Moving on from 'anti-racism'? Understandings of 'community cohesion' held by youth workers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

'Community Cohesion', and the apparent lack of it, was rapidly offered as the explanation for the 2001 disturbances across northern England, and has since become a cornerstone of government approaches to race relations policy. This article explores what Community Cohesion means to welfare practitioners in Oldham, one of the affected towns. Academic discussion of Community Cohesion has been largely hostile, focusing on the language and assumptions of the government reports. While highlighting important issues, these debates have been virtually free of empirical evidence on how Community Cohesion is actually being understood and operationalised by welfare practitioners. Drawing on in-depth research with youth workers in Oldham, I argue that the Community Cohesion analysis of the state of race relations is largely accepted, and supported, by those youth workers, and that it has enabled a significant shift in the assumptions and operations of their professional practice. Within this 'modal shift'in practice is a moving away from the language and assumptions of 'anti-racism', as it has been largely understood and operationalised by youth workers on the ground, towards what I argue can be seen as 'critical multi-culturalism'.

LanguageEnglish
Pages435-455
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Social Policy
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

youth worker
anti-racism
racism
cohesion
community
welfare
language
town
youth
disturbance
lack
evidence

Cite this

@article{4e8189f4760b40dbb3e97d4438e0f83b,
title = "Moving on from 'anti-racism'? Understandings of 'community cohesion' held by youth workers",
abstract = "'Community Cohesion', and the apparent lack of it, was rapidly offered as the explanation for the 2001 disturbances across northern England, and has since become a cornerstone of government approaches to race relations policy. This article explores what Community Cohesion means to welfare practitioners in Oldham, one of the affected towns. Academic discussion of Community Cohesion has been largely hostile, focusing on the language and assumptions of the government reports. While highlighting important issues, these debates have been virtually free of empirical evidence on how Community Cohesion is actually being understood and operationalised by welfare practitioners. Drawing on in-depth research with youth workers in Oldham, I argue that the Community Cohesion analysis of the state of race relations is largely accepted, and supported, by those youth workers, and that it has enabled a significant shift in the assumptions and operations of their professional practice. Within this 'modal shift'in practice is a moving away from the language and assumptions of 'anti-racism', as it has been largely understood and operationalised by youth workers on the ground, towards what I argue can be seen as 'critical multi-culturalism'.",
author = "Paul Thomas",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0047279407001080",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "435--455",
journal = "Journal of Social Policy",
issn = "0047-2794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Moving on from 'anti-racism'? Understandings of 'community cohesion' held by youth workers. / Thomas, Paul.

In: Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 36, No. 3, 07.2007, p. 435-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving on from 'anti-racism'? Understandings of 'community cohesion' held by youth workers

AU - Thomas, Paul

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - 'Community Cohesion', and the apparent lack of it, was rapidly offered as the explanation for the 2001 disturbances across northern England, and has since become a cornerstone of government approaches to race relations policy. This article explores what Community Cohesion means to welfare practitioners in Oldham, one of the affected towns. Academic discussion of Community Cohesion has been largely hostile, focusing on the language and assumptions of the government reports. While highlighting important issues, these debates have been virtually free of empirical evidence on how Community Cohesion is actually being understood and operationalised by welfare practitioners. Drawing on in-depth research with youth workers in Oldham, I argue that the Community Cohesion analysis of the state of race relations is largely accepted, and supported, by those youth workers, and that it has enabled a significant shift in the assumptions and operations of their professional practice. Within this 'modal shift'in practice is a moving away from the language and assumptions of 'anti-racism', as it has been largely understood and operationalised by youth workers on the ground, towards what I argue can be seen as 'critical multi-culturalism'.

AB - 'Community Cohesion', and the apparent lack of it, was rapidly offered as the explanation for the 2001 disturbances across northern England, and has since become a cornerstone of government approaches to race relations policy. This article explores what Community Cohesion means to welfare practitioners in Oldham, one of the affected towns. Academic discussion of Community Cohesion has been largely hostile, focusing on the language and assumptions of the government reports. While highlighting important issues, these debates have been virtually free of empirical evidence on how Community Cohesion is actually being understood and operationalised by welfare practitioners. Drawing on in-depth research with youth workers in Oldham, I argue that the Community Cohesion analysis of the state of race relations is largely accepted, and supported, by those youth workers, and that it has enabled a significant shift in the assumptions and operations of their professional practice. Within this 'modal shift'in practice is a moving away from the language and assumptions of 'anti-racism', as it has been largely understood and operationalised by youth workers on the ground, towards what I argue can be seen as 'critical multi-culturalism'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250365799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0047279407001080

DO - 10.1017/S0047279407001080

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 435

EP - 455

JO - Journal of Social Policy

T2 - Journal of Social Policy

JF - Journal of Social Policy

SN - 0047-2794

IS - 3

ER -