TY - JOUR
T1 - Millimeter Wave Receiver Efficiency
T2 - A Comprehensive Comparison of Beamforming Schemes With Low Resolution ADCs
AU - Abbas, Waqas Bin
AU - Gomez-Cuba, Felipe
AU - Zorzi, Michele
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received February 18, 2017; revised August 8, 2017 and August 30, 2017; accepted September 14, 2017. Date of publication October 3, 2017; date of current version December 8, 2017. The work of F. Gomez-Cuba was supported by FPU12/01319 and by EC H2020-MSCA-IF-2015 704837. The work of M. Zorzi was supported by NYU Wireless. This paper was presented at the European Wireless 2016 and 2017 Conferences, Oulu, Finland and Dresden, Germany, respectively, [1], [2]. The associate editor coordinating the review of this paper and approving it for publication was A. Zajic. (Corresponding author: Waqas Bin Abbas.) W. B. Abbas is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan (e-mail: [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - In this paper, we study the achievable rate and the energy efficiency of analog, hybrid, and digital combining (AC, HC, and DC) for millimeter wave (mmW) receivers. We take into account the power consumption of all receiver components, not just analog-To-digital converters (ADCs), determine some practical limitations of beamforming in each architecture, and develop performance analysis charts that enable comparison of different receivers simultaneously in terms of two metrics, namely, spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE). We present a multi-objective utility optimization interpretation to find the best SE-EE weighted tradeoff among AC, DC, and HC schemes. We consider an additive quantization noise model to evaluate the achievable rates with low resolution ADCs. Our analysis shows that AC is only advantageous if the channel rank is strictly one, the link has very low SNR, or there is a very stringent low power constraint at the receiver. Otherwise, we show that the usual claim that DC requires the highest power is not universally valid. Rather, either DC or HC alternatively results in the better SE versus EE tradeoff depending strongly on the considered power consumption characteristic values for each component of the mmW receiver.
AB - In this paper, we study the achievable rate and the energy efficiency of analog, hybrid, and digital combining (AC, HC, and DC) for millimeter wave (mmW) receivers. We take into account the power consumption of all receiver components, not just analog-To-digital converters (ADCs), determine some practical limitations of beamforming in each architecture, and develop performance analysis charts that enable comparison of different receivers simultaneously in terms of two metrics, namely, spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE). We present a multi-objective utility optimization interpretation to find the best SE-EE weighted tradeoff among AC, DC, and HC schemes. We consider an additive quantization noise model to evaluate the achievable rates with low resolution ADCs. Our analysis shows that AC is only advantageous if the channel rank is strictly one, the link has very low SNR, or there is a very stringent low power constraint at the receiver. Otherwise, we show that the usual claim that DC requires the highest power is not universally valid. Rather, either DC or HC alternatively results in the better SE versus EE tradeoff depending strongly on the considered power consumption characteristic values for each component of the mmW receiver.
KW - Analog beamforming
KW - Digital beamforming
KW - Energy efficiency
KW - Hybrid beamforming
KW - Low resolution ADCs.
KW - Millimeter wave
KW - Spectral efficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030773386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TWC.2017.2757919
DO - 10.1109/TWC.2017.2757919
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030773386
VL - 16
SP - 8131
EP - 8146
JO - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
JF - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
SN - 1536-1276
IS - 12
M1 - 8057288
ER -