Not Single Spies But in Battalions: A Critical, Sociological Engagement with the Idea of So-Called ‘Troubled Families’

Robert MacDonald, Tracy Shildrick, Andy Furlong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent political and popular discourses in the UK have drawn upon a range of different concepts and powerful and easily recalled sound bites to describe groups who are disadvantaged and who are portrayed as undeserving. The labelling of disadvantaged groups in negative terms and in order to support punitive policies has a long history and not just in the UK. From the racialized ‘underclass’ discourses popular in the US to the recent discourse around ‘Troubled Families’ in the UK, there is a long tradition of labelling disadvantaged groups in such ways that they are alleged to be poor because of their dysfunctional cultures, anti-social behaviours and destructive family life-styles. Drawing on interviews collected with different generations of deeply disadvantaged families we offer one of the first, empirical, sociological accounts of the problems and troubles that some families can face – over decades and over generations. We use this empirical case study by way of illustrating how these negative discourses successfully pave the way for punitive policy interventions and how they also have implications for how disadvantaged groups are treated and for personal well-being.

LanguageEnglish
Pages821-836
Number of pages16
JournalSociological Review
Volume64
Issue number4
Early online date17 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discourse
Group
life style
social behavior
well-being
history
interview

Cite this

@article{710c497e7f1e4b0f98a84840c1fcde37,
title = "Not Single Spies But in Battalions: A Critical, Sociological Engagement with the Idea of So-Called ‘Troubled Families’",
abstract = "Recent political and popular discourses in the UK have drawn upon a range of different concepts and powerful and easily recalled sound bites to describe groups who are disadvantaged and who are portrayed as undeserving. The labelling of disadvantaged groups in negative terms and in order to support punitive policies has a long history and not just in the UK. From the racialized ‘underclass’ discourses popular in the US to the recent discourse around ‘Troubled Families’ in the UK, there is a long tradition of labelling disadvantaged groups in such ways that they are alleged to be poor because of their dysfunctional cultures, anti-social behaviours and destructive family life-styles. Drawing on interviews collected with different generations of deeply disadvantaged families we offer one of the first, empirical, sociological accounts of the problems and troubles that some families can face – over decades and over generations. We use this empirical case study by way of illustrating how these negative discourses successfully pave the way for punitive policy interventions and how they also have implications for how disadvantaged groups are treated and for personal well-being.",
keywords = "poverty, troubled families, undeserving poor",
author = "Robert MacDonald and Tracy Shildrick and Andy Furlong",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-954X.12425",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "821--836",
journal = "Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Not Single Spies But in Battalions : A Critical, Sociological Engagement with the Idea of So-Called ‘Troubled Families’. / MacDonald, Robert; Shildrick, Tracy; Furlong, Andy.

In: Sociological Review, Vol. 64, No. 4, 01.11.2016, p. 821-836.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not Single Spies But in Battalions

T2 - Sociological Review

AU - MacDonald, Robert

AU - Shildrick, Tracy

AU - Furlong, Andy

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Recent political and popular discourses in the UK have drawn upon a range of different concepts and powerful and easily recalled sound bites to describe groups who are disadvantaged and who are portrayed as undeserving. The labelling of disadvantaged groups in negative terms and in order to support punitive policies has a long history and not just in the UK. From the racialized ‘underclass’ discourses popular in the US to the recent discourse around ‘Troubled Families’ in the UK, there is a long tradition of labelling disadvantaged groups in such ways that they are alleged to be poor because of their dysfunctional cultures, anti-social behaviours and destructive family life-styles. Drawing on interviews collected with different generations of deeply disadvantaged families we offer one of the first, empirical, sociological accounts of the problems and troubles that some families can face – over decades and over generations. We use this empirical case study by way of illustrating how these negative discourses successfully pave the way for punitive policy interventions and how they also have implications for how disadvantaged groups are treated and for personal well-being.

AB - Recent political and popular discourses in the UK have drawn upon a range of different concepts and powerful and easily recalled sound bites to describe groups who are disadvantaged and who are portrayed as undeserving. The labelling of disadvantaged groups in negative terms and in order to support punitive policies has a long history and not just in the UK. From the racialized ‘underclass’ discourses popular in the US to the recent discourse around ‘Troubled Families’ in the UK, there is a long tradition of labelling disadvantaged groups in such ways that they are alleged to be poor because of their dysfunctional cultures, anti-social behaviours and destructive family life-styles. Drawing on interviews collected with different generations of deeply disadvantaged families we offer one of the first, empirical, sociological accounts of the problems and troubles that some families can face – over decades and over generations. We use this empirical case study by way of illustrating how these negative discourses successfully pave the way for punitive policy interventions and how they also have implications for how disadvantaged groups are treated and for personal well-being.

KW - poverty

KW - troubled families

KW - undeserving poor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991467093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-954X.12425

DO - 10.1111/1467-954X.12425

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 821

EP - 836

JO - Sociological Review

JF - Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 4

ER -