Missing Children Appeal Designs

Is Recall Accuracy Influenced by the Design of the Appeal?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When a child goes missing it is common practice to release an appeal of the child in the hope that a member of the public could help to identify and locate them. Despite being an everyday occurrence, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how effective these appeals are. The present study sought to explore the effectiveness of missing children appeals through the recall accuracy of the general public immediately after observing the appeals and again after a three-day delay. One hundred and eighty-two participants observed either a mock Child Rescue Alert or a mock Twitter appeal. The results found no significant difference in recall accuracy between the design of the appeals although there was a significant difference in recall error. Confidence in own recall accuracy and the length of time spent observing the appeals were also found to be significantly associated with recall accuracy. Initial recall accuracy scores were significantly higher than recall accuracy scores following a three-day break. This exploratory study demonstrates the requirement to improve missing children appeals and lays the foundation for future studies to build on these findings further.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Psychology
Early online date13 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Aug 2019

Cite this

@article{eb6fe94d34a746669c1eea0473aac2d6,
title = "Missing Children Appeal Designs: Is Recall Accuracy Influenced by the Design of the Appeal?",
abstract = "When a child goes missing it is common practice to release an appeal of the child in the hope that a member of the public could help to identify and locate them. Despite being an everyday occurrence, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how effective these appeals are. The present study sought to explore the effectiveness of missing children appeals through the recall accuracy of the general public immediately after observing the appeals and again after a three-day delay. One hundred and eighty-two participants observed either a mock Child Rescue Alert or a mock Twitter appeal. The results found no significant difference in recall accuracy between the design of the appeals although there was a significant difference in recall error. Confidence in own recall accuracy and the length of time spent observing the appeals were also found to be significantly associated with recall accuracy. Initial recall accuracy scores were significantly higher than recall accuracy scores following a three-day break. This exploratory study demonstrates the requirement to improve missing children appeals and lays the foundation for future studies to build on these findings further.",
keywords = "Missing Children, Missing Children Appeal, Missing persons, Missing Persons Appeal, Recall accuracy, Child rescue alerts, Twitter appeal, Child rescue alert, Missing children",
author = "Daniel Hunt and Maria Ioannou and John Synnott",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s12144-019-00403-w",
language = "English",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "1046-1310",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing Children Appeal Designs

T2 - Is Recall Accuracy Influenced by the Design of the Appeal?

AU - Hunt, Daniel

AU - Ioannou, Maria

AU - Synnott, John

PY - 2019/8/13

Y1 - 2019/8/13

N2 - When a child goes missing it is common practice to release an appeal of the child in the hope that a member of the public could help to identify and locate them. Despite being an everyday occurrence, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how effective these appeals are. The present study sought to explore the effectiveness of missing children appeals through the recall accuracy of the general public immediately after observing the appeals and again after a three-day delay. One hundred and eighty-two participants observed either a mock Child Rescue Alert or a mock Twitter appeal. The results found no significant difference in recall accuracy between the design of the appeals although there was a significant difference in recall error. Confidence in own recall accuracy and the length of time spent observing the appeals were also found to be significantly associated with recall accuracy. Initial recall accuracy scores were significantly higher than recall accuracy scores following a three-day break. This exploratory study demonstrates the requirement to improve missing children appeals and lays the foundation for future studies to build on these findings further.

AB - When a child goes missing it is common practice to release an appeal of the child in the hope that a member of the public could help to identify and locate them. Despite being an everyday occurrence, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how effective these appeals are. The present study sought to explore the effectiveness of missing children appeals through the recall accuracy of the general public immediately after observing the appeals and again after a three-day delay. One hundred and eighty-two participants observed either a mock Child Rescue Alert or a mock Twitter appeal. The results found no significant difference in recall accuracy between the design of the appeals although there was a significant difference in recall error. Confidence in own recall accuracy and the length of time spent observing the appeals were also found to be significantly associated with recall accuracy. Initial recall accuracy scores were significantly higher than recall accuracy scores following a three-day break. This exploratory study demonstrates the requirement to improve missing children appeals and lays the foundation for future studies to build on these findings further.

KW - Missing Children

KW - Missing Children Appeal

KW - Missing persons

KW - Missing Persons Appeal

KW - Recall accuracy

KW - Child rescue alerts

KW - Twitter appeal

KW - Child rescue alert

KW - Missing children

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071024743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-019-00403-w

DO - 10.1007/s12144-019-00403-w

M3 - Article

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

ER -