On the nature of "laughables": Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article I explore the relationship between laugh responses and the turns which they orient to. I consider whether it is possible to identify properties of the prior turns that the recipient may be orienting to in laughing. Thus, I begin by briefly exploring the relationship between laughter and humour in interaction. But I point to some of the difficulties in identifying what it is that makes some discourse humorous, and I argue that laughter is not simply a reaction to the perception of humour. Laughter should be considered as an action in its own right, the occurrence of which may have nothing to do with the presence of humour. Consequently, I consider the notion of the "laughable" and whilst I agree that "(v)irtually any utterance or action could draw laughter, under the right (or wrong) circumstances" (Glenn 2003: 49), I argue it is often possible to identify recurrent properties of turns treated as laughables. These properties concern the design, action and the sequential position of the turns. Thus, it seems that speakers draw from a range of resources in constructing laughables. I illustrate this by exploring a collection of instances of figurative phrases followed by laugh responses from telephone calls. I argue that in responding with laughter, recipients may orient to a cluster of properties in the prior turn. However, because laughter is an action with its own sequential implications, rather than simply a response to a prior turn, whether a recipient orients to a prior candidate laughable by laughing will depend on the nature of his or her contribution to the action sequence.

LanguageEnglish
Pages393-410
Number of pages18
JournalPragmatics
Volume21
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

humor
recipient
Laughter
Figurative
telephone
candidacy
Orient
Recipient
discourse
interaction
resources

Cite this

@article{a365ce5b91024bee87d2d05c64c037c0,
title = "On the nature of {"}laughables{"}: Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases",
abstract = "In this article I explore the relationship between laugh responses and the turns which they orient to. I consider whether it is possible to identify properties of the prior turns that the recipient may be orienting to in laughing. Thus, I begin by briefly exploring the relationship between laughter and humour in interaction. But I point to some of the difficulties in identifying what it is that makes some discourse humorous, and I argue that laughter is not simply a reaction to the perception of humour. Laughter should be considered as an action in its own right, the occurrence of which may have nothing to do with the presence of humour. Consequently, I consider the notion of the {"}laughable{"} and whilst I agree that {"}(v)irtually any utterance or action could draw laughter, under the right (or wrong) circumstances{"} (Glenn 2003: 49), I argue it is often possible to identify recurrent properties of turns treated as laughables. These properties concern the design, action and the sequential position of the turns. Thus, it seems that speakers draw from a range of resources in constructing laughables. I illustrate this by exploring a collection of instances of figurative phrases followed by laugh responses from telephone calls. I argue that in responding with laughter, recipients may orient to a cluster of properties in the prior turn. However, because laughter is an action with its own sequential implications, rather than simply a response to a prior turn, whether a recipient orients to a prior candidate laughable by laughing will depend on the nature of his or her contribution to the action sequence.",
keywords = "Conversation analysis, Figurative expression, Laughable, Laughter",
author = "Elizabeth Holt",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "393--410",
journal = "Pragmatics",
issn = "1018-2101",
publisher = "International Pragmatics Association",
number = "3",

}

On the nature of "laughables" : Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases. / Holt, Elizabeth.

In: Pragmatics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 393-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the nature of "laughables"

T2 - Pragmatics

AU - Holt, Elizabeth

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - In this article I explore the relationship between laugh responses and the turns which they orient to. I consider whether it is possible to identify properties of the prior turns that the recipient may be orienting to in laughing. Thus, I begin by briefly exploring the relationship between laughter and humour in interaction. But I point to some of the difficulties in identifying what it is that makes some discourse humorous, and I argue that laughter is not simply a reaction to the perception of humour. Laughter should be considered as an action in its own right, the occurrence of which may have nothing to do with the presence of humour. Consequently, I consider the notion of the "laughable" and whilst I agree that "(v)irtually any utterance or action could draw laughter, under the right (or wrong) circumstances" (Glenn 2003: 49), I argue it is often possible to identify recurrent properties of turns treated as laughables. These properties concern the design, action and the sequential position of the turns. Thus, it seems that speakers draw from a range of resources in constructing laughables. I illustrate this by exploring a collection of instances of figurative phrases followed by laugh responses from telephone calls. I argue that in responding with laughter, recipients may orient to a cluster of properties in the prior turn. However, because laughter is an action with its own sequential implications, rather than simply a response to a prior turn, whether a recipient orients to a prior candidate laughable by laughing will depend on the nature of his or her contribution to the action sequence.

AB - In this article I explore the relationship between laugh responses and the turns which they orient to. I consider whether it is possible to identify properties of the prior turns that the recipient may be orienting to in laughing. Thus, I begin by briefly exploring the relationship between laughter and humour in interaction. But I point to some of the difficulties in identifying what it is that makes some discourse humorous, and I argue that laughter is not simply a reaction to the perception of humour. Laughter should be considered as an action in its own right, the occurrence of which may have nothing to do with the presence of humour. Consequently, I consider the notion of the "laughable" and whilst I agree that "(v)irtually any utterance or action could draw laughter, under the right (or wrong) circumstances" (Glenn 2003: 49), I argue it is often possible to identify recurrent properties of turns treated as laughables. These properties concern the design, action and the sequential position of the turns. Thus, it seems that speakers draw from a range of resources in constructing laughables. I illustrate this by exploring a collection of instances of figurative phrases followed by laugh responses from telephone calls. I argue that in responding with laughter, recipients may orient to a cluster of properties in the prior turn. However, because laughter is an action with its own sequential implications, rather than simply a response to a prior turn, whether a recipient orients to a prior candidate laughable by laughing will depend on the nature of his or her contribution to the action sequence.

KW - Conversation analysis

KW - Figurative expression

KW - Laughable

KW - Laughter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857887186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 393

EP - 410

JO - Pragmatics

JF - Pragmatics

SN - 1018-2101

IS - 3

ER -