Abstract
This chapter focuses on the relationship between impact and public engagement. I argue in favour of a greater consideration of public engagement activities in the assessment of impact, and in so doing I discuss the issues associated with developing strong stakeholder relationships. These include, for example, the fact that different stakeholders will have different perceptions of academia and the university, and that these perceptions need to be addressed when developing partnerships. I also consider some of the pitfalls of public engagement, as well as some of the difficulties associated with developing public-facing research projects. These include the problem of ‘kneejerk linguistics’; that is, doing linguistic research in immediate response to some sociocultural event. I discuss some of the reputational risks that this involves as well as the problems associated with publishing popular summaries of linguistic research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Applying Linguistics |
| Subtitle of host publication | Language and the Impact Agenda |
| Editors | Dan McIntyre, Hazel Price |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 4 |
| Pages | 41-52 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781351055178, 9781351055185 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138237506, 9781138237513 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Apr 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating the peripheries of impact: Public engagement and the problem of kneejerk linguistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 5 Citations
- 1 Book
-
Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda
McIntyre, D. (Editor) & Price, H. (Editor), 9 Apr 2018, 1 ed. Routledge. 212 p.Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver