Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Meta-research on crisis communication: 24 years of research in Public Relations Review (2000–2023)

Álvaro Elgueta-Ruiz, Gabriel Sadi, Gisela Gonçalves, Javier Martínez-Ortiz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

During the last two decades, crisis communication research has increased significantly, becoming one of the main research topics, with scholars mainly examining how crises can affect the results of an organization and its stakeholders. However, despite the growing literature, knowledge, and theories, a systematic approach to crisis communication research is still limited. Faced with this reality, this study explores the state of crisis communication research through a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of all articles published on this topic in Public Relations Review, the leading journal in the field, between 2000 and 2023 (n = 391 of a total of 1906 articles published in that period). This paper identifies the main authors, the universities to which they belong, the work networks they constitute, their objectives, questions, hypotheses, methodologies, type of research, as well as the theories, results and conclusions that are produced, among other important issues. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of crisis communication research in the field of public relations and related areas are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102685
Number of pages17
JournalPublic Relations Review
Volume52
Issue number2
Early online date4 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Apr 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-research on crisis communication: 24 years of research in Public Relations Review (2000–2023)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this