May the Subaltern Speak?

Researching the Invisible "Other" in Higher Education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social challenges...
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-54
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Higher Education
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

education
dialectics
worker
responsibility

Cite this

@article{0140c75a3ecb4f40895c9b87e667c226,
title = "May the Subaltern Speak?: Researching the Invisible {"}Other{"} in Higher Education",
abstract = "This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social challenges...",
keywords = "non-academic staff, knowledge workers, ethnography, higher education, South Africa",
author = "Vicki Trowler",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/21568235.2013.851614",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "42--54",
journal = "European Journal of Higher Education",
issn = "2156-8235",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

May the Subaltern Speak? Researching the Invisible "Other" in Higher Education. / Trowler, Vicki.

In: European Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014, p. 42-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - May the Subaltern Speak?

T2 - Researching the Invisible "Other" in Higher Education

AU - Trowler, Vicki

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social challenges...

AB - This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social This paper, written as a confessional tale, explores the dialectic between the perception of the researcher (‘how the multiple positions HE researchers simultaneously occupy in the field influence the framing of the research’) and the reception of the researcher (‘how the playing out of the researcher's role within the specific context – as an ‘insider’ amongst the ‘invisible other’ in a HE institution – was facilitated and constrained by the multiplicity of positions') and how this bequeathed both a multiplicity of levels of access and a complex burden of responsibility towards the data and its subsequent ab/uses. The paper reflects on a study of the changing class locations of ‘non-academic’ ‘knowledge workers’. Studying ‘the other’ requires access to what Scott describes as ‘hidden transcripts’, which take place within subaltern space. Endogenous research allows access but brings ethical, political and social challenges...

KW - non-academic staff

KW - knowledge workers

KW - ethnography

KW - higher education

KW - South Africa

U2 - 10.1080/21568235.2013.851614

DO - 10.1080/21568235.2013.851614

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 42

EP - 54

JO - European Journal of Higher Education

JF - European Journal of Higher Education

SN - 2156-8235

IS - 1

ER -