Modernism: the people's music?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Literary historian Rachel Potter has argued for ‘two genealogies of modernism’: the first is marked by hostility to a mass public and everyday life; the other champions democracy and the popular voice. This chapter examines the second of these two genealogies, as it manifests itself in music. What happens when music that rejects fundamental aspects of culturally dominant musical styles does so in the name of ‘the people’? Drawing upon a range of examples including early Soviet modernism, post-war Italian communist composition, African-American free jazz and contemporary noise music, my chapter critically surveys the different stances that have been taken by musicians on this question. I then proceed to address two persistent problems that confront any progressive musician wishing to make the case that their practice serves the popular cause. The first of these is difficulty: what places do pleasure and challenge occupy in modernist music, and how might the apparent chasm between practitioners’ and audiences’ experiences be bridged? The second is difference: how does the modernist impulse to contest mainstream culture contend with the present-day heterogeneity of differing cultural norms, subject positions and concepts of the aesthetic?
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music
EditorsBjörn Heile, Charles Wilson
PublisherRoutledge
ISBN (Print)9781472470409
Publication statusPublished - 11 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Music
Modernist
Musicians
Genealogy
Hostility
African Americans
Pleasure
Public Life
Literary Historians
Causes
Fundamental
Contests
Impulse
Champions
Democracy
Everyday Life
Musical Style
Free Jazz
Aesthetics
Stance

Cite this

Adlington, R. (2018). Modernism: the people's music? In B. Heile, & C. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music Routledge.
Adlington, Robert. / Modernism: the people's music?. The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music. editor / Björn Heile ; Charles Wilson. Routledge, 2018.
@inbook{a5b1b55b0fb94f6092326f7cd8b248c0,
title = "Modernism: the people's music?",
abstract = "Literary historian Rachel Potter has argued for ‘two genealogies of modernism’: the first is marked by hostility to a mass public and everyday life; the other champions democracy and the popular voice. This chapter examines the second of these two genealogies, as it manifests itself in music. What happens when music that rejects fundamental aspects of culturally dominant musical styles does so in the name of ‘the people’? Drawing upon a range of examples including early Soviet modernism, post-war Italian communist composition, African-American free jazz and contemporary noise music, my chapter critically surveys the different stances that have been taken by musicians on this question. I then proceed to address two persistent problems that confront any progressive musician wishing to make the case that their practice serves the popular cause. The first of these is difficulty: what places do pleasure and challenge occupy in modernist music, and how might the apparent chasm between practitioners’ and audiences’ experiences be bridged? The second is difference: how does the modernist impulse to contest mainstream culture contend with the present-day heterogeneity of differing cultural norms, subject positions and concepts of the aesthetic?",
author = "Robert Adlington",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "11",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781472470409",
editor = "Bj{\"o}rn Heile and Charles Wilson",
booktitle = "The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Adlington, R 2018, Modernism: the people's music? in B Heile & C Wilson (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music. Routledge.

Modernism: the people's music? / Adlington, Robert.

The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music. ed. / Björn Heile; Charles Wilson. Routledge, 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Modernism: the people's music?

AU - Adlington, Robert

PY - 2018/9/11

Y1 - 2018/9/11

N2 - Literary historian Rachel Potter has argued for ‘two genealogies of modernism’: the first is marked by hostility to a mass public and everyday life; the other champions democracy and the popular voice. This chapter examines the second of these two genealogies, as it manifests itself in music. What happens when music that rejects fundamental aspects of culturally dominant musical styles does so in the name of ‘the people’? Drawing upon a range of examples including early Soviet modernism, post-war Italian communist composition, African-American free jazz and contemporary noise music, my chapter critically surveys the different stances that have been taken by musicians on this question. I then proceed to address two persistent problems that confront any progressive musician wishing to make the case that their practice serves the popular cause. The first of these is difficulty: what places do pleasure and challenge occupy in modernist music, and how might the apparent chasm between practitioners’ and audiences’ experiences be bridged? The second is difference: how does the modernist impulse to contest mainstream culture contend with the present-day heterogeneity of differing cultural norms, subject positions and concepts of the aesthetic?

AB - Literary historian Rachel Potter has argued for ‘two genealogies of modernism’: the first is marked by hostility to a mass public and everyday life; the other champions democracy and the popular voice. This chapter examines the second of these two genealogies, as it manifests itself in music. What happens when music that rejects fundamental aspects of culturally dominant musical styles does so in the name of ‘the people’? Drawing upon a range of examples including early Soviet modernism, post-war Italian communist composition, African-American free jazz and contemporary noise music, my chapter critically surveys the different stances that have been taken by musicians on this question. I then proceed to address two persistent problems that confront any progressive musician wishing to make the case that their practice serves the popular cause. The first of these is difficulty: what places do pleasure and challenge occupy in modernist music, and how might the apparent chasm between practitioners’ and audiences’ experiences be bridged? The second is difference: how does the modernist impulse to contest mainstream culture contend with the present-day heterogeneity of differing cultural norms, subject positions and concepts of the aesthetic?

UR - https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Research-Companion-to-Modernism-in-Music/Heile-Wilson/p/book/9781472470409

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781472470409

BT - The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music

A2 - Heile, Björn

A2 - Wilson, Charles

PB - Routledge

ER -

Adlington R. Modernism: the people's music? In Heile B, Wilson C, editors, The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music. Routledge. 2018