Noise and Electromagnetic Comparison of a Three-Phase 12/8 and a 12/10 Switched Reluctance Machine

Earl Fairall, Nigel Schofield, Ali Emadi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this work, non-segmented three-phase 12/10 magnetic topology is compared with a three-phase 12/8 design. While higher pole count often implies higher losses, the 12/10 functions entirely on short flux paths. 12/10 core loss implications are; therefore, not immediately clear when compared with 12/8. Pole count also impacts inductance and saliency, parameters which govern all aspects of switched reluctance machine performance. To better understand the non-segmented three-phase 12/10, a comparison is presented with geometrically and magnetically similar three-phase 12/8 and 12/10 switched reluctance machines. The influence of pole count on losses, torque quality, noise and vibration will be compared under specific defined conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, ITEC 2016
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781509004034
ISBN (Print)9781509004041
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo - Dearborn, United States
Duration: 27 Jun 201629 Jun 2016

Conference

Conference2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo
Abbreviated titleITEC 2016
CountryUnited States
CityDearborn
Period27/06/1629/06/16

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Noise and Electromagnetic Comparison of a Three-Phase 12/8 and a 12/10 Switched Reluctance Machine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this