National Human Research Ethics

A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden

Bernard Gallagher, Anne H. Berman, Justyna Bieganski, Adele D. Jones, Liliana Foca, Ben Raikes, Johanna Schiratzki, Mirjam Urban, Sara Ullman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although international research is increasing in volume and importance, there remains a dearth of knowledge on similarities and differences in “national human research ethics” (NHREs), that is, national ethical guidelines (NEGs), Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and research stakeholder’ ethical attitudes and behaviors (EABs). We begin to address this situation by reporting upon our experiences in conducting a multinational study into the mental health of children who had a parent/carer in prison. The study was conducted in 4 countries: Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. Data on NHREs were gathered via a questionnaire survey, two ethics-related seminars, and ongoing contact between members of the research consortium. There was correspondence but even more so divergence between countries in the availability of NEGs and IRBs and in researcher’ EABs. Differences in NHREs have implications particularly in terms of harmonization but also for ethical philosophy and practice and for research integrity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-606
Number of pages21
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Research Ethics
Romania
Sweden
Germany
Research Ethics Committees
Research
Guidelines
Prisons
Ethics
Caregivers
Mental Health
Research Personnel
United Kingdom

Cite this

Gallagher, Bernard ; Berman, Anne H. ; Bieganski, Justyna ; Jones, Adele D. ; Foca, Liliana ; Raikes, Ben ; Schiratzki, Johanna ; Urban, Mirjam ; Ullman, Sara. / National Human Research Ethics : A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. In: Ethics and Behavior. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 7. pp. 586-606.
@article{ae019f2b222c4d8d832c59c4111d770c,
title = "National Human Research Ethics: A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden",
abstract = "Although international research is increasing in volume and importance, there remains a dearth of knowledge on similarities and differences in “national human research ethics” (NHREs), that is, national ethical guidelines (NEGs), Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and research stakeholder’ ethical attitudes and behaviors (EABs). We begin to address this situation by reporting upon our experiences in conducting a multinational study into the mental health of children who had a parent/carer in prison. The study was conducted in 4 countries: Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. Data on NHREs were gathered via a questionnaire survey, two ethics-related seminars, and ongoing contact between members of the research consortium. There was correspondence but even more so divergence between countries in the availability of NEGs and IRBs and in researcher’ EABs. Differences in NHREs have implications particularly in terms of harmonization but also for ethical philosophy and practice and for research integrity.",
keywords = "ethical attitudes, ethical behavior, ethical guidelines, Institutional Review Boards, national human research ethics",
author = "Bernard Gallagher and Berman, {Anne H.} and Justyna Bieganski and Jones, {Adele D.} and Liliana Foca and Ben Raikes and Johanna Schiratzki and Mirjam Urban and Sara Ullman",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10508422.2015.1096207",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "586--606",
journal = "Ethics and Behavior",
issn = "1050-8422",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

National Human Research Ethics : A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. / Gallagher, Bernard; Berman, Anne H.; Bieganski, Justyna; Jones, Adele D.; Foca, Liliana; Raikes, Ben; Schiratzki, Johanna; Urban, Mirjam; Ullman, Sara.

In: Ethics and Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 7, 02.10.2016, p. 586-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - National Human Research Ethics

T2 - A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden

AU - Gallagher, Bernard

AU - Berman, Anne H.

AU - Bieganski, Justyna

AU - Jones, Adele D.

AU - Foca, Liliana

AU - Raikes, Ben

AU - Schiratzki, Johanna

AU - Urban, Mirjam

AU - Ullman, Sara

PY - 2016/10/2

Y1 - 2016/10/2

N2 - Although international research is increasing in volume and importance, there remains a dearth of knowledge on similarities and differences in “national human research ethics” (NHREs), that is, national ethical guidelines (NEGs), Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and research stakeholder’ ethical attitudes and behaviors (EABs). We begin to address this situation by reporting upon our experiences in conducting a multinational study into the mental health of children who had a parent/carer in prison. The study was conducted in 4 countries: Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. Data on NHREs were gathered via a questionnaire survey, two ethics-related seminars, and ongoing contact between members of the research consortium. There was correspondence but even more so divergence between countries in the availability of NEGs and IRBs and in researcher’ EABs. Differences in NHREs have implications particularly in terms of harmonization but also for ethical philosophy and practice and for research integrity.

AB - Although international research is increasing in volume and importance, there remains a dearth of knowledge on similarities and differences in “national human research ethics” (NHREs), that is, national ethical guidelines (NEGs), Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and research stakeholder’ ethical attitudes and behaviors (EABs). We begin to address this situation by reporting upon our experiences in conducting a multinational study into the mental health of children who had a parent/carer in prison. The study was conducted in 4 countries: Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. Data on NHREs were gathered via a questionnaire survey, two ethics-related seminars, and ongoing contact between members of the research consortium. There was correspondence but even more so divergence between countries in the availability of NEGs and IRBs and in researcher’ EABs. Differences in NHREs have implications particularly in terms of harmonization but also for ethical philosophy and practice and for research integrity.

KW - ethical attitudes

KW - ethical behavior

KW - ethical guidelines

KW - Institutional Review Boards

KW - national human research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947936504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508422.2015.1096207

DO - 10.1080/10508422.2015.1096207

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 586

EP - 606

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

SN - 1050-8422

IS - 7

ER -