Mixed methods, materialism and the micropolitics of the research-assemblage

Nick J. Fox, Pam Alldred

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We assess the potential for mixing social research methods, based upon a materialist and micropolitical analysis of the research-assemblage and of what individual research techniques and methods do in practice. Applying a DeleuzoGuattarian toolkit of assemblages, affects and capacities, we document what happens when research methods and techniques interact with the events they wish to study. Micropolitically, many of these techniques and methods have unintended effects of specifying and aggregating events, with the consequently that the knowledge produced by social inquiry is invested with these specifications and aggregations. We argue that rather than abandoning these social research tools, we may use the micropolitical analysis to assess precisely how each method affects knowledge production, and engineer the research designs we use accordingly. This forms the justification for mixing methods that are highly aggregative or specifying with those that are less so, effectively rehabilitating methods that have often been rejected by social researchers, including surveys and experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-204
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volume21
Issue number2
Early online date5 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

micro-politics
materialism
research method
social research
event
knowledge production
aggregation
research planning
engineer
experiment

Cite this

@article{c2a955706b7549aca9efc90c688165c2,
title = "Mixed methods, materialism and the micropolitics of the research-assemblage",
abstract = "We assess the potential for mixing social research methods, based upon a materialist and micropolitical analysis of the research-assemblage and of what individual research techniques and methods do in practice. Applying a DeleuzoGuattarian toolkit of assemblages, affects and capacities, we document what happens when research methods and techniques interact with the events they wish to study. Micropolitically, many of these techniques and methods have unintended effects of specifying and aggregating events, with the consequently that the knowledge produced by social inquiry is invested with these specifications and aggregations. We argue that rather than abandoning these social research tools, we may use the micropolitical analysis to assess precisely how each method affects knowledge production, and engineer the research designs we use accordingly. This forms the justification for mixing methods that are highly aggregative or specifying with those that are less so, effectively rehabilitating methods that have often been rejected by social researchers, including surveys and experiments.",
keywords = "Affect, Assemblage, Micropolitics, Mixed methods, New materialism, Pragmatism",
author = "Fox, {Nick J.} and Pam Alldred",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/13645579.2017.1350015",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "191--204",
journal = "International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice",
issn = "1364-5579",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Mixed methods, materialism and the micropolitics of the research-assemblage. / Fox, Nick J.; Alldred, Pam.

In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 06.07.2018, p. 191-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mixed methods, materialism and the micropolitics of the research-assemblage

AU - Fox, Nick J.

AU - Alldred, Pam

PY - 2018/7/6

Y1 - 2018/7/6

N2 - We assess the potential for mixing social research methods, based upon a materialist and micropolitical analysis of the research-assemblage and of what individual research techniques and methods do in practice. Applying a DeleuzoGuattarian toolkit of assemblages, affects and capacities, we document what happens when research methods and techniques interact with the events they wish to study. Micropolitically, many of these techniques and methods have unintended effects of specifying and aggregating events, with the consequently that the knowledge produced by social inquiry is invested with these specifications and aggregations. We argue that rather than abandoning these social research tools, we may use the micropolitical analysis to assess precisely how each method affects knowledge production, and engineer the research designs we use accordingly. This forms the justification for mixing methods that are highly aggregative or specifying with those that are less so, effectively rehabilitating methods that have often been rejected by social researchers, including surveys and experiments.

AB - We assess the potential for mixing social research methods, based upon a materialist and micropolitical analysis of the research-assemblage and of what individual research techniques and methods do in practice. Applying a DeleuzoGuattarian toolkit of assemblages, affects and capacities, we document what happens when research methods and techniques interact with the events they wish to study. Micropolitically, many of these techniques and methods have unintended effects of specifying and aggregating events, with the consequently that the knowledge produced by social inquiry is invested with these specifications and aggregations. We argue that rather than abandoning these social research tools, we may use the micropolitical analysis to assess precisely how each method affects knowledge production, and engineer the research designs we use accordingly. This forms the justification for mixing methods that are highly aggregative or specifying with those that are less so, effectively rehabilitating methods that have often been rejected by social researchers, including surveys and experiments.

KW - Affect

KW - Assemblage

KW - Micropolitics

KW - Mixed methods

KW - New materialism

KW - Pragmatism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021893005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13645579.2017.1350015

DO - 10.1080/13645579.2017.1350015

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 191

EP - 204

JO - International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice

JF - International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice

SN - 1364-5579

IS - 2

ER -