Out of sight, out of mind

Ethnic inequalities in child protection and out-of-home care intervention rates

Paul Bywaters, Josephine Kwhali, Geraldine Brady, Tim Sparks, Elizabeth Bos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the interlocking roles of ethnicity and deprivation in producing inequities in the proportion of children who are subject to state child protection interventions. In contrast to the USA, ethnic inequities have had little attention in research or policy in the UK and across Europe, and administrative data are limited and methodologically weak. A study of over 10 per cent of all children on child protection plans or who were looked after in out-of-home care in England in March 2012 is reported. Children from ethnic minority categories were much more likely than ‘White’ children to be living in disadvantaged areas and this has to be taken into account when examining intervention rates. Controlling for deprivation and examining small subgroups of the broad ethnic categories radically alters the simple understanding that ‘Black’ children are overrepresented compared to White amongst children in out-of-home care, while ‘Asian’ children are under-represented. While this study could not explain these patterns, it reinforces the importance of both socio-economic circumstances and ethnicity for understanding inequities in intervention rates. The evidence underlines the powerful moral and economic case for action to reduce inequities in powerful state interventions in family life, not only in England, but internationally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1884-1902
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number7
Early online date8 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ethnic inequality
child protection
Home Care Services
home care
deprivation
ethnicity
England
Economics
national minority
economics
Vulnerable Populations

Cite this

Bywaters, Paul ; Kwhali, Josephine ; Brady, Geraldine ; Sparks, Tim ; Bos, Elizabeth. / Out of sight, out of mind : Ethnic inequalities in child protection and out-of-home care intervention rates. In: British Journal of Social Work. 2017 ; Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 1884-1902.
@article{3b6f3b69fd1f4c6c92ec21cbdfd3a4dc,
title = "Out of sight, out of mind: Ethnic inequalities in child protection and out-of-home care intervention rates",
abstract = "This paper examines the interlocking roles of ethnicity and deprivation in producing inequities in the proportion of children who are subject to state child protection interventions. In contrast to the USA, ethnic inequities have had little attention in research or policy in the UK and across Europe, and administrative data are limited and methodologically weak. A study of over 10 per cent of all children on child protection plans or who were looked after in out-of-home care in England in March 2012 is reported. Children from ethnic minority categories were much more likely than ‘White’ children to be living in disadvantaged areas and this has to be taken into account when examining intervention rates. Controlling for deprivation and examining small subgroups of the broad ethnic categories radically alters the simple understanding that ‘Black’ children are overrepresented compared to White amongst children in out-of-home care, while ‘Asian’ children are under-represented. While this study could not explain these patterns, it reinforces the importance of both socio-economic circumstances and ethnicity for understanding inequities in intervention rates. The evidence underlines the powerful moral and economic case for action to reduce inequities in powerful state interventions in family life, not only in England, but internationally.",
keywords = "Child protection, Deprivation, Ethnicity, Inequalities, Out-of-home care",
author = "Paul Bywaters and Josephine Kwhali and Geraldine Brady and Tim Sparks and Elizabeth Bos",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcw165",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1884--1902",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

Out of sight, out of mind : Ethnic inequalities in child protection and out-of-home care intervention rates. / Bywaters, Paul; Kwhali, Josephine; Brady, Geraldine; Sparks, Tim; Bos, Elizabeth.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 47, No. 7, 01.10.2017, p. 1884-1902.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Out of sight, out of mind

T2 - Ethnic inequalities in child protection and out-of-home care intervention rates

AU - Bywaters, Paul

AU - Kwhali, Josephine

AU - Brady, Geraldine

AU - Sparks, Tim

AU - Bos, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - This paper examines the interlocking roles of ethnicity and deprivation in producing inequities in the proportion of children who are subject to state child protection interventions. In contrast to the USA, ethnic inequities have had little attention in research or policy in the UK and across Europe, and administrative data are limited and methodologically weak. A study of over 10 per cent of all children on child protection plans or who were looked after in out-of-home care in England in March 2012 is reported. Children from ethnic minority categories were much more likely than ‘White’ children to be living in disadvantaged areas and this has to be taken into account when examining intervention rates. Controlling for deprivation and examining small subgroups of the broad ethnic categories radically alters the simple understanding that ‘Black’ children are overrepresented compared to White amongst children in out-of-home care, while ‘Asian’ children are under-represented. While this study could not explain these patterns, it reinforces the importance of both socio-economic circumstances and ethnicity for understanding inequities in intervention rates. The evidence underlines the powerful moral and economic case for action to reduce inequities in powerful state interventions in family life, not only in England, but internationally.

AB - This paper examines the interlocking roles of ethnicity and deprivation in producing inequities in the proportion of children who are subject to state child protection interventions. In contrast to the USA, ethnic inequities have had little attention in research or policy in the UK and across Europe, and administrative data are limited and methodologically weak. A study of over 10 per cent of all children on child protection plans or who were looked after in out-of-home care in England in March 2012 is reported. Children from ethnic minority categories were much more likely than ‘White’ children to be living in disadvantaged areas and this has to be taken into account when examining intervention rates. Controlling for deprivation and examining small subgroups of the broad ethnic categories radically alters the simple understanding that ‘Black’ children are overrepresented compared to White amongst children in out-of-home care, while ‘Asian’ children are under-represented. While this study could not explain these patterns, it reinforces the importance of both socio-economic circumstances and ethnicity for understanding inequities in intervention rates. The evidence underlines the powerful moral and economic case for action to reduce inequities in powerful state interventions in family life, not only in England, but internationally.

KW - Child protection

KW - Deprivation

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Inequalities

KW - Out-of-home care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042070865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw165

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw165

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 1884

EP - 1902

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 7

ER -