Organising and Managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM)

Eleni Papadonikolaki, Clarine van Oel, Michail Kagioglou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The construction industry is currently undergoing digital transformation due to emerging technologies. Hence new forms of organisation are needed. Collaborating with Building Information Modelling (BIM) is complex and challenges the management of projects. The ubiquitous digital information sharing among multi-disciplinary actors in BIM-based projects, activates dense interorganisational processes. This study offers insights into collaboration with BIM, through the theoretical lens of boundaries. By analysing two projects of BIM-based collaboration in the Netherlands, the interplay between structure and agency of collaboration was discussed. The various artefacts of BIM, as boundary objects were interpreted in multiple ways by different communities of
practice and this resulted in poor communication and consequently poor collaboration. The findings challenge the prevalent view of BIM as a software artefact and showed that this view only partially supports collaboration. Additionally, a structurational view (enabled by communication, conflict
management, negotiation, and teamwork) as opposed to a structural view of collaboration (e.g. BIM as a software) can fully support the implementation of digital innovations. Finally, the paper revealed a ‘tactical gap’ in the implementation of digital between strategic and operational decision-making
needs fine-tuning to ensure better collaboration in projects where digital innovations are adopted. The study concludes with propositions for supporting organisation of teams through integration of activities and the management of BIM-based collaboration in projects beyond merely structural and
technological approaches, which dominate the field but from a structurational view instead.
LanguageEnglish
Pages378-394
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Project Management
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date13 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Innovation
Communication
Construction industry
Lenses
Tuning
Information modeling
Organizing

Cite this

@article{721674216dcc407d9d93ddb00b827961,
title = "Organising and Managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM)",
abstract = "The construction industry is currently undergoing digital transformation due to emerging technologies. Hence new forms of organisation are needed. Collaborating with Building Information Modelling (BIM) is complex and challenges the management of projects. The ubiquitous digital information sharing among multi-disciplinary actors in BIM-based projects, activates dense interorganisational processes. This study offers insights into collaboration with BIM, through the theoretical lens of boundaries. By analysing two projects of BIM-based collaboration in the Netherlands, the interplay between structure and agency of collaboration was discussed. The various artefacts of BIM, as boundary objects were interpreted in multiple ways by different communities ofpractice and this resulted in poor communication and consequently poor collaboration. The findings challenge the prevalent view of BIM as a software artefact and showed that this view only partially supports collaboration. Additionally, a structurational view (enabled by communication, conflictmanagement, negotiation, and teamwork) as opposed to a structural view of collaboration (e.g. BIM as a software) can fully support the implementation of digital innovations. Finally, the paper revealed a ‘tactical gap’ in the implementation of digital between strategic and operational decision-makingneeds fine-tuning to ensure better collaboration in projects where digital innovations are adopted. The study concludes with propositions for supporting organisation of teams through integration of activities and the management of BIM-based collaboration in projects beyond merely structural andtechnological approaches, which dominate the field but from a structurational view instead.",
keywords = "Boundary theory, Building Information Modelling (BIM), Collaboration, Digital, Structuration",
author = "Eleni Papadonikolaki and {van Oel}, Clarine and Michail Kagioglou",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.010",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "378--394",
journal = "International Journal of Project Management",
issn = "0263-7863",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

Organising and Managing boundaries : A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM). / Papadonikolaki, Eleni; van Oel, Clarine; Kagioglou, Michail.

In: International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.04.2019, p. 378-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organising and Managing boundaries

T2 - International Journal of Project Management

AU - Papadonikolaki, Eleni

AU - van Oel, Clarine

AU - Kagioglou, Michail

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - The construction industry is currently undergoing digital transformation due to emerging technologies. Hence new forms of organisation are needed. Collaborating with Building Information Modelling (BIM) is complex and challenges the management of projects. The ubiquitous digital information sharing among multi-disciplinary actors in BIM-based projects, activates dense interorganisational processes. This study offers insights into collaboration with BIM, through the theoretical lens of boundaries. By analysing two projects of BIM-based collaboration in the Netherlands, the interplay between structure and agency of collaboration was discussed. The various artefacts of BIM, as boundary objects were interpreted in multiple ways by different communities ofpractice and this resulted in poor communication and consequently poor collaboration. The findings challenge the prevalent view of BIM as a software artefact and showed that this view only partially supports collaboration. Additionally, a structurational view (enabled by communication, conflictmanagement, negotiation, and teamwork) as opposed to a structural view of collaboration (e.g. BIM as a software) can fully support the implementation of digital innovations. Finally, the paper revealed a ‘tactical gap’ in the implementation of digital between strategic and operational decision-makingneeds fine-tuning to ensure better collaboration in projects where digital innovations are adopted. The study concludes with propositions for supporting organisation of teams through integration of activities and the management of BIM-based collaboration in projects beyond merely structural andtechnological approaches, which dominate the field but from a structurational view instead.

AB - The construction industry is currently undergoing digital transformation due to emerging technologies. Hence new forms of organisation are needed. Collaborating with Building Information Modelling (BIM) is complex and challenges the management of projects. The ubiquitous digital information sharing among multi-disciplinary actors in BIM-based projects, activates dense interorganisational processes. This study offers insights into collaboration with BIM, through the theoretical lens of boundaries. By analysing two projects of BIM-based collaboration in the Netherlands, the interplay between structure and agency of collaboration was discussed. The various artefacts of BIM, as boundary objects were interpreted in multiple ways by different communities ofpractice and this resulted in poor communication and consequently poor collaboration. The findings challenge the prevalent view of BIM as a software artefact and showed that this view only partially supports collaboration. Additionally, a structurational view (enabled by communication, conflictmanagement, negotiation, and teamwork) as opposed to a structural view of collaboration (e.g. BIM as a software) can fully support the implementation of digital innovations. Finally, the paper revealed a ‘tactical gap’ in the implementation of digital between strategic and operational decision-makingneeds fine-tuning to ensure better collaboration in projects where digital innovations are adopted. The study concludes with propositions for supporting organisation of teams through integration of activities and the management of BIM-based collaboration in projects beyond merely structural andtechnological approaches, which dominate the field but from a structurational view instead.

KW - Boundary theory

KW - Building Information Modelling (BIM)

KW - Collaboration

KW - Digital

KW - Structuration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061406205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.010

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 378

EP - 394

JO - International Journal of Project Management

JF - International Journal of Project Management

SN - 0263-7863

IS - 3

ER -