Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders: a review

Anthony Burton, Nicholas A. S. Kendall, Brian Pearce, Lisa Birrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Upper limb disorders (ULDs) are clinically challenging and responsible for considerable work loss. There is a need to determine effective approaches for their management.

Aim To determine evidence-based management strategies for work-relevant ULDs and explore whether a biopsychosocial approach is appropriate.

Methods Literature review using a best evidence synthesis. Data from articles identified through systematic searching of electronic databases and citation tracking were extracted into evidence tables. The information was synthesized into high-level evidence statements, which were ordered into themes covering classification/diagnosis, epidemiology, associations/risks and management/treatment, focusing on return to work or work retention and taking account of distinctions between non-specific complaints and specific diagnoses.

Results Neither biomedical treatment nor ergonomic workplace interventions alone offer an optimal solution; rather, multimodal interventions show considerable promise, particularly for occupational outcomes. Early return to work, or work retention, is an important goal for most cases and may be facilitated, where necessary, by transitional work arrangements. The emergent evidence indicates that successful management strategies require all the players to be onside and acting in a coordinated fashion; this requires engaging employers and workers to participate.

Conclusions The biopsychosocial model applies: biological considerations should not be ignored, but psychosocial factors are more influential for occupational outcomes. Implementation of interventions that address the full range of psychosocial issues will require a cultural shift in the way the relationship between upper limb complaints and work is conceived and handled. Dissemination of evidence-based messages can contribute to the needed cultural shift.
LanguageEnglish
Pages44-52
Number of pages9
JournalOccupational Medicine
Volume59
Issue number1
Early online date10 Dec 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Return to Work
Biological Models
Human Engineering
Risk Management
Workplace
Epidemiology
Databases
Psychology

Cite this

Burton, Anthony ; Kendall, Nicholas A. S. ; Pearce, Brian ; Birrell, Lisa. / Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders : a review. In: Occupational Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 59, No. 1. pp. 44-52.
@article{130aacc326ba4f0bbef5ccf2ce846eb3,
title = "Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders: a review",
abstract = "Background Upper limb disorders (ULDs) are clinically challenging and responsible for considerable work loss. There is a need to determine effective approaches for their management.Aim To determine evidence-based management strategies for work-relevant ULDs and explore whether a biopsychosocial approach is appropriate.Methods Literature review using a best evidence synthesis. Data from articles identified through systematic searching of electronic databases and citation tracking were extracted into evidence tables. The information was synthesized into high-level evidence statements, which were ordered into themes covering classification/diagnosis, epidemiology, associations/risks and management/treatment, focusing on return to work or work retention and taking account of distinctions between non-specific complaints and specific diagnoses.Results Neither biomedical treatment nor ergonomic workplace interventions alone offer an optimal solution; rather, multimodal interventions show considerable promise, particularly for occupational outcomes. Early return to work, or work retention, is an important goal for most cases and may be facilitated, where necessary, by transitional work arrangements. The emergent evidence indicates that successful management strategies require all the players to be onside and acting in a coordinated fashion; this requires engaging employers and workers to participate.Conclusions The biopsychosocial model applies: biological considerations should not be ignored, but psychosocial factors are more influential for occupational outcomes. Implementation of interventions that address the full range of psychosocial issues will require a cultural shift in the way the relationship between upper limb complaints and work is conceived and handled. Dissemination of evidence-based messages can contribute to the needed cultural shift.",
keywords = "biopsychosocial, interventions, return to work, Upper limb disorder, work relevant",
author = "Anthony Burton and Kendall, {Nicholas A. S.} and Brian Pearce and Lisa Birrell",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/occmed/kqn151",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "44--52",
journal = "Occupational Medicine",
issn = "0962-7480",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders : a review. / Burton, Anthony; Kendall, Nicholas A. S.; Pearce, Brian; Birrell, Lisa.

In: Occupational Medicine, Vol. 59, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 44-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders

T2 - Occupational Medicine

AU - Burton, Anthony

AU - Kendall, Nicholas A. S.

AU - Pearce, Brian

AU - Birrell, Lisa

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Background Upper limb disorders (ULDs) are clinically challenging and responsible for considerable work loss. There is a need to determine effective approaches for their management.Aim To determine evidence-based management strategies for work-relevant ULDs and explore whether a biopsychosocial approach is appropriate.Methods Literature review using a best evidence synthesis. Data from articles identified through systematic searching of electronic databases and citation tracking were extracted into evidence tables. The information was synthesized into high-level evidence statements, which were ordered into themes covering classification/diagnosis, epidemiology, associations/risks and management/treatment, focusing on return to work or work retention and taking account of distinctions between non-specific complaints and specific diagnoses.Results Neither biomedical treatment nor ergonomic workplace interventions alone offer an optimal solution; rather, multimodal interventions show considerable promise, particularly for occupational outcomes. Early return to work, or work retention, is an important goal for most cases and may be facilitated, where necessary, by transitional work arrangements. The emergent evidence indicates that successful management strategies require all the players to be onside and acting in a coordinated fashion; this requires engaging employers and workers to participate.Conclusions The biopsychosocial model applies: biological considerations should not be ignored, but psychosocial factors are more influential for occupational outcomes. Implementation of interventions that address the full range of psychosocial issues will require a cultural shift in the way the relationship between upper limb complaints and work is conceived and handled. Dissemination of evidence-based messages can contribute to the needed cultural shift.

AB - Background Upper limb disorders (ULDs) are clinically challenging and responsible for considerable work loss. There is a need to determine effective approaches for their management.Aim To determine evidence-based management strategies for work-relevant ULDs and explore whether a biopsychosocial approach is appropriate.Methods Literature review using a best evidence synthesis. Data from articles identified through systematic searching of electronic databases and citation tracking were extracted into evidence tables. The information was synthesized into high-level evidence statements, which were ordered into themes covering classification/diagnosis, epidemiology, associations/risks and management/treatment, focusing on return to work or work retention and taking account of distinctions between non-specific complaints and specific diagnoses.Results Neither biomedical treatment nor ergonomic workplace interventions alone offer an optimal solution; rather, multimodal interventions show considerable promise, particularly for occupational outcomes. Early return to work, or work retention, is an important goal for most cases and may be facilitated, where necessary, by transitional work arrangements. The emergent evidence indicates that successful management strategies require all the players to be onside and acting in a coordinated fashion; this requires engaging employers and workers to participate.Conclusions The biopsychosocial model applies: biological considerations should not be ignored, but psychosocial factors are more influential for occupational outcomes. Implementation of interventions that address the full range of psychosocial issues will require a cultural shift in the way the relationship between upper limb complaints and work is conceived and handled. Dissemination of evidence-based messages can contribute to the needed cultural shift.

KW - biopsychosocial

KW - interventions

KW - return to work

KW - Upper limb disorder

KW - work relevant

U2 - 10.1093/occmed/kqn151

DO - 10.1093/occmed/kqn151

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 44

EP - 52

JO - Occupational Medicine

JF - Occupational Medicine

SN - 0962-7480

IS - 1

ER -