Macroinvertebrate taxonomic and functional trait compositions within lotic habitats affected by river restoration practices

James White, Matthew Hill, Melanie Bickerton, Paul Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The widespread degradation of lotic ecosystems has prompted extensive river restoration efforts globally, but many studies have reported modest ecological responses to rehabilitation practices. The functional properties of biotic communities are rarely examined within post-project appraisals, which would provide more ecological information underpinning ecosystem responses to restoration practices and potentially pinpoint project limitations. This study examines macroinvertebrate community responses to three projects which aimed to physically restore channel morphologies. Taxonomic and functional trait compositions supported by widely occurring lotic habitats (biotopes) were examined across paired restored and non-restored (control) reaches. The multivariate location (average community composition) of taxonomic and functional trait compositions differed marginally between control and restored reaches. However, changes in the amount of multivariate dispersion were more robust and indicated greater ecological heterogeneity within restored reaches, particularly when considering functional trait compositions. Organic biotopes (macrophyte stands and macroalgae) occurred widely across all study sites and supported a high alpha (within-habitat) taxonomic diversity compared to mineralogical biotopes (sand and gravel patches), which were characteristic of restored reaches. However, mineralogical biotopes possessed a higher beta (between-habitat) functional diversity, although this was less pronounced for taxonomic compositions. This study demonstrates that examining the functional and structural properties of taxa across distinct biotopes can provide a greater understanding of biotic responses to river restoration works. Such information could be used to better understand the ecological implications of rehabilitation practices and guide more effective management strategies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages513-525
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume60
Issue number3
Early online date17 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

biotope
macroinvertebrate
Restoration
Rivers
habitat
Chemical analysis
river
Patient rehabilitation
Ecosystems
channel morphology
ecosystem response
community response
Gravel
sand and gravel
macrophyte
community composition
Structural properties
Sand
restoration
Degradation

Cite this

@article{ba4776dbed2a4f48b6f79a4c9407e74f,
title = "Macroinvertebrate taxonomic and functional trait compositions within lotic habitats affected by river restoration practices",
abstract = "The widespread degradation of lotic ecosystems has prompted extensive river restoration efforts globally, but many studies have reported modest ecological responses to rehabilitation practices. The functional properties of biotic communities are rarely examined within post-project appraisals, which would provide more ecological information underpinning ecosystem responses to restoration practices and potentially pinpoint project limitations. This study examines macroinvertebrate community responses to three projects which aimed to physically restore channel morphologies. Taxonomic and functional trait compositions supported by widely occurring lotic habitats (biotopes) were examined across paired restored and non-restored (control) reaches. The multivariate location (average community composition) of taxonomic and functional trait compositions differed marginally between control and restored reaches. However, changes in the amount of multivariate dispersion were more robust and indicated greater ecological heterogeneity within restored reaches, particularly when considering functional trait compositions. Organic biotopes (macrophyte stands and macroalgae) occurred widely across all study sites and supported a high alpha (within-habitat) taxonomic diversity compared to mineralogical biotopes (sand and gravel patches), which were characteristic of restored reaches. However, mineralogical biotopes possessed a higher beta (between-habitat) functional diversity, although this was less pronounced for taxonomic compositions. This study demonstrates that examining the functional and structural properties of taxa across distinct biotopes can provide a greater understanding of biotic responses to river restoration works. Such information could be used to better understand the ecological implications of rehabilitation practices and guide more effective management strategies.",
keywords = "Habitat enhancement, Invertebrates, Lotic ecosystems, River rehabilitation, Traits",
author = "James White and Matthew Hill and Melanie Bickerton and Paul Wood",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-017-0889-1",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "513--525",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Macroinvertebrate taxonomic and functional trait compositions within lotic habitats affected by river restoration practices. / White, James; Hill, Matthew; Bickerton, Melanie; Wood, Paul.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 60, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 513-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macroinvertebrate taxonomic and functional trait compositions within lotic habitats affected by river restoration practices

AU - White, James

AU - Hill, Matthew

AU - Bickerton, Melanie

AU - Wood, Paul

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - The widespread degradation of lotic ecosystems has prompted extensive river restoration efforts globally, but many studies have reported modest ecological responses to rehabilitation practices. The functional properties of biotic communities are rarely examined within post-project appraisals, which would provide more ecological information underpinning ecosystem responses to restoration practices and potentially pinpoint project limitations. This study examines macroinvertebrate community responses to three projects which aimed to physically restore channel morphologies. Taxonomic and functional trait compositions supported by widely occurring lotic habitats (biotopes) were examined across paired restored and non-restored (control) reaches. The multivariate location (average community composition) of taxonomic and functional trait compositions differed marginally between control and restored reaches. However, changes in the amount of multivariate dispersion were more robust and indicated greater ecological heterogeneity within restored reaches, particularly when considering functional trait compositions. Organic biotopes (macrophyte stands and macroalgae) occurred widely across all study sites and supported a high alpha (within-habitat) taxonomic diversity compared to mineralogical biotopes (sand and gravel patches), which were characteristic of restored reaches. However, mineralogical biotopes possessed a higher beta (between-habitat) functional diversity, although this was less pronounced for taxonomic compositions. This study demonstrates that examining the functional and structural properties of taxa across distinct biotopes can provide a greater understanding of biotic responses to river restoration works. Such information could be used to better understand the ecological implications of rehabilitation practices and guide more effective management strategies.

AB - The widespread degradation of lotic ecosystems has prompted extensive river restoration efforts globally, but many studies have reported modest ecological responses to rehabilitation practices. The functional properties of biotic communities are rarely examined within post-project appraisals, which would provide more ecological information underpinning ecosystem responses to restoration practices and potentially pinpoint project limitations. This study examines macroinvertebrate community responses to three projects which aimed to physically restore channel morphologies. Taxonomic and functional trait compositions supported by widely occurring lotic habitats (biotopes) were examined across paired restored and non-restored (control) reaches. The multivariate location (average community composition) of taxonomic and functional trait compositions differed marginally between control and restored reaches. However, changes in the amount of multivariate dispersion were more robust and indicated greater ecological heterogeneity within restored reaches, particularly when considering functional trait compositions. Organic biotopes (macrophyte stands and macroalgae) occurred widely across all study sites and supported a high alpha (within-habitat) taxonomic diversity compared to mineralogical biotopes (sand and gravel patches), which were characteristic of restored reaches. However, mineralogical biotopes possessed a higher beta (between-habitat) functional diversity, although this was less pronounced for taxonomic compositions. This study demonstrates that examining the functional and structural properties of taxa across distinct biotopes can provide a greater understanding of biotic responses to river restoration works. Such information could be used to better understand the ecological implications of rehabilitation practices and guide more effective management strategies.

KW - Habitat enhancement

KW - Invertebrates

KW - Lotic ecosystems

KW - River rehabilitation

KW - Traits

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-017-0889-1

DO - 10.1007/s00267-017-0889-1

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 513

EP - 525

JO - Environmental Management

T2 - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 3

ER -