1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Following Massimo Banzi's comment that the Arduino development board might be seen as a means of ‘scratching your own itch’, this paper explores the concept of affect in relation to physical computing, and investigates the ways in which cybernetic and networked objects could be said to enact a series of process-philosophical and object-oriented tensions. In so doing it addresses the cultural saturation of Arduino and its employment in an array of institutional, artistic and activist contexts, and brings this to bear on the conflict between the process philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the more directly object-oriented perspectives of Graham Harman, Ian Bogost and Bruno Latour. Framing the enquiry around the at once ethico-aesthetic and speculative realist questions of what it is to ‘scratch' and what it is to ‘itch', the paper examines micro- and macro-political agency in the context of physical computing—contrasting process philosophy's pronounced notion of affective, connective, creative differentiation with the black-boxed, withdrawn objects of object-oriented philosophy, and its quasi-causal mode of aesthetic interaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-162
Number of pages20
JournalDigital Creativity
Volume27
Issue number2
Early online date17 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Cybernetics
Macros

Cite this

Roberts, Spencer. / On scratching your own itch. In: Digital Creativity. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 143-162.
@article{697d411725ff48ca907285d9f790815e,
title = "On scratching your own itch",
abstract = "Following Massimo Banzi's comment that the Arduino development board might be seen as a means of ‘scratching your own itch’, this paper explores the concept of affect in relation to physical computing, and investigates the ways in which cybernetic and networked objects could be said to enact a series of process-philosophical and object-oriented tensions. In so doing it addresses the cultural saturation of Arduino and its employment in an array of institutional, artistic and activist contexts, and brings this to bear on the conflict between the process philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the more directly object-oriented perspectives of Graham Harman, Ian Bogost and Bruno Latour. Framing the enquiry around the at once ethico-aesthetic and speculative realist questions of what it is to ‘scratch' and what it is to ‘itch', the paper examines micro- and macro-political agency in the context of physical computing—contrasting process philosophy's pronounced notion of affective, connective, creative differentiation with the black-boxed, withdrawn objects of object-oriented philosophy, and its quasi-causal mode of aesthetic interaction.",
keywords = "Arduino, process philosophy, object-oriented ontology, Gilles Deleuze, Graham Harman",
author = "Spencer Roberts",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/14626268.2016.1143016",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "143--162",
journal = "Digital Creativity",
issn = "1462-6268",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

On scratching your own itch. / Roberts, Spencer.

In: Digital Creativity, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2016, p. 143-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On scratching your own itch

AU - Roberts, Spencer

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Following Massimo Banzi's comment that the Arduino development board might be seen as a means of ‘scratching your own itch’, this paper explores the concept of affect in relation to physical computing, and investigates the ways in which cybernetic and networked objects could be said to enact a series of process-philosophical and object-oriented tensions. In so doing it addresses the cultural saturation of Arduino and its employment in an array of institutional, artistic and activist contexts, and brings this to bear on the conflict between the process philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the more directly object-oriented perspectives of Graham Harman, Ian Bogost and Bruno Latour. Framing the enquiry around the at once ethico-aesthetic and speculative realist questions of what it is to ‘scratch' and what it is to ‘itch', the paper examines micro- and macro-political agency in the context of physical computing—contrasting process philosophy's pronounced notion of affective, connective, creative differentiation with the black-boxed, withdrawn objects of object-oriented philosophy, and its quasi-causal mode of aesthetic interaction.

AB - Following Massimo Banzi's comment that the Arduino development board might be seen as a means of ‘scratching your own itch’, this paper explores the concept of affect in relation to physical computing, and investigates the ways in which cybernetic and networked objects could be said to enact a series of process-philosophical and object-oriented tensions. In so doing it addresses the cultural saturation of Arduino and its employment in an array of institutional, artistic and activist contexts, and brings this to bear on the conflict between the process philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the more directly object-oriented perspectives of Graham Harman, Ian Bogost and Bruno Latour. Framing the enquiry around the at once ethico-aesthetic and speculative realist questions of what it is to ‘scratch' and what it is to ‘itch', the paper examines micro- and macro-political agency in the context of physical computing—contrasting process philosophy's pronounced notion of affective, connective, creative differentiation with the black-boxed, withdrawn objects of object-oriented philosophy, and its quasi-causal mode of aesthetic interaction.

KW - Arduino

KW - process philosophy

KW - object-oriented ontology

KW - Gilles Deleuze

KW - Graham Harman

U2 - 10.1080/14626268.2016.1143016

DO - 10.1080/14626268.2016.1143016

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 143

EP - 162

JO - Digital Creativity

JF - Digital Creativity

SN - 1462-6268

IS - 2

ER -