Narrating Britain's War: A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War

Daniel Travers, Paul Ward

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Memories of the Second World War have been central to understandings of Britishness in the post-war period. During the war itself, there was a concerted effort by the state to produce an unproblematic narrative of the war as Britons standing alone in adversity. At the centre of the development of this war story was Winston Churchill, the charismatic leader of the people, whose lionization proved pivotal to creation of the British national war story. Elements of the war considered to be in the spirit of ‘Britishness’ were deliberately maintained by national consensus. Aspects such as the snatching victory from the jaws of defeat at Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain and the Blitz, rationing, evacuation, social levelling, and the ‘make do and mend’ attitude, became the accepted version of the war experience, while divisive and tangential aspects of the war were marginalized. National commemorations over subsequent decades both drew from and reasserted this particular experience. Historians too played a part in the construction of the British war narrative: A.J.P. Taylor described Churchill as ‘the saviour of his country’ and Richard Titmuss’s official history of the war encouraged the interpretation that a ‘People’s War’ had created a People’s Peace in the British welfare state. As early as the 1960s however, some historians set about deconstructing the ‘myth of the Blitz’ as Angus Calder called it. Some like Clive Ponting looked purely for historical accuracy, pointing out every discrepancy he could find in 1940: Myth and Reality (1990). Other historians, like Malcolm Smith and Mark Connelly became interested in the meaning of the myths surrounding the war and what they meant for British national culture. This chapter will explore both the wartime construction of the myth and the role of historians in its discussion.
Furthermore, it explores the continuing engagement of British society with the Second World War through commemoration and memorialisation. It considers the complexities of the public history of the Second World War by taking a ‘four nations and more’ approach. It considers how the ‘Churchill paradigm’ masks the assertion of local, regional and national identities through commemoration of the diverse experiences of war across the United Kingdom.
The traditional British war narrative suggests unity and uniformity yet the experiences of ‘alien’ communities like the Italians and West Indians, alongside regional experiences in the Channel Islands (conquered by Nazi Germany), the Isle of Man (used as an island prison), and Northern Ireland (where rhetoric of unity was resisted by a Protestant Unionist government seeking to maintain its exclusivity), suggest that a nuanced understanding is necessary to unpick the real significance of memories of war in the formation of British identities. This chapter will take an inclusive look at the United Kingdom and its people, gauging the acceptance of the Churchillian paradigm in populations which it has seemed to marginalise and in regions whose distinct history diverges from the ‘accepted’ version of events.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Long Aftermath
Subtitle of host publicationCultural Legacies of Europe at War, 1936-2016
EditorsManuel Bragança, Peter Tame
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherBerghahn Books
Pages77-95
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781782381549
ISBN (Print)9781782381532
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Publication series

NameContemporary European History
PublisherBerghahn
Volume17

Fingerprint

Winston Churchill
Historian
Commemoration
Second World War
Britishness
Paradigm
Unity
Nazi Germany
Saviour
Regional Identity
Unionists
Historical Accuracy
National Cultures
Acceptance
Post-war Period
Peace
Prison
Local Identity
Defeat
Memorialization

Cite this

Travers, D., & Ward, P. (2015). Narrating Britain's War: A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War. In M. Bragança, & P. Tame (Eds.), The Long Aftermath: Cultural Legacies of Europe at War, 1936-2016 (pp. 77-95). (Contemporary European History; Vol. 17). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Travers, Daniel ; Ward, Paul. / Narrating Britain's War : A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War. The Long Aftermath: Cultural Legacies of Europe at War, 1936-2016. editor / Manuel Bragança ; Peter Tame. Oxford : Berghahn Books, 2015. pp. 77-95 (Contemporary European History).
@inbook{11fa7ecdb42e414a8eed129b0f263418,
title = "Narrating Britain's War: A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War",
abstract = "Memories of the Second World War have been central to understandings of Britishness in the post-war period. During the war itself, there was a concerted effort by the state to produce an unproblematic narrative of the war as Britons standing alone in adversity. At the centre of the development of this war story was Winston Churchill, the charismatic leader of the people, whose lionization proved pivotal to creation of the British national war story. Elements of the war considered to be in the spirit of ‘Britishness’ were deliberately maintained by national consensus. Aspects such as the snatching victory from the jaws of defeat at Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain and the Blitz, rationing, evacuation, social levelling, and the ‘make do and mend’ attitude, became the accepted version of the war experience, while divisive and tangential aspects of the war were marginalized. National commemorations over subsequent decades both drew from and reasserted this particular experience. Historians too played a part in the construction of the British war narrative: A.J.P. Taylor described Churchill as ‘the saviour of his country’ and Richard Titmuss’s official history of the war encouraged the interpretation that a ‘People’s War’ had created a People’s Peace in the British welfare state. As early as the 1960s however, some historians set about deconstructing the ‘myth of the Blitz’ as Angus Calder called it. Some like Clive Ponting looked purely for historical accuracy, pointing out every discrepancy he could find in 1940: Myth and Reality (1990). Other historians, like Malcolm Smith and Mark Connelly became interested in the meaning of the myths surrounding the war and what they meant for British national culture. This chapter will explore both the wartime construction of the myth and the role of historians in its discussion. Furthermore, it explores the continuing engagement of British society with the Second World War through commemoration and memorialisation. It considers the complexities of the public history of the Second World War by taking a ‘four nations and more’ approach. It considers how the ‘Churchill paradigm’ masks the assertion of local, regional and national identities through commemoration of the diverse experiences of war across the United Kingdom. The traditional British war narrative suggests unity and uniformity yet the experiences of ‘alien’ communities like the Italians and West Indians, alongside regional experiences in the Channel Islands (conquered by Nazi Germany), the Isle of Man (used as an island prison), and Northern Ireland (where rhetoric of unity was resisted by a Protestant Unionist government seeking to maintain its exclusivity), suggest that a nuanced understanding is necessary to unpick the real significance of memories of war in the formation of British identities. This chapter will take an inclusive look at the United Kingdom and its people, gauging the acceptance of the Churchillian paradigm in populations which it has seemed to marginalise and in regions whose distinct history diverges from the ‘accepted’ version of events.",
keywords = "European history, Second World War",
author = "Daniel Travers and Paul Ward",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781782381532",
series = "Contemporary European History",
publisher = "Berghahn Books",
pages = "77--95",
editor = "Manuel Bragan{\cc}a and Peter Tame",
booktitle = "The Long Aftermath",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Travers, D & Ward, P 2015, Narrating Britain's War: A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War. in M Bragança & P Tame (eds), The Long Aftermath: Cultural Legacies of Europe at War, 1936-2016. Contemporary European History, vol. 17, Berghahn Books, Oxford, pp. 77-95.

Narrating Britain's War : A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War. / Travers, Daniel; Ward, Paul.

The Long Aftermath: Cultural Legacies of Europe at War, 1936-2016. ed. / Manuel Bragança; Peter Tame. Oxford : Berghahn Books, 2015. p. 77-95 (Contemporary European History; Vol. 17).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Narrating Britain's War

T2 - A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War

AU - Travers, Daniel

AU - Ward, Paul

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Memories of the Second World War have been central to understandings of Britishness in the post-war period. During the war itself, there was a concerted effort by the state to produce an unproblematic narrative of the war as Britons standing alone in adversity. At the centre of the development of this war story was Winston Churchill, the charismatic leader of the people, whose lionization proved pivotal to creation of the British national war story. Elements of the war considered to be in the spirit of ‘Britishness’ were deliberately maintained by national consensus. Aspects such as the snatching victory from the jaws of defeat at Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain and the Blitz, rationing, evacuation, social levelling, and the ‘make do and mend’ attitude, became the accepted version of the war experience, while divisive and tangential aspects of the war were marginalized. National commemorations over subsequent decades both drew from and reasserted this particular experience. Historians too played a part in the construction of the British war narrative: A.J.P. Taylor described Churchill as ‘the saviour of his country’ and Richard Titmuss’s official history of the war encouraged the interpretation that a ‘People’s War’ had created a People’s Peace in the British welfare state. As early as the 1960s however, some historians set about deconstructing the ‘myth of the Blitz’ as Angus Calder called it. Some like Clive Ponting looked purely for historical accuracy, pointing out every discrepancy he could find in 1940: Myth and Reality (1990). Other historians, like Malcolm Smith and Mark Connelly became interested in the meaning of the myths surrounding the war and what they meant for British national culture. This chapter will explore both the wartime construction of the myth and the role of historians in its discussion. Furthermore, it explores the continuing engagement of British society with the Second World War through commemoration and memorialisation. It considers the complexities of the public history of the Second World War by taking a ‘four nations and more’ approach. It considers how the ‘Churchill paradigm’ masks the assertion of local, regional and national identities through commemoration of the diverse experiences of war across the United Kingdom. The traditional British war narrative suggests unity and uniformity yet the experiences of ‘alien’ communities like the Italians and West Indians, alongside regional experiences in the Channel Islands (conquered by Nazi Germany), the Isle of Man (used as an island prison), and Northern Ireland (where rhetoric of unity was resisted by a Protestant Unionist government seeking to maintain its exclusivity), suggest that a nuanced understanding is necessary to unpick the real significance of memories of war in the formation of British identities. This chapter will take an inclusive look at the United Kingdom and its people, gauging the acceptance of the Churchillian paradigm in populations which it has seemed to marginalise and in regions whose distinct history diverges from the ‘accepted’ version of events.

AB - Memories of the Second World War have been central to understandings of Britishness in the post-war period. During the war itself, there was a concerted effort by the state to produce an unproblematic narrative of the war as Britons standing alone in adversity. At the centre of the development of this war story was Winston Churchill, the charismatic leader of the people, whose lionization proved pivotal to creation of the British national war story. Elements of the war considered to be in the spirit of ‘Britishness’ were deliberately maintained by national consensus. Aspects such as the snatching victory from the jaws of defeat at Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain and the Blitz, rationing, evacuation, social levelling, and the ‘make do and mend’ attitude, became the accepted version of the war experience, while divisive and tangential aspects of the war were marginalized. National commemorations over subsequent decades both drew from and reasserted this particular experience. Historians too played a part in the construction of the British war narrative: A.J.P. Taylor described Churchill as ‘the saviour of his country’ and Richard Titmuss’s official history of the war encouraged the interpretation that a ‘People’s War’ had created a People’s Peace in the British welfare state. As early as the 1960s however, some historians set about deconstructing the ‘myth of the Blitz’ as Angus Calder called it. Some like Clive Ponting looked purely for historical accuracy, pointing out every discrepancy he could find in 1940: Myth and Reality (1990). Other historians, like Malcolm Smith and Mark Connelly became interested in the meaning of the myths surrounding the war and what they meant for British national culture. This chapter will explore both the wartime construction of the myth and the role of historians in its discussion. Furthermore, it explores the continuing engagement of British society with the Second World War through commemoration and memorialisation. It considers the complexities of the public history of the Second World War by taking a ‘four nations and more’ approach. It considers how the ‘Churchill paradigm’ masks the assertion of local, regional and national identities through commemoration of the diverse experiences of war across the United Kingdom. The traditional British war narrative suggests unity and uniformity yet the experiences of ‘alien’ communities like the Italians and West Indians, alongside regional experiences in the Channel Islands (conquered by Nazi Germany), the Isle of Man (used as an island prison), and Northern Ireland (where rhetoric of unity was resisted by a Protestant Unionist government seeking to maintain its exclusivity), suggest that a nuanced understanding is necessary to unpick the real significance of memories of war in the formation of British identities. This chapter will take an inclusive look at the United Kingdom and its people, gauging the acceptance of the Churchillian paradigm in populations which it has seemed to marginalise and in regions whose distinct history diverges from the ‘accepted’ version of events.

KW - European history

KW - Second World War

UR - http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/BragancaLong#toc

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781782381532

T3 - Contemporary European History

SP - 77

EP - 95

BT - The Long Aftermath

A2 - Bragança, Manuel

A2 - Tame, Peter

PB - Berghahn Books

CY - Oxford

ER -

Travers D, Ward P. Narrating Britain's War: A 'Four Nations and More' Approach to the People's War. In Bragança M, Tame P, editors, The Long Aftermath: Cultural Legacies of Europe at War, 1936-2016. Oxford: Berghahn Books. 2015. p. 77-95. (Contemporary European History).