Media Academics as Media Audiences: Aesthetic Judgments in Media and Cultural Studies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this chapter I want to argue that the dismissal of aesthetic considerations from much work in media/cultural studies--a foundational gesture aimed at distinguishing academics from both "naive" consumers and "imposed" ideologies--does not, in fact, work to install critical rationality or desired neutrality (Barthes 2005). I will suggest that via its anti-aesthetics (see also Sandvoss, this volume) much cultural studies work has constructed cultural distinction for itself bu implying that its scholars are exempt from the domains of fan culture and/or popular culture (Hills 2002, 2005b). However, such a fantasized exemption has not all produced an escape from "popular aesthetics" (Bird 2003) but has instead recoded aesthetic judgments within the supposedly pristine spaces of academia.  
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFandom
Subtitle of host publicationIdentities and Communities in a Mediated World
EditorsJonathan Gray, C. Lee Harrington, Cornel Sandvoss
PublisherNYU Press
Chapter2
Pages33-47
Number of pages15
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9780814732380, 0814732380
ISBN (Print)0814731813, 9780814731819, 9780814731826, 0814731821
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Media Academics as Media Audiences: Aesthetic Judgments in Media and Cultural Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hills, M. (2007). Media Academics as Media Audiences: Aesthetic Judgments in Media and Cultural Studies. In J. Gray, C. L. Harrington, & C. Sandvoss (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World (1st ed., pp. 33-47). NYU Press.