Moving to the Music: Learning Processes, Training and Productive Systems – The Case of Exercise to Music Instruction: Learning as Work Research Paper, No. 6 June 2006

Alan Felstead, Daniel Bishop, Alison Fuller, Nick Jewson, Tracey Yeadon-Lee, Lorna Unwin

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Closing the productivity gap with other nations has become a mantra of public policy in the UK since the late 1990s. Promoting participation in learning and training is seen as the principal means of narrowing the gap. While tracking episodes of training is relatively easy, it is not clear what is learnt, by whom and why. This paper examines these questions among a specific occupational group – exercise to music instructors – whose numbers have grown significantly in recent years. It identifies two productive systems through which these exercise classes are delivered. Each has different consequences for learning. Under one regime, training expands horizons and develops abilities, while under the second instructors are taught to conform and follow scripts written by others. The paper argues that ‘training’ can lead to different learning outcomes and that these are best understood through an analysis of the productive process which puts training and learning in context.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherCardiff University
Number of pages45
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

work research
learning process
music
instruction
learning
instructor
occupational group
public policy
productivity
regime
participation
ability

Cite this

@techreport{fffae3402337401d9a6c0f57c26d30be,
title = "Moving to the Music: Learning Processes, Training and Productive Systems – The Case of Exercise to Music Instruction: Learning as Work Research Paper, No. 6 June 2006",
abstract = "Closing the productivity gap with other nations has become a mantra of public policy in the UK since the late 1990s. Promoting participation in learning and training is seen as the principal means of narrowing the gap. While tracking episodes of training is relatively easy, it is not clear what is learnt, by whom and why. This paper examines these questions among a specific occupational group – exercise to music instructors – whose numbers have grown significantly in recent years. It identifies two productive systems through which these exercise classes are delivered. Each has different consequences for learning. Under one regime, training expands horizons and develops abilities, while under the second instructors are taught to conform and follow scripts written by others. The paper argues that ‘training’ can lead to different learning outcomes and that these are best understood through an analysis of the productive process which puts training and learning in context.",
author = "Alan Felstead and Daniel Bishop and Alison Fuller and Nick Jewson and Tracey Yeadon-Lee and Lorna Unwin",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
language = "English",
publisher = "Cardiff University",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Cardiff University",

}

Moving to the Music: Learning Processes, Training and Productive Systems – The Case of Exercise to Music Instruction : Learning as Work Research Paper, No. 6 June 2006. / Felstead, Alan; Bishop, Daniel; Fuller, Alison ; Jewson, Nick; Yeadon-Lee, Tracey; Unwin, Lorna.

Cardiff University, 2006.

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Moving to the Music: Learning Processes, Training and Productive Systems – The Case of Exercise to Music Instruction

T2 - Learning as Work Research Paper, No. 6 June 2006

AU - Felstead, Alan

AU - Bishop, Daniel

AU - Fuller, Alison

AU - Jewson, Nick

AU - Yeadon-Lee, Tracey

AU - Unwin, Lorna

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Closing the productivity gap with other nations has become a mantra of public policy in the UK since the late 1990s. Promoting participation in learning and training is seen as the principal means of narrowing the gap. While tracking episodes of training is relatively easy, it is not clear what is learnt, by whom and why. This paper examines these questions among a specific occupational group – exercise to music instructors – whose numbers have grown significantly in recent years. It identifies two productive systems through which these exercise classes are delivered. Each has different consequences for learning. Under one regime, training expands horizons and develops abilities, while under the second instructors are taught to conform and follow scripts written by others. The paper argues that ‘training’ can lead to different learning outcomes and that these are best understood through an analysis of the productive process which puts training and learning in context.

AB - Closing the productivity gap with other nations has become a mantra of public policy in the UK since the late 1990s. Promoting participation in learning and training is seen as the principal means of narrowing the gap. While tracking episodes of training is relatively easy, it is not clear what is learnt, by whom and why. This paper examines these questions among a specific occupational group – exercise to music instructors – whose numbers have grown significantly in recent years. It identifies two productive systems through which these exercise classes are delivered. Each has different consequences for learning. Under one regime, training expands horizons and develops abilities, while under the second instructors are taught to conform and follow scripts written by others. The paper argues that ‘training’ can lead to different learning outcomes and that these are best understood through an analysis of the productive process which puts training and learning in context.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Moving to the Music: Learning Processes, Training and Productive Systems – The Case of Exercise to Music Instruction

PB - Cardiff University

ER -