On whom does the burden of crime fall now? Changes over time in counts and concentration

Dainis Ignatans, Ken Pease

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent publication (Ignatans and Pease, 2015) sought to examine the changed distribution of crime across households in England and Wales over a period encompassing that of the crime drop common to Western countries (1982–2012). It was found that while crime against the most victimised households declined most in absolute terms, the proportion of all crime accounted for by those most victimised increased somewhat. The characteristics associated with highly victimised households were found to be consistent across survey sweeps. The pattern suggested the continued relevance to crime reduction generally of prioritising repeat crimes against the same target. The present paper analyses the changed distribution of crime by offence type. Data were extracted from a total of almost 600,000 respondents from all sweeps of the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) 1982–2012 to determine which types of victimisation became more or less concentrated across households during the overall crime drop. Methodological issues underlying the patterns observed are discussed. Cross-national and crime type extension of work of the kind undertaken here are advocated as both intrinsically important and likely to clarify the dynamics of the crime drop.

LanguageEnglish
Pages55-63
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Review of Victimology
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

offense
time
victimization

Cite this

@article{a3d61a13c49348de8cb65601566c9aa8,
title = "On whom does the burden of crime fall now? Changes over time in counts and concentration",
abstract = "A recent publication (Ignatans and Pease, 2015) sought to examine the changed distribution of crime across households in England and Wales over a period encompassing that of the crime drop common to Western countries (1982–2012). It was found that while crime against the most victimised households declined most in absolute terms, the proportion of all crime accounted for by those most victimised increased somewhat. The characteristics associated with highly victimised households were found to be consistent across survey sweeps. The pattern suggested the continued relevance to crime reduction generally of prioritising repeat crimes against the same target. The present paper analyses the changed distribution of crime by offence type. Data were extracted from a total of almost 600,000 respondents from all sweeps of the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) 1982–2012 to determine which types of victimisation became more or less concentrated across households during the overall crime drop. Methodological issues underlying the patterns observed are discussed. Cross-national and crime type extension of work of the kind undertaken here are advocated as both intrinsically important and likely to clarify the dynamics of the crime drop.",
keywords = "crime concentration, crime drop, quantitative criminology, Victimisation",
author = "Dainis Ignatans and Ken Pease",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269758015610854",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "55--63",
journal = "International Review of Victimology",
issn = "0269-7580",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

On whom does the burden of crime fall now? Changes over time in counts and concentration. / Ignatans, Dainis; Pease, Ken.

In: International Review of Victimology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 55-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On whom does the burden of crime fall now? Changes over time in counts and concentration

AU - Ignatans, Dainis

AU - Pease, Ken

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - A recent publication (Ignatans and Pease, 2015) sought to examine the changed distribution of crime across households in England and Wales over a period encompassing that of the crime drop common to Western countries (1982–2012). It was found that while crime against the most victimised households declined most in absolute terms, the proportion of all crime accounted for by those most victimised increased somewhat. The characteristics associated with highly victimised households were found to be consistent across survey sweeps. The pattern suggested the continued relevance to crime reduction generally of prioritising repeat crimes against the same target. The present paper analyses the changed distribution of crime by offence type. Data were extracted from a total of almost 600,000 respondents from all sweeps of the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) 1982–2012 to determine which types of victimisation became more or less concentrated across households during the overall crime drop. Methodological issues underlying the patterns observed are discussed. Cross-national and crime type extension of work of the kind undertaken here are advocated as both intrinsically important and likely to clarify the dynamics of the crime drop.

AB - A recent publication (Ignatans and Pease, 2015) sought to examine the changed distribution of crime across households in England and Wales over a period encompassing that of the crime drop common to Western countries (1982–2012). It was found that while crime against the most victimised households declined most in absolute terms, the proportion of all crime accounted for by those most victimised increased somewhat. The characteristics associated with highly victimised households were found to be consistent across survey sweeps. The pattern suggested the continued relevance to crime reduction generally of prioritising repeat crimes against the same target. The present paper analyses the changed distribution of crime by offence type. Data were extracted from a total of almost 600,000 respondents from all sweeps of the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) 1982–2012 to determine which types of victimisation became more or less concentrated across households during the overall crime drop. Methodological issues underlying the patterns observed are discussed. Cross-national and crime type extension of work of the kind undertaken here are advocated as both intrinsically important and likely to clarify the dynamics of the crime drop.

KW - crime concentration

KW - crime drop

KW - quantitative criminology

KW - Victimisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950123914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269758015610854

DO - 10.1177/0269758015610854

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 55

EP - 63

JO - International Review of Victimology

T2 - International Review of Victimology

JF - International Review of Victimology

SN - 0269-7580

IS - 1

ER -