Ophthalmic statistics note 10

Data transformations

Catey Bunce, John Stephenson, Caroline J. Doré, Nick Freemantle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many statistical analyses in ophthalmic and other clinical fields are concerned with describing relationships between one or more ‘predictors’ (explanatory or independent variables) and usually one outcome measure (response or dependent variable). Our earlier statistical notes make reference to the fact that statistical techniques often make assumptions about data.1 ,2 Assumptions may relate to the outcome variable, to the predictor variable or indeed both; common assumptions are that data follow normal (Gaussian) distributions and that observations are independent. It is, of course, entirely possible to ignore such assumptions, but doing so is not good statistical practice and in medicine; poor statistical practice can impact negatively upon patients and the public.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1591-1593
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume100
Issue number12
Early online date22 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Normal Distribution
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

Bunce, Catey ; Stephenson, John ; Doré, Caroline J. ; Freemantle, Nick. / Ophthalmic statistics note 10 : Data transformations. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016 ; Vol. 100, No. 12. pp. 1591-1593.
@article{3af018a0b436489ea6a2b619fab04143,
title = "Ophthalmic statistics note 10: Data transformations",
abstract = "Many statistical analyses in ophthalmic and other clinical fields are concerned with describing relationships between one or more ‘predictors’ (explanatory or independent variables) and usually one outcome measure (response or dependent variable). Our earlier statistical notes make reference to the fact that statistical techniques often make assumptions about data.1 ,2 Assumptions may relate to the outcome variable, to the predictor variable or indeed both; common assumptions are that data follow normal (Gaussian) distributions and that observations are independent. It is, of course, entirely possible to ignore such assumptions, but doing so is not good statistical practice and in medicine; poor statistical practice can impact negatively upon patients and the public.",
keywords = "Medical Education",
author = "Catey Bunce and John Stephenson and Dor{\'e}, {Caroline J.} and Nick Freemantle",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308824",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "1591--1593",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

Ophthalmic statistics note 10 : Data transformations. / Bunce, Catey; Stephenson, John; Doré, Caroline J.; Freemantle, Nick.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 100, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 1591-1593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ophthalmic statistics note 10

T2 - Data transformations

AU - Bunce, Catey

AU - Stephenson, John

AU - Doré, Caroline J.

AU - Freemantle, Nick

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Many statistical analyses in ophthalmic and other clinical fields are concerned with describing relationships between one or more ‘predictors’ (explanatory or independent variables) and usually one outcome measure (response or dependent variable). Our earlier statistical notes make reference to the fact that statistical techniques often make assumptions about data.1 ,2 Assumptions may relate to the outcome variable, to the predictor variable or indeed both; common assumptions are that data follow normal (Gaussian) distributions and that observations are independent. It is, of course, entirely possible to ignore such assumptions, but doing so is not good statistical practice and in medicine; poor statistical practice can impact negatively upon patients and the public.

AB - Many statistical analyses in ophthalmic and other clinical fields are concerned with describing relationships between one or more ‘predictors’ (explanatory or independent variables) and usually one outcome measure (response or dependent variable). Our earlier statistical notes make reference to the fact that statistical techniques often make assumptions about data.1 ,2 Assumptions may relate to the outcome variable, to the predictor variable or indeed both; common assumptions are that data follow normal (Gaussian) distributions and that observations are independent. It is, of course, entirely possible to ignore such assumptions, but doing so is not good statistical practice and in medicine; poor statistical practice can impact negatively upon patients and the public.

KW - Medical Education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978680815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308824

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308824

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 1591

EP - 1593

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 12

ER -