Negative pressure wound therapy - Does it affect quality of life?

Karen Ousey, Leanne Cook, Jeanette Milne

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To critically review, appraise and evaluate the available literature with regard to the impact that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has on the quality of life reported by patients. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Publications between 1950 and 2011 were included and all relevant papers were reviewed irrespective of the data collection method if they reported the use of NPWT and patient-reported quality of life data. Abstracts were read for relevance and to determine if the studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Once vetted, full copies of the papers were obtained and two reviewers independently completed a pre-set data collection form that was then sent to the third reviewer to enable central collation and establish the themes reported. Data queries were checked and consensus achieved by discussion. Results: Only five studies met the inclusion criteria, all had methodological flaws, and are of small sample sizes. While there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that NPWT has advantages in reducing healing times as opposed to the use of conventional therapy, there is very little evidence to support the use of NPWT in relation to its impact on patient reported quality of life from either a positive, neutral or negative perspective. Conclusion: It is clear from the review that more studies need to be undertaken in this area of practice before any clear consensus can be achieved. Until such time, practitioners working in the field will have to continue to assess patients on an individual basis by giving information about the therapy with the aim that the patient can make an informed choice about the impact that NPWT may have on their individual quality of life.

LanguageEnglish
Pages18-28
Number of pages11
JournalWounds UK
Volume8
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Quality of Life
MEDLINE
Sample Size
Libraries
Publications
Databases
Therapeutics

Cite this

Ousey, Karen ; Cook, Leanne ; Milne, Jeanette. / Negative pressure wound therapy - Does it affect quality of life?. In: Wounds UK. 2012 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 18-28.
@article{b16312e87aee4120ac5e826d6536980a,
title = "Negative pressure wound therapy - Does it affect quality of life?",
abstract = "Background: To critically review, appraise and evaluate the available literature with regard to the impact that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has on the quality of life reported by patients. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Publications between 1950 and 2011 were included and all relevant papers were reviewed irrespective of the data collection method if they reported the use of NPWT and patient-reported quality of life data. Abstracts were read for relevance and to determine if the studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Once vetted, full copies of the papers were obtained and two reviewers independently completed a pre-set data collection form that was then sent to the third reviewer to enable central collation and establish the themes reported. Data queries were checked and consensus achieved by discussion. Results: Only five studies met the inclusion criteria, all had methodological flaws, and are of small sample sizes. While there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that NPWT has advantages in reducing healing times as opposed to the use of conventional therapy, there is very little evidence to support the use of NPWT in relation to its impact on patient reported quality of life from either a positive, neutral or negative perspective. Conclusion: It is clear from the review that more studies need to be undertaken in this area of practice before any clear consensus can be achieved. Until such time, practitioners working in the field will have to continue to assess patients on an individual basis by giving information about the therapy with the aim that the patient can make an informed choice about the impact that NPWT may have on their individual quality of life.",
keywords = "Negative pressure wound therapy, Quality of life, Systematic review, Topical negative pressure",
author = "Karen Ousey and Leanne Cook and Jeanette Milne",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "18--28",
journal = "Wounds UK",
issn = "1746-6814",
publisher = "Wounds UK",
number = "4",

}

Ousey, K, Cook, L & Milne, J 2012, 'Negative pressure wound therapy - Does it affect quality of life?', Wounds UK, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 18-28.

Negative pressure wound therapy - Does it affect quality of life? / Ousey, Karen; Cook, Leanne; Milne, Jeanette.

In: Wounds UK, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.11.2012, p. 18-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative pressure wound therapy - Does it affect quality of life?

AU - Ousey, Karen

AU - Cook, Leanne

AU - Milne, Jeanette

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Background: To critically review, appraise and evaluate the available literature with regard to the impact that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has on the quality of life reported by patients. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Publications between 1950 and 2011 were included and all relevant papers were reviewed irrespective of the data collection method if they reported the use of NPWT and patient-reported quality of life data. Abstracts were read for relevance and to determine if the studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Once vetted, full copies of the papers were obtained and two reviewers independently completed a pre-set data collection form that was then sent to the third reviewer to enable central collation and establish the themes reported. Data queries were checked and consensus achieved by discussion. Results: Only five studies met the inclusion criteria, all had methodological flaws, and are of small sample sizes. While there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that NPWT has advantages in reducing healing times as opposed to the use of conventional therapy, there is very little evidence to support the use of NPWT in relation to its impact on patient reported quality of life from either a positive, neutral or negative perspective. Conclusion: It is clear from the review that more studies need to be undertaken in this area of practice before any clear consensus can be achieved. Until such time, practitioners working in the field will have to continue to assess patients on an individual basis by giving information about the therapy with the aim that the patient can make an informed choice about the impact that NPWT may have on their individual quality of life.

AB - Background: To critically review, appraise and evaluate the available literature with regard to the impact that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has on the quality of life reported by patients. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Publications between 1950 and 2011 were included and all relevant papers were reviewed irrespective of the data collection method if they reported the use of NPWT and patient-reported quality of life data. Abstracts were read for relevance and to determine if the studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Once vetted, full copies of the papers were obtained and two reviewers independently completed a pre-set data collection form that was then sent to the third reviewer to enable central collation and establish the themes reported. Data queries were checked and consensus achieved by discussion. Results: Only five studies met the inclusion criteria, all had methodological flaws, and are of small sample sizes. While there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that NPWT has advantages in reducing healing times as opposed to the use of conventional therapy, there is very little evidence to support the use of NPWT in relation to its impact on patient reported quality of life from either a positive, neutral or negative perspective. Conclusion: It is clear from the review that more studies need to be undertaken in this area of practice before any clear consensus can be achieved. Until such time, practitioners working in the field will have to continue to assess patients on an individual basis by giving information about the therapy with the aim that the patient can make an informed choice about the impact that NPWT may have on their individual quality of life.

KW - Negative pressure wound therapy

KW - Quality of life

KW - Systematic review

KW - Topical negative pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872401671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.wounds-uk.com/journals/issue/32/article-details/negative-pressure-wound-therapy-does-it-affect-quality-of-life

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

SP - 18

EP - 28

JO - Wounds UK

T2 - Wounds UK

JF - Wounds UK

SN - 1746-6814

IS - 4

ER -