Missives and Deposit in Scots Law: Diachronic and Comparative Reflections about the Concept of Arrha

Pierre de Gioia-Carabellese, Corrado Chessa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A jurisdiction such as the Scottish one, reputedly with solid Roman roots, is practically bereft of the fundamental concept of a deposit in the concluding passage of the missives. Conversely, the relevant 'ancestor' (Roman law) has been profoundly permeated, throughout the course of its history, by the notion of an arrha (the earnest) in the conclusion of a contract annexed to the transfer of heritable properties. Moreover, in contemporary times and outwith Scotland, a Continental jurisdiction (the Italian one) is resolutely lingering on the Roman caparra penitenziale while, ironically, the English system (comprehensively 'un-Roman' in its formation) has expressly adopted the 'deposit' as part of the closing particulars.

These asymmetries, brim-full with inviting legal ingredients, seem, in the present work, to conjure up an intriguing and captivating plot worthy of an Indiana Jones' film, where the lost treasure can be deemed replaceable, for the distracted reader, by the ancient Roman notion of an arrha, so evidently not inherited by the contemporary Scottish jurisprudence. Ultimately, the contribution engenders the usual unsettling query: in the light of the phenomenology of the arrha so neglected in Scotland in contemporary times, is Scottish law still a mixed legal system or, conversely, a jurisdiction progressively getting closer to the English common law counterpart?
LanguageEnglish
Pages367-389
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Business Law Review
Volume28
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
Law
common law
phenomenology
legal system
jurisprudence
asymmetry
history
time

Cite this

Gioia-Carabellese, Pierre de ; Chessa, Corrado. / Missives and Deposit in Scots Law: Diachronic and Comparative Reflections about the Concept of Arrha. In: European Business Law Review. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 367-389.
@article{ff29ba4c64de427f878fcbedeb08558b,
title = "Missives and Deposit in Scots Law: Diachronic and Comparative Reflections about the Concept of Arrha",
abstract = "A jurisdiction such as the Scottish one, reputedly with solid Roman roots, is practically bereft of the fundamental concept of a deposit in the concluding passage of the missives. Conversely, the relevant 'ancestor' (Roman law) has been profoundly permeated, throughout the course of its history, by the notion of an arrha (the earnest) in the conclusion of a contract annexed to the transfer of heritable properties. Moreover, in contemporary times and outwith Scotland, a Continental jurisdiction (the Italian one) is resolutely lingering on the Roman caparra penitenziale while, ironically, the English system (comprehensively 'un-Roman' in its formation) has expressly adopted the 'deposit' as part of the closing particulars. These asymmetries, brim-full with inviting legal ingredients, seem, in the present work, to conjure up an intriguing and captivating plot worthy of an Indiana Jones' film, where the lost treasure can be deemed replaceable, for the distracted reader, by the ancient Roman notion of an arrha, so evidently not inherited by the contemporary Scottish jurisprudence. Ultimately, the contribution engenders the usual unsettling query: in the light of the phenomenology of the arrha so neglected in Scotland in contemporary times, is Scottish law still a mixed legal system or, conversely, a jurisdiction progressively getting closer to the English common law counterpart?",
author = "Gioia-Carabellese, {Pierre de} and Corrado Chessa",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "367--389",
journal = "European Business Law Review",
issn = "0959-6941",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "3",

}

Missives and Deposit in Scots Law: Diachronic and Comparative Reflections about the Concept of Arrha. / Gioia-Carabellese, Pierre de; Chessa, Corrado.

In: European Business Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2017, p. 367-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missives and Deposit in Scots Law: Diachronic and Comparative Reflections about the Concept of Arrha

AU - Gioia-Carabellese, Pierre de

AU - Chessa, Corrado

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - A jurisdiction such as the Scottish one, reputedly with solid Roman roots, is practically bereft of the fundamental concept of a deposit in the concluding passage of the missives. Conversely, the relevant 'ancestor' (Roman law) has been profoundly permeated, throughout the course of its history, by the notion of an arrha (the earnest) in the conclusion of a contract annexed to the transfer of heritable properties. Moreover, in contemporary times and outwith Scotland, a Continental jurisdiction (the Italian one) is resolutely lingering on the Roman caparra penitenziale while, ironically, the English system (comprehensively 'un-Roman' in its formation) has expressly adopted the 'deposit' as part of the closing particulars. These asymmetries, brim-full with inviting legal ingredients, seem, in the present work, to conjure up an intriguing and captivating plot worthy of an Indiana Jones' film, where the lost treasure can be deemed replaceable, for the distracted reader, by the ancient Roman notion of an arrha, so evidently not inherited by the contemporary Scottish jurisprudence. Ultimately, the contribution engenders the usual unsettling query: in the light of the phenomenology of the arrha so neglected in Scotland in contemporary times, is Scottish law still a mixed legal system or, conversely, a jurisdiction progressively getting closer to the English common law counterpart?

AB - A jurisdiction such as the Scottish one, reputedly with solid Roman roots, is practically bereft of the fundamental concept of a deposit in the concluding passage of the missives. Conversely, the relevant 'ancestor' (Roman law) has been profoundly permeated, throughout the course of its history, by the notion of an arrha (the earnest) in the conclusion of a contract annexed to the transfer of heritable properties. Moreover, in contemporary times and outwith Scotland, a Continental jurisdiction (the Italian one) is resolutely lingering on the Roman caparra penitenziale while, ironically, the English system (comprehensively 'un-Roman' in its formation) has expressly adopted the 'deposit' as part of the closing particulars. These asymmetries, brim-full with inviting legal ingredients, seem, in the present work, to conjure up an intriguing and captivating plot worthy of an Indiana Jones' film, where the lost treasure can be deemed replaceable, for the distracted reader, by the ancient Roman notion of an arrha, so evidently not inherited by the contemporary Scottish jurisprudence. Ultimately, the contribution engenders the usual unsettling query: in the light of the phenomenology of the arrha so neglected in Scotland in contemporary times, is Scottish law still a mixed legal system or, conversely, a jurisdiction progressively getting closer to the English common law counterpart?

UR - http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=4&values=Journals~~European+Business+Law+Review

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 367

EP - 389

JO - European Business Law Review

T2 - European Business Law Review

JF - European Business Law Review

SN - 0959-6941

IS - 3

ER -