Masculinity, Injury, and Death: Implications for Anti-Knife-Carrying Messages

Marek Palasinski, William Brown, Neil Shortland, Damien W. Riggs, Minsi Chen, Lorraine Bowman-grieve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although knives are the most common homicide instrument in Britain, factors that influence knife-carrying tolerance (i.e., the extent to which it is seen as acceptable and justified) and perceptions of anti-knife messages (i.e., slogans and posters aimed at reducing knife crime) have not been examined, which the current article will cover by featuring progressively related studies. In Study 1, 227 men took part in a study on factors associated with knife-carrying. In Study 2, 200 participants took part in an experimental study on anti-knife slogans. In Study 3, 169 men took part in a study on existing anti-knife injury posters. In Study 4, 151 men took part in a study on anti-knife CGI posters featuring an avatar with different types of knife injury. Study 1 proposes a structural equation model that shows the intercorrelations between physical defense ability, limited trust in authority, limited control over one’s status and the need for respect, and how they predict aggressive masculinity (i.e., macho culture), which, in turn, predicts knife-carrying tolerance. The model also reveals two significant latent factors: saving face inter-male competition (i.e., honor) and perceived social ecological constraints (i.e., socioeconomic limitations). Study 2 shows that the injury slogan was rated as most persuasive. Study 3 shows that the fresh injury poster was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. Study 4 shows that it was the eye injury that was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. The article supports protection motivation theory and offers practical insights into tackling knife crime.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Early online date18 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Masculinity
Posters
Wounds and Injuries
Crime
Eye Injuries
Aptitude
Homicide
Structural Models
Motivation

Cite this

Palasinski, Marek ; Brown, William ; Shortland, Neil ; Riggs, Damien W. ; Chen, Minsi ; Bowman-grieve, Lorraine. / Masculinity, Injury, and Death : Implications for Anti-Knife-Carrying Messages. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2019.
@article{ce71a4b9dd084ceaaea20fa5a257c5e3,
title = "Masculinity, Injury, and Death: Implications for Anti-Knife-Carrying Messages",
abstract = "Although knives are the most common homicide instrument in Britain, factors that influence knife-carrying tolerance (i.e., the extent to which it is seen as acceptable and justified) and perceptions of anti-knife messages (i.e., slogans and posters aimed at reducing knife crime) have not been examined, which the current article will cover by featuring progressively related studies. In Study 1, 227 men took part in a study on factors associated with knife-carrying. In Study 2, 200 participants took part in an experimental study on anti-knife slogans. In Study 3, 169 men took part in a study on existing anti-knife injury posters. In Study 4, 151 men took part in a study on anti-knife CGI posters featuring an avatar with different types of knife injury. Study 1 proposes a structural equation model that shows the intercorrelations between physical defense ability, limited trust in authority, limited control over one’s status and the need for respect, and how they predict aggressive masculinity (i.e., macho culture), which, in turn, predicts knife-carrying tolerance. The model also reveals two significant latent factors: saving face inter-male competition (i.e., honor) and perceived social ecological constraints (i.e., socioeconomic limitations). Study 2 shows that the injury slogan was rated as most persuasive. Study 3 shows that the fresh injury poster was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. Study 4 shows that it was the eye injury that was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. The article supports protection motivation theory and offers practical insights into tackling knife crime.",
keywords = "Community safety, Knife-carrying, Masculinity, Messages, Violence prevention, violence prevention, messages, knife-carrying, masculinity, community safety",
author = "Marek Palasinski and William Brown and Neil Shortland and Riggs, {Damien W.} and Minsi Chen and Lorraine Bowman-grieve",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1177/0886260518822341",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

Masculinity, Injury, and Death : Implications for Anti-Knife-Carrying Messages. / Palasinski, Marek; Brown, William; Shortland, Neil; Riggs, Damien W.; Chen, Minsi; Bowman-grieve, Lorraine.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Masculinity, Injury, and Death

T2 - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

AU - Palasinski, Marek

AU - Brown, William

AU - Shortland, Neil

AU - Riggs, Damien W.

AU - Chen, Minsi

AU - Bowman-grieve, Lorraine

PY - 2019/1/18

Y1 - 2019/1/18

N2 - Although knives are the most common homicide instrument in Britain, factors that influence knife-carrying tolerance (i.e., the extent to which it is seen as acceptable and justified) and perceptions of anti-knife messages (i.e., slogans and posters aimed at reducing knife crime) have not been examined, which the current article will cover by featuring progressively related studies. In Study 1, 227 men took part in a study on factors associated with knife-carrying. In Study 2, 200 participants took part in an experimental study on anti-knife slogans. In Study 3, 169 men took part in a study on existing anti-knife injury posters. In Study 4, 151 men took part in a study on anti-knife CGI posters featuring an avatar with different types of knife injury. Study 1 proposes a structural equation model that shows the intercorrelations between physical defense ability, limited trust in authority, limited control over one’s status and the need for respect, and how they predict aggressive masculinity (i.e., macho culture), which, in turn, predicts knife-carrying tolerance. The model also reveals two significant latent factors: saving face inter-male competition (i.e., honor) and perceived social ecological constraints (i.e., socioeconomic limitations). Study 2 shows that the injury slogan was rated as most persuasive. Study 3 shows that the fresh injury poster was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. Study 4 shows that it was the eye injury that was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. The article supports protection motivation theory and offers practical insights into tackling knife crime.

AB - Although knives are the most common homicide instrument in Britain, factors that influence knife-carrying tolerance (i.e., the extent to which it is seen as acceptable and justified) and perceptions of anti-knife messages (i.e., slogans and posters aimed at reducing knife crime) have not been examined, which the current article will cover by featuring progressively related studies. In Study 1, 227 men took part in a study on factors associated with knife-carrying. In Study 2, 200 participants took part in an experimental study on anti-knife slogans. In Study 3, 169 men took part in a study on existing anti-knife injury posters. In Study 4, 151 men took part in a study on anti-knife CGI posters featuring an avatar with different types of knife injury. Study 1 proposes a structural equation model that shows the intercorrelations between physical defense ability, limited trust in authority, limited control over one’s status and the need for respect, and how they predict aggressive masculinity (i.e., macho culture), which, in turn, predicts knife-carrying tolerance. The model also reveals two significant latent factors: saving face inter-male competition (i.e., honor) and perceived social ecological constraints (i.e., socioeconomic limitations). Study 2 shows that the injury slogan was rated as most persuasive. Study 3 shows that the fresh injury poster was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. Study 4 shows that it was the eye injury that was rated as most persuasive, emotional, and believable. The article supports protection motivation theory and offers practical insights into tackling knife crime.

KW - Community safety

KW - Knife-carrying

KW - Masculinity

KW - Messages

KW - Violence prevention

KW - violence prevention

KW - messages

KW - knife-carrying

KW - masculinity

KW - community safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060575255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260518822341

DO - 10.1177/0886260518822341

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

ER -