TY - JOUR
T1 - Near-isogenic lines of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) that differ in milling ease
T2 - differences in chemical composition
AU - Wood, Jennifer A.
AU - Knights, Edmund J.
AU - Campbell, Grant M.
AU - Choct, Mingan
N1 - Not OA compliant; output not on ePrints SH 21/9/17.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Milling performance is an important attribute for desi chickpea and other pulses, as varieties that are more difficult-to-mill lead to processing yield loss and damage to the resulting split cotyledons (dhal) such as chipping and abrasion which are unattractive to the consumer. Poor milling performance leads to poor dhal quality and therefore lower prices and profitability along the pulse value chain. The Pulse Breeding Australia Chickpea Program identified near-isogenic desi lines that differed in seed shape and milling yields, however it was unknown whether this was due simply to a difference in physical forces on the seed during milling, mediated by seed shape, or whether there were underlying differences in chemical composition that could explain these differences. The two isolines differed in the composition of their seed coat, cotyledons and adjoining surfaces. Some of these differences were in agreement with previous research on composition of easy- and difficult-to-mill samples. These differences suggest that biochemical adhesive or cohesive mechanisms at the interface of seed tissues involve pectic polysaccharides and lignin-mediated binding.
AB - Milling performance is an important attribute for desi chickpea and other pulses, as varieties that are more difficult-to-mill lead to processing yield loss and damage to the resulting split cotyledons (dhal) such as chipping and abrasion which are unattractive to the consumer. Poor milling performance leads to poor dhal quality and therefore lower prices and profitability along the pulse value chain. The Pulse Breeding Australia Chickpea Program identified near-isogenic desi lines that differed in seed shape and milling yields, however it was unknown whether this was due simply to a difference in physical forces on the seed during milling, mediated by seed shape, or whether there were underlying differences in chemical composition that could explain these differences. The two isolines differed in the composition of their seed coat, cotyledons and adjoining surfaces. Some of these differences were in agreement with previous research on composition of easy- and difficult-to-mill samples. These differences suggest that biochemical adhesive or cohesive mechanisms at the interface of seed tissues involve pectic polysaccharides and lignin-mediated binding.
KW - Chemical composition
KW - Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
KW - Milling performance
KW - Minerals
KW - Non starch polysaccharides
KW - Pulse (grain legume)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008600439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13197-016-2483-6
DO - 10.1007/s13197-016-2483-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008600439
VL - 54
SP - 1002
EP - 1013
JO - Journal of Food Science and Technology
JF - Journal of Food Science and Technology
SN - 0022-1155
IS - 4
ER -