Measuring flexibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intuitively one would think that good flexibility (both extent and dynamic) would reduce the risk of injury as well as enhance performance, and the limited evidence available would tend to support this view. However, much of this evidence is based on studies of young fit sportspersons; we cannot conclude that the same principles apply to the general population until well-designed studies, using suitable instruments, have been performed. Reliable tools for measurement of flexibility are described, together with statistical methods considered appropriate for quantifying reliability. Recently described methods present the opportunity to investigate further, and it seems likely that dynamic flexibility will be a useful parameter to study. In all probability, prediction of fitness-for-task should be based not just on flexibility measures but on multivariable models; flexibility measurement is but one of a number of parameters to be viewed interactively in relation to the specific task or sport under consideration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-307
Number of pages5
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 1991

Fingerprint

flexibility
Sports
Statistical methods
Wounds and Injuries
Population
statistical method
fitness
evidence
performance

Cite this

Burton, K. / Measuring flexibility. In: Applied Ergonomics. 1991 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 303-307.
@article{77bff869d96741e59f0a951c3ac74410,
title = "Measuring flexibility",
abstract = "Intuitively one would think that good flexibility (both extent and dynamic) would reduce the risk of injury as well as enhance performance, and the limited evidence available would tend to support this view. However, much of this evidence is based on studies of young fit sportspersons; we cannot conclude that the same principles apply to the general population until well-designed studies, using suitable instruments, have been performed. Reliable tools for measurement of flexibility are described, together with statistical methods considered appropriate for quantifying reliability. Recently described methods present the opportunity to investigate further, and it seems likely that dynamic flexibility will be a useful parameter to study. In all probability, prediction of fitness-for-task should be based not just on flexibility measures but on multivariable models; flexibility measurement is but one of a number of parameters to be viewed interactively in relation to the specific task or sport under consideration.",
keywords = "Flexibility, goniometry, measurement, reliability, statistics, stretching",
author = "K. Burton",
year = "1991",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0003-6870(91)90385-U",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "303--307",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

Measuring flexibility. / Burton, K.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.10.1991, p. 303-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring flexibility

AU - Burton, K.

PY - 1991/10/1

Y1 - 1991/10/1

N2 - Intuitively one would think that good flexibility (both extent and dynamic) would reduce the risk of injury as well as enhance performance, and the limited evidence available would tend to support this view. However, much of this evidence is based on studies of young fit sportspersons; we cannot conclude that the same principles apply to the general population until well-designed studies, using suitable instruments, have been performed. Reliable tools for measurement of flexibility are described, together with statistical methods considered appropriate for quantifying reliability. Recently described methods present the opportunity to investigate further, and it seems likely that dynamic flexibility will be a useful parameter to study. In all probability, prediction of fitness-for-task should be based not just on flexibility measures but on multivariable models; flexibility measurement is but one of a number of parameters to be viewed interactively in relation to the specific task or sport under consideration.

AB - Intuitively one would think that good flexibility (both extent and dynamic) would reduce the risk of injury as well as enhance performance, and the limited evidence available would tend to support this view. However, much of this evidence is based on studies of young fit sportspersons; we cannot conclude that the same principles apply to the general population until well-designed studies, using suitable instruments, have been performed. Reliable tools for measurement of flexibility are described, together with statistical methods considered appropriate for quantifying reliability. Recently described methods present the opportunity to investigate further, and it seems likely that dynamic flexibility will be a useful parameter to study. In all probability, prediction of fitness-for-task should be based not just on flexibility measures but on multivariable models; flexibility measurement is but one of a number of parameters to be viewed interactively in relation to the specific task or sport under consideration.

KW - Flexibility

KW - goniometry

KW - measurement

KW - reliability

KW - statistics

KW - stretching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026094547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90385-U

DO - 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90385-U

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026094547

VL - 22

SP - 303

EP - 307

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 5

ER -