Parents' experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate

A review of the literature

P. Nelson, A. M. Glenny, S. Kirk, A. L. Caress

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review brings together for the first time the existing quantitative and qualitative research evidence about the experiences of parents caring for a child with a cleft. It summarizes salient themes on the emotional, social and service-related experiences of parents and critiques the literature to date, comparing it with wider, selected literature from the field of children's long-term conditions, including disability. The review suggests that there are similarities and differences between the literatures, in terms of research focus and approach. Similarities are found across children's conditions in the perspectives of parents on emotional, social and service-related aspects, although much of the cleft literature is focused on the early stages of children's lives. However, the quality of cleft research to date about parents' experiences has also been variable, with a narrow emphasis on cross-sectional, deficit-orientated psychological approaches focused mainly on mothers. Despite a substantial literature, little qualitative research has examined parents' perspectives in-depth, particularly about their child's treatment journey. This contrasts with the wider children's literature, which has traditionally drawn not only on psychological approaches but also on the broader perspectives of sociology, social policy, nursing and health services research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, often in integrated ways. Such approaches have been able to highlight a greater range of experiences from both mothers and fathers, about caring for a child with a long-term condition and views about treatment. The review identifies a lack of comparable research in the cleft field to examine parents' experiences and needs at different stages of their children's lives. Above all, research is needed to investigate how both mothers and fathers might experience the long-term and complex treatment journey as children become older and to elicit their views about decision making for cleft treatments, particularly elective surgeries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-20
Number of pages15
JournalChild: Care, Health and Development
Volume38
Issue number1
Early online date30 May 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cleft Lip
Cleft Palate
Parents
Social Work
Qualitative Research
Mothers
Research
Fathers
Psychology
Literature
Nursing Services
Sociology
Health Services Research
Therapeutics
Public Policy
Decision Making

Cite this

@article{f71cc69746f3478cbdaf4d298c29957f,
title = "Parents' experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: A review of the literature",
abstract = "This review brings together for the first time the existing quantitative and qualitative research evidence about the experiences of parents caring for a child with a cleft. It summarizes salient themes on the emotional, social and service-related experiences of parents and critiques the literature to date, comparing it with wider, selected literature from the field of children's long-term conditions, including disability. The review suggests that there are similarities and differences between the literatures, in terms of research focus and approach. Similarities are found across children's conditions in the perspectives of parents on emotional, social and service-related aspects, although much of the cleft literature is focused on the early stages of children's lives. However, the quality of cleft research to date about parents' experiences has also been variable, with a narrow emphasis on cross-sectional, deficit-orientated psychological approaches focused mainly on mothers. Despite a substantial literature, little qualitative research has examined parents' perspectives in-depth, particularly about their child's treatment journey. This contrasts with the wider children's literature, which has traditionally drawn not only on psychological approaches but also on the broader perspectives of sociology, social policy, nursing and health services research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, often in integrated ways. Such approaches have been able to highlight a greater range of experiences from both mothers and fathers, about caring for a child with a long-term condition and views about treatment. The review identifies a lack of comparable research in the cleft field to examine parents' experiences and needs at different stages of their children's lives. Above all, research is needed to investigate how both mothers and fathers might experience the long-term and complex treatment journey as children become older and to elicit their views about decision making for cleft treatments, particularly elective surgeries.",
keywords = "Cleft lip, Cleft palate, Parents' experiences, Parents' perceptions",
author = "P. Nelson and Glenny, {A. M.} and S. Kirk and Caress, {A. L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01244.x",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "6--20",
journal = "Child: Care, Health and Development",
issn = "0305-1862",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Parents' experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate : A review of the literature. / Nelson, P.; Glenny, A. M.; Kirk, S.; Caress, A. L.

In: Child: Care, Health and Development, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 6-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parents' experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate

T2 - A review of the literature

AU - Nelson, P.

AU - Glenny, A. M.

AU - Kirk, S.

AU - Caress, A. L.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - This review brings together for the first time the existing quantitative and qualitative research evidence about the experiences of parents caring for a child with a cleft. It summarizes salient themes on the emotional, social and service-related experiences of parents and critiques the literature to date, comparing it with wider, selected literature from the field of children's long-term conditions, including disability. The review suggests that there are similarities and differences between the literatures, in terms of research focus and approach. Similarities are found across children's conditions in the perspectives of parents on emotional, social and service-related aspects, although much of the cleft literature is focused on the early stages of children's lives. However, the quality of cleft research to date about parents' experiences has also been variable, with a narrow emphasis on cross-sectional, deficit-orientated psychological approaches focused mainly on mothers. Despite a substantial literature, little qualitative research has examined parents' perspectives in-depth, particularly about their child's treatment journey. This contrasts with the wider children's literature, which has traditionally drawn not only on psychological approaches but also on the broader perspectives of sociology, social policy, nursing and health services research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, often in integrated ways. Such approaches have been able to highlight a greater range of experiences from both mothers and fathers, about caring for a child with a long-term condition and views about treatment. The review identifies a lack of comparable research in the cleft field to examine parents' experiences and needs at different stages of their children's lives. Above all, research is needed to investigate how both mothers and fathers might experience the long-term and complex treatment journey as children become older and to elicit their views about decision making for cleft treatments, particularly elective surgeries.

AB - This review brings together for the first time the existing quantitative and qualitative research evidence about the experiences of parents caring for a child with a cleft. It summarizes salient themes on the emotional, social and service-related experiences of parents and critiques the literature to date, comparing it with wider, selected literature from the field of children's long-term conditions, including disability. The review suggests that there are similarities and differences between the literatures, in terms of research focus and approach. Similarities are found across children's conditions in the perspectives of parents on emotional, social and service-related aspects, although much of the cleft literature is focused on the early stages of children's lives. However, the quality of cleft research to date about parents' experiences has also been variable, with a narrow emphasis on cross-sectional, deficit-orientated psychological approaches focused mainly on mothers. Despite a substantial literature, little qualitative research has examined parents' perspectives in-depth, particularly about their child's treatment journey. This contrasts with the wider children's literature, which has traditionally drawn not only on psychological approaches but also on the broader perspectives of sociology, social policy, nursing and health services research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, often in integrated ways. Such approaches have been able to highlight a greater range of experiences from both mothers and fathers, about caring for a child with a long-term condition and views about treatment. The review identifies a lack of comparable research in the cleft field to examine parents' experiences and needs at different stages of their children's lives. Above all, research is needed to investigate how both mothers and fathers might experience the long-term and complex treatment journey as children become older and to elicit their views about decision making for cleft treatments, particularly elective surgeries.

KW - Cleft lip

KW - Cleft palate

KW - Parents' experiences

KW - Parents' perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155164976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01244.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01244.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 38

SP - 6

EP - 20

JO - Child: Care, Health and Development

JF - Child: Care, Health and Development

SN - 0305-1862

IS - 1

ER -