Abstract
In this chapter I want to argue that the dismissal of aesthetic considerations from much work in media/cultural studies--a foundational gesture aimed at distinguishing academics from both "naive" consumers and "imposed" ideologies--does not, in fact, work to install critical rationality or desired neutrality (Barthes 2005). I will suggest that via its anti-aesthetics (see also Sandvoss, this volume) much cultural studies work has constructed cultural distinction for itself bu implying that its scholars are exempt from the domains of fan culture and/or popular culture (Hills 2002, 2005b). However, such a fantasized exemption has not all produced an escape from "popular aesthetics" (Bird 2003) but has instead recoded aesthetic judgments within the supposedly pristine spaces of academia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Fandom |
| Subtitle of host publication | Identities and Communities in a Mediated World |
| Editors | Jonathan Gray, C. Lee Harrington, Cornel Sandvoss |
| Publisher | NYU Press |
| Chapter | 2 |
| Pages | 33-47 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780814732380, 0814732380 |
| ISBN (Print) | 0814731813, 9780814731819, 9780814731826, 0814731821 |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Media Academics as Media Audiences: Aesthetic Judgments in Media and Cultural Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver