Need for alternative research approaches in construction management: Case of delay studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the years, there have been many studies of delay in construction, and this type of study continues to be popular in construction management research. A synthesis and critical evaluation of delay studies in developing countries reveals that poor project management is cited as one of the main causes of delay. However, despite significant consensus, most published studies fall short of providing clear recommendations for the improvement of project management practice. Moreover, the majority of recommendations are general and not devoted to solving the difficulties associated with particular causes of delay. This paper aims to demonstrate that the root cause of this state of affairs is that typical research into delay tends to be descriptive and explanatory, making it inadequate for solving persistent managerial problems in construction. It is contended that many problems in construction could be mitigated through alternative research approaches, i.e., action and constructive research. Such prescriptive research methods can assist in the development and implementation of innovative tools tackling managerial problems of construction, including that of delay. In so doing, those methods will better connect research and practice, and thus strengthen the relevance of academic construction management.
LanguageEnglish
Pages407-413
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Project management
Developing countries
Construction management
Management research
Research methods
Evaluation
Management practices

Cite this

@article{da633cdb900f4c43a8c6bbacd376fe5c,
title = "Need for alternative research approaches in construction management: Case of delay studies",
abstract = "Over the years, there have been many studies of delay in construction, and this type of study continues to be popular in construction management research. A synthesis and critical evaluation of delay studies in developing countries reveals that poor project management is cited as one of the main causes of delay. However, despite significant consensus, most published studies fall short of providing clear recommendations for the improvement of project management practice. Moreover, the majority of recommendations are general and not devoted to solving the difficulties associated with particular causes of delay. This paper aims to demonstrate that the root cause of this state of affairs is that typical research into delay tends to be descriptive and explanatory, making it inadequate for solving persistent managerial problems in construction. It is contended that many problems in construction could be mitigated through alternative research approaches, i.e., action and constructive research. Such prescriptive research methods can assist in the development and implementation of innovative tools tackling managerial problems of construction, including that of delay. In so doing, those methods will better connect research and practice, and thus strengthen the relevance of academic construction management.",
keywords = "Action research, Construction delay, Constructive research",
author = "Abdullah Alsehaimi and Lauri Koskela and Patricia Tzortzopoulos",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000148",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "407--413",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

Need for alternative research approaches in construction management : Case of delay studies. / Alsehaimi, Abdullah; Koskela, Lauri; Tzortzopoulos, Patricia.

In: Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 407-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Need for alternative research approaches in construction management

T2 - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

AU - Alsehaimi, Abdullah

AU - Koskela, Lauri

AU - Tzortzopoulos, Patricia

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Over the years, there have been many studies of delay in construction, and this type of study continues to be popular in construction management research. A synthesis and critical evaluation of delay studies in developing countries reveals that poor project management is cited as one of the main causes of delay. However, despite significant consensus, most published studies fall short of providing clear recommendations for the improvement of project management practice. Moreover, the majority of recommendations are general and not devoted to solving the difficulties associated with particular causes of delay. This paper aims to demonstrate that the root cause of this state of affairs is that typical research into delay tends to be descriptive and explanatory, making it inadequate for solving persistent managerial problems in construction. It is contended that many problems in construction could be mitigated through alternative research approaches, i.e., action and constructive research. Such prescriptive research methods can assist in the development and implementation of innovative tools tackling managerial problems of construction, including that of delay. In so doing, those methods will better connect research and practice, and thus strengthen the relevance of academic construction management.

AB - Over the years, there have been many studies of delay in construction, and this type of study continues to be popular in construction management research. A synthesis and critical evaluation of delay studies in developing countries reveals that poor project management is cited as one of the main causes of delay. However, despite significant consensus, most published studies fall short of providing clear recommendations for the improvement of project management practice. Moreover, the majority of recommendations are general and not devoted to solving the difficulties associated with particular causes of delay. This paper aims to demonstrate that the root cause of this state of affairs is that typical research into delay tends to be descriptive and explanatory, making it inadequate for solving persistent managerial problems in construction. It is contended that many problems in construction could be mitigated through alternative research approaches, i.e., action and constructive research. Such prescriptive research methods can assist in the development and implementation of innovative tools tackling managerial problems of construction, including that of delay. In so doing, those methods will better connect research and practice, and thus strengthen the relevance of academic construction management.

KW - Action research

KW - Construction delay

KW - Constructive research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884635749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000148

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000148

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 407

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 4

ER -