Abstract
Addressing calls to explore how subsidiaries of MNCs operating in different institutional contexts resolve institutional duality, this paper brings together dual theoretical explanations from legitimacy and neo-institutional theory, to examine how decision-making for corporate community responsibility (CCR) occurs across ten subsidiaries operating in Sri Lanka. Using qualitative data, it shows that while subsidiaries’ implementation of local CCR conform to that of their parents at an aggregate level, those subsidiaries encountering higher levels of institutional conflict in the host-country, are sanctioned by their parent companies to de-couple their local CCR projects. These findings raise interesting questions about the dynamism in subsidiary responses to resolving institutional duality relevant for future scholarly research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101911 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Long Range Planning |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 29 Aug 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Managing corporate community responsibility in multinational corporations: Resolving institutional duality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver