TY - JOUR
T1 - Loss of doctor-to-doctor communication
T2 - Lessons from the reconfiguration of mental health services in England
AU - Chew-Graham, Carolyn
AU - Slade, Mike
AU - McCrorie, Carolyn
AU - Stewart, Mairi
AU - Gask, Linda
N1 - PMID: 18325150
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - Objective To explore the tensions across the primary-secondary interface when referral from primary care is to a team and to inform service developments in other specialties. Methods A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of primary care and Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) in Croydon and Manchester, UK. For the qualitative study, interviews were carried out with general practitioners (GPs), psychiatrists and managers or clinical leads of the CMHTs. Results GPs described the need for access to specialist knowledge, which they perceived to lie with the psychiatrist, and referral to a team was not perceived to allow this access. A personal threshold was identified by GPs after which they referred the patient to secondary care. CMHTs and psychiatrists recognized that this personal threshold differed between GPs, but their criteria for accepting referrals did not seem to allow for a flexible response to referral requests, leading to the referral being labelled as ‘inappropriate’. The lack of direct doctor-to-doctor communication was perceived by respondents to contribute to a fragmentation of patient care. Strategies were described whereby the system was bypassed to achieve doctor-to-doctor communication, which undermined the team. Conclusions Development of intermediate or ‘Tier 2’ services beyond the mental health services, where the GP refers to a team rather than to a specialist (hospital consultant) could benefit from reflecting on experiences with mental health services. There is a danger that new community services for the physically ill will engender the same level of confusion and discontent described by GPs and other health professionals in this study who are concerned with mental health care. Flexibility is needed within care pathways, including the provision of direct doctor-to-doctor communication together with approaches to minimize the marginalization of non-medical professionals.
AB - Objective To explore the tensions across the primary-secondary interface when referral from primary care is to a team and to inform service developments in other specialties. Methods A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of primary care and Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) in Croydon and Manchester, UK. For the qualitative study, interviews were carried out with general practitioners (GPs), psychiatrists and managers or clinical leads of the CMHTs. Results GPs described the need for access to specialist knowledge, which they perceived to lie with the psychiatrist, and referral to a team was not perceived to allow this access. A personal threshold was identified by GPs after which they referred the patient to secondary care. CMHTs and psychiatrists recognized that this personal threshold differed between GPs, but their criteria for accepting referrals did not seem to allow for a flexible response to referral requests, leading to the referral being labelled as ‘inappropriate’. The lack of direct doctor-to-doctor communication was perceived by respondents to contribute to a fragmentation of patient care. Strategies were described whereby the system was bypassed to achieve doctor-to-doctor communication, which undermined the team. Conclusions Development of intermediate or ‘Tier 2’ services beyond the mental health services, where the GP refers to a team rather than to a specialist (hospital consultant) could benefit from reflecting on experiences with mental health services. There is a danger that new community services for the physically ill will engender the same level of confusion and discontent described by GPs and other health professionals in this study who are concerned with mental health care. Flexibility is needed within care pathways, including the provision of direct doctor-to-doctor communication together with approaches to minimize the marginalization of non-medical professionals.
KW - mental health
KW - communication
KW - health professional
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41649101034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006053
DO - 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006053
M3 - Article
VL - 13
SP - 6
EP - 12
JO - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
JF - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
SN - 1355-8196
IS - 1
ER -