Models and metaphors: Complexity theory and through-life management in the built environment

John Rooke, Ella Mae Molloy, Murray Sinclair, Lauri Koskela, Mohan Siriwardena, Mike Kagioglou, Carys Siemieniuch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Complexity thinking may have both modelling and metaphorical applications in the through-life management of the built environment. These two distinct approaches are examined and compared. In the first instance, some of the sources of complexity in the design, construction and maintenance of the built environment are identified. The metaphorical use of complexity in management thinking and its application in the built environment are briefly examined. This is followed by an exploration of modelling techniques relevant to built environment concerns. Non-linear and complex mathematical techniques such as fuzzy logic, cellular automata and attractors, may be applicable to their analysis. Existing software tools are identified and examples of successful built environment applications of complexity modelling are given. Some issues that arise include the definition of phenomena in a mathematically usable way, the functionality of available software and the possibility of going beyond representational modelling. Further questions arising from the application of complexity thinking are discussed, including the possibilities for confusion that arise from the use of metaphor. The metaphor of a ‘commentary machine’ is suggested as a possible way forward and it is suggested that an appropriate linguistic analysis can in certain situations reduce perceived complexity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-57
Number of pages11
JournalArchitectural Engineering and Design Management
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Cite this