Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual: Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Despite their many political and philosophical allegiances, Deleuze and Derrida might - in accordance with Deleuze and Parnet’s dictum – be best described as the opposite of a couple. Whilst their mutual hostility towards conceptual stasis, overly linear approaches to temporality and excessively centred notions of subjectivity targeted a number of common philosophical opponents, this apparent unity of purpose arose out of some seemingly incommensurable tensions: Deleuze’s mode of ontological enquiry squared poorly with Derrida’s rejection of metaphysics; Deleuze’s positive engagement with the sciences, and his prioritisation of material-sensation sat awkwardly with Derrida’s more pervasively textual and somewhat idealist orientation; and Deleuze’s development of an impersonal concept of Husserlian expression served to check Derrida’s rather more stringent and single minded rejection of phenomenological presentism.It is important to remember, however, that like Derrida, Deleuze was predominately a writer – albeit a writer with an at once affective, performative and corporeal agenda. Indeed, when taken at face value, it would seem to have been Derrida who more directly explored the graphic potentialities of experimental writing. Deleuze’s emphasis upon performativity, emergence, and onto-genetic construction nevertheless serves to extend and supplement the Derridean account of textuality by exposing its neglect of the process of writing. In so doing it foregrounds the potential for Deleuzo-Derridean philosophy to instantiate a genuinely aesthetico-conceptual image of thought.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2
PublisherLeuven University Press
Chapter18
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 10 May 2019
Event2nd International Conference on Deleuze and Artistic Research: Aberrant Nuptials - Orpheus Institute, Ghent, Belgium
Duration: 20 Nov 201722 Nov 2017
Conference number: 2
https://www.fabula.org/actualites/dare-2017-aberrant-nuptials2nd-international-conference-on-deleuze-and-artistic-research_76948.php (Link to Conference Details)

Conference

Conference2nd International Conference on Deleuze and Artistic Research
Abbreviated titleDARE 2018
CountryBelgium
CityGhent
Period20/11/1722/11/17
OtherThe philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and its resonating discourses have become increasingly relevant to the field of Artistic Research, and Deleuze is now a key reference for many artist-researchers engaging with knowledge across artistic, academic and non-academic fields of practice. DARE 2015: The Dark Precursor was the first conference attempting to trace the encounter between artistic research and Deleuze’s world. The Second International Conference on Deleuze and Artistic Research, DARE 2017: Aberrant Nuptials, continues that mapping, readdressing the question ‘How can communication occur between heterogeneous systems?’ through the associated concepts of ‘aberrant nuptials’ and ‘zone of indeterminacy’.
Internet address

Fingerprint

Jacques Derrida
Gilles Deleuze
Writer
Rejection
Neglect
Metaphysics
Stasis
Textuality
Dictum
Potentiality
Presentism
Agenda
Performativity
Allegiance
Opponents
Ontological
Impersonals
Temporality
Unity
Affective

Cite this

Roberts, S. (Accepted/In press). Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual: Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research. In Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2 Leuven University Press.
Roberts, Spencer. / Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual : Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research. Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2. Leuven University Press, 2019.
@inbook{1df223ec0a8242ffb8c967fc288ce928,
title = "Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual: Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research",
abstract = "Despite their many political and philosophical allegiances, Deleuze and Derrida might - in accordance with Deleuze and Parnet’s dictum – be best described as the opposite of a couple. Whilst their mutual hostility towards conceptual stasis, overly linear approaches to temporality and excessively centred notions of subjectivity targeted a number of common philosophical opponents, this apparent unity of purpose arose out of some seemingly incommensurable tensions: Deleuze’s mode of ontological enquiry squared poorly with Derrida’s rejection of metaphysics; Deleuze’s positive engagement with the sciences, and his prioritisation of material-sensation sat awkwardly with Derrida’s more pervasively textual and somewhat idealist orientation; and Deleuze’s development of an impersonal concept of Husserlian expression served to check Derrida’s rather more stringent and single minded rejection of phenomenological presentism.It is important to remember, however, that like Derrida, Deleuze was predominately a writer – albeit a writer with an at once affective, performative and corporeal agenda. Indeed, when taken at face value, it would seem to have been Derrida who more directly explored the graphic potentialities of experimental writing. Deleuze’s emphasis upon performativity, emergence, and onto-genetic construction nevertheless serves to extend and supplement the Derridean account of textuality by exposing its neglect of the process of writing. In so doing it foregrounds the potential for Deleuzo-Derridean philosophy to instantiate a genuinely aesthetico-conceptual image of thought.",
author = "Spencer Roberts",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "10",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2",
publisher = "Leuven University Press",
address = "Belgium",

}

Roberts, S 2019, Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual: Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research. in Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2. Leuven University Press, 2nd International Conference on Deleuze and Artistic Research, Ghent, Belgium, 20/11/17.

Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual : Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research. / Roberts, Spencer.

Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2. Leuven University Press, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual

T2 - Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research

AU - Roberts, Spencer

PY - 2019/5/10

Y1 - 2019/5/10

N2 - Despite their many political and philosophical allegiances, Deleuze and Derrida might - in accordance with Deleuze and Parnet’s dictum – be best described as the opposite of a couple. Whilst their mutual hostility towards conceptual stasis, overly linear approaches to temporality and excessively centred notions of subjectivity targeted a number of common philosophical opponents, this apparent unity of purpose arose out of some seemingly incommensurable tensions: Deleuze’s mode of ontological enquiry squared poorly with Derrida’s rejection of metaphysics; Deleuze’s positive engagement with the sciences, and his prioritisation of material-sensation sat awkwardly with Derrida’s more pervasively textual and somewhat idealist orientation; and Deleuze’s development of an impersonal concept of Husserlian expression served to check Derrida’s rather more stringent and single minded rejection of phenomenological presentism.It is important to remember, however, that like Derrida, Deleuze was predominately a writer – albeit a writer with an at once affective, performative and corporeal agenda. Indeed, when taken at face value, it would seem to have been Derrida who more directly explored the graphic potentialities of experimental writing. Deleuze’s emphasis upon performativity, emergence, and onto-genetic construction nevertheless serves to extend and supplement the Derridean account of textuality by exposing its neglect of the process of writing. In so doing it foregrounds the potential for Deleuzo-Derridean philosophy to instantiate a genuinely aesthetico-conceptual image of thought.

AB - Despite their many political and philosophical allegiances, Deleuze and Derrida might - in accordance with Deleuze and Parnet’s dictum – be best described as the opposite of a couple. Whilst their mutual hostility towards conceptual stasis, overly linear approaches to temporality and excessively centred notions of subjectivity targeted a number of common philosophical opponents, this apparent unity of purpose arose out of some seemingly incommensurable tensions: Deleuze’s mode of ontological enquiry squared poorly with Derrida’s rejection of metaphysics; Deleuze’s positive engagement with the sciences, and his prioritisation of material-sensation sat awkwardly with Derrida’s more pervasively textual and somewhat idealist orientation; and Deleuze’s development of an impersonal concept of Husserlian expression served to check Derrida’s rather more stringent and single minded rejection of phenomenological presentism.It is important to remember, however, that like Derrida, Deleuze was predominately a writer – albeit a writer with an at once affective, performative and corporeal agenda. Indeed, when taken at face value, it would seem to have been Derrida who more directly explored the graphic potentialities of experimental writing. Deleuze’s emphasis upon performativity, emergence, and onto-genetic construction nevertheless serves to extend and supplement the Derridean account of textuality by exposing its neglect of the process of writing. In so doing it foregrounds the potential for Deleuzo-Derridean philosophy to instantiate a genuinely aesthetico-conceptual image of thought.

M3 - Chapter

BT - Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2

PB - Leuven University Press

ER -

Roberts S. Mining the Aesthetico-Conceptual: Deleuze, Derrida and Artistic Research. In Aberrant Nuptials. Deleuze and Artistic Research 2. Leuven University Press. 2019