects of modern times. Assisted dying is currently topical worldwide, with California in the US (2015), Canada (2016), Colorado in the US (2016), and the District of Columbia in the US (2017), recently enacting legislation on physician-assisted dying. Between 2010 and 2015 significant developments also took place in England and Wales, though not leading to legalisation. This article engages in a discussion and evaluation of these developments, namely, the establishment of the Commission on Assisted Dying in 2010 and the publication of its Report in 2012, the ground-breaking Supreme Court case of Nicklinson in 2014, and the Private Members' Bill, the Assisted Dying Bill (2013-2015). In particular, although the Bill's progress was significant, the UK's Parliament and the government were again reluctant and failed to use the Bill as an opportunity to deal with difficult questions. In an area of conflicting societal and individual interests and of great importance for medicine, ethics, and law, this article suggests that a balance between the 'protection' of 'vulnerable' groups potentially affected by the legalisation of assisted dying, and 'choice' in the context of life-expectancy should be considered in future reform.",
author = "Nataly Papadopoulou",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7590/221354017X14901892827419",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "57--79",
journal = "Journal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE)",
issn = "2213-5405",
number = "1",

}

Losing our grip on death : What now for assisted dying in the UK? / Papadopoulou, Nataly.

In: Journal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE), Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 57-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Losing our grip on death

T2 - Journal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE)

AU - Papadopoulou, Nataly

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Recent developments on assisted dying in England and Wales are a unique opportunity to engage academics, healthcare professionals, and the public in a fresh round of debate on one of the most controversial subjects of modern times. Assisted dying is currently topical worldwide, with California in the US (2015), Canada (2016), Colorado in the US (2016), and the District of Columbia in the US (2017), recently enacting legislation on physician-assisted dying. Between 2010 and 2015 significant developments also took place in England and Wales, though not leading to legalisation. This article engages in a discussion and evaluation of these developments, namely, the establishment of the Commission on Assisted Dying in 2010 and the publication of its Report in 2012, the ground-breaking Supreme Court case of Nicklinson in 2014, and the Private Members' Bill, the Assisted Dying Bill (2013-2015). In particular, although the Bill's progress was significant, the UK's Parliament and the government were again reluctant and failed to use the Bill as an opportunity to deal with difficult questions. In an area of conflicting societal and individual interests and of great importance for medicine, ethics, and law, this article suggests that a balance between the 'protection' of 'vulnerable' groups potentially affected by the legalisation of assisted dying, and 'choice' in the context of life-expectancy should be considered in future reform.

AB - Recent developments on assisted dying in England and Wales are a unique opportunity to engage academics, healthcare professionals, and the public in a fresh round of debate on one of the most controversial subjects of modern times. Assisted dying is currently topical worldwide, with California in the US (2015), Canada (2016), Colorado in the US (2016), and the District of Columbia in the US (2017), recently enacting legislation on physician-assisted dying. Between 2010 and 2015 significant developments also took place in England and Wales, though not leading to legalisation. This article engages in a discussion and evaluation of these developments, namely, the establishment of the Commission on Assisted Dying in 2010 and the publication of its Report in 2012, the ground-breaking Supreme Court case of Nicklinson in 2014, and the Private Members' Bill, the Assisted Dying Bill (2013-2015). In particular, although the Bill's progress was significant, the UK's Parliament and the government were again reluctant and failed to use the Bill as an opportunity to deal with difficult questions. In an area of conflicting societal and individual interests and of great importance for medicine, ethics, and law, this article suggests that a balance between the 'protection' of 'vulnerable' groups potentially affected by the legalisation of assisted dying, and 'choice' in the context of life-expectancy should be considered in future reform.

U2 - 10.7590/221354017X14901892827419

DO - 10.7590/221354017X14901892827419

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 57

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE)

JF - Journal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE)

SN - 2213-5405

IS - 1

ER -