Making globalization work for the poor: The 2000 White Paper reconsidered

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most aspects of the argument of the UK government's 2000 White Paper on globalization and development stand up reasonably well to the findings of subsequent research. But there is significant new evidence in two areas: the size of the contribution of institutions to growth; and the complexity of the effects of increased openness on poor people.

LanguageEnglish
Pages933-937
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of International Development
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

globalization
evidence
effect

Cite this

@article{4a99eb22210746f19965bc75905f90fc,
title = "Making globalization work for the poor: The 2000 White Paper reconsidered",
abstract = "Most aspects of the argument of the UK government's 2000 White Paper on globalization and development stand up reasonably well to the findings of subsequent research. But there is significant new evidence in two areas: the size of the contribution of institutions to growth; and the complexity of the effects of increased openness on poor people.",
author = "Adrian Wood",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/jid.1154",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "933--937",
journal = "Journal of International Development",
issn = "0954-1748",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

Making globalization work for the poor : The 2000 White Paper reconsidered. / Wood, Adrian.

In: Journal of International Development, Vol. 16, No. 7, 10.2004, p. 933-937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making globalization work for the poor

T2 - Journal of International Development

AU - Wood, Adrian

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - Most aspects of the argument of the UK government's 2000 White Paper on globalization and development stand up reasonably well to the findings of subsequent research. But there is significant new evidence in two areas: the size of the contribution of institutions to growth; and the complexity of the effects of increased openness on poor people.

AB - Most aspects of the argument of the UK government's 2000 White Paper on globalization and development stand up reasonably well to the findings of subsequent research. But there is significant new evidence in two areas: the size of the contribution of institutions to growth; and the complexity of the effects of increased openness on poor people.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6944250186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jid.1154

DO - 10.1002/jid.1154

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 933

EP - 937

JO - Journal of International Development

JF - Journal of International Development

SN - 0954-1748

IS - 7

ER -