On the Situation in Palestine and the War Crime of Transfer of Civilians into Occupied Territory

Michael Kearney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the war crime at Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, 'the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies', by addressing the doctrinal elements of the provision in light of the impact which the practice of transfer of Israeli civilians into occupied territory has had on the application of the rule of international law to the broader situation in Palestine. The provision is distinct among war crimes within the Court's jurisdiction as it refers to the activity of a state – the occupying power – in addition to that of the individual perpetrator. This feature reflects the structural issues that the provision was designed to address, and emphasizes that its purpose is not so much to confront direct physical violence, but rather to prevent colonial practices. Despite the political significance of the underlying conduct there has been comparatively little analysis of the war crime itself. Following an overview of how Israel's transfer of civilians into occupied territory challenges international law's distinction between civilian and combatant and has given rise to the charge of apartheid, the paper considers the drafting history of Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, reflecting on the provision's unusual construction, before reviewing Israel's state responsibility for unlawful transfer, and considering the temporal jurisdiction of the ICC and the nature of continuing and continuous crimes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-34
Number of pages34
JournalCriminal Law Forum
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date18 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

occupied territory
war crime
Palestine
occupying power
international law
statute
jurisdiction
Israel
civilian population
apartheid
Israeli
offense
violence
responsibility
history

Cite this

@article{c2dba7bf682e4f8b832272259d492b32,
title = "On the Situation in Palestine and the War Crime of Transfer of Civilians into Occupied Territory",
abstract = "This paper considers the war crime at Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, 'the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies', by addressing the doctrinal elements of the provision in light of the impact which the practice of transfer of Israeli civilians into occupied territory has had on the application of the rule of international law to the broader situation in Palestine. The provision is distinct among war crimes within the Court's jurisdiction as it refers to the activity of a state – the occupying power – in addition to that of the individual perpetrator. This feature reflects the structural issues that the provision was designed to address, and emphasizes that its purpose is not so much to confront direct physical violence, but rather to prevent colonial practices. Despite the political significance of the underlying conduct there has been comparatively little analysis of the war crime itself. Following an overview of how Israel's transfer of civilians into occupied territory challenges international law's distinction between civilian and combatant and has given rise to the charge of apartheid, the paper considers the drafting history of Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, reflecting on the provision's unusual construction, before reviewing Israel's state responsibility for unlawful transfer, and considering the temporal jurisdiction of the ICC and the nature of continuing and continuous crimes.",
keywords = "settlement transfer, colonialism, territorial jurisdiction, temporal, rome statute, war crime",
author = "Michael Kearney",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10609-016-9300-9",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1--34",
journal = "Criminal Law Forum",
issn = "1046-8374",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

On the Situation in Palestine and the War Crime of Transfer of Civilians into Occupied Territory. / Kearney, Michael.

In: Criminal Law Forum, Vol. 28, No. 1, 03.2017, p. 1-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Situation in Palestine and the War Crime of Transfer of Civilians into Occupied Territory

AU - Kearney, Michael

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - This paper considers the war crime at Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, 'the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies', by addressing the doctrinal elements of the provision in light of the impact which the practice of transfer of Israeli civilians into occupied territory has had on the application of the rule of international law to the broader situation in Palestine. The provision is distinct among war crimes within the Court's jurisdiction as it refers to the activity of a state – the occupying power – in addition to that of the individual perpetrator. This feature reflects the structural issues that the provision was designed to address, and emphasizes that its purpose is not so much to confront direct physical violence, but rather to prevent colonial practices. Despite the political significance of the underlying conduct there has been comparatively little analysis of the war crime itself. Following an overview of how Israel's transfer of civilians into occupied territory challenges international law's distinction between civilian and combatant and has given rise to the charge of apartheid, the paper considers the drafting history of Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, reflecting on the provision's unusual construction, before reviewing Israel's state responsibility for unlawful transfer, and considering the temporal jurisdiction of the ICC and the nature of continuing and continuous crimes.

AB - This paper considers the war crime at Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, 'the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies', by addressing the doctrinal elements of the provision in light of the impact which the practice of transfer of Israeli civilians into occupied territory has had on the application of the rule of international law to the broader situation in Palestine. The provision is distinct among war crimes within the Court's jurisdiction as it refers to the activity of a state – the occupying power – in addition to that of the individual perpetrator. This feature reflects the structural issues that the provision was designed to address, and emphasizes that its purpose is not so much to confront direct physical violence, but rather to prevent colonial practices. Despite the political significance of the underlying conduct there has been comparatively little analysis of the war crime itself. Following an overview of how Israel's transfer of civilians into occupied territory challenges international law's distinction between civilian and combatant and has given rise to the charge of apartheid, the paper considers the drafting history of Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, reflecting on the provision's unusual construction, before reviewing Israel's state responsibility for unlawful transfer, and considering the temporal jurisdiction of the ICC and the nature of continuing and continuous crimes.

KW - settlement transfer

KW - colonialism

KW - territorial jurisdiction

KW - temporal

KW - rome statute

KW - war crime

U2 - 10.1007/s10609-016-9300-9

DO - 10.1007/s10609-016-9300-9

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1

EP - 34

JO - Criminal Law Forum

JF - Criminal Law Forum

SN - 1046-8374

IS - 1

ER -