Patient and public involvement in research and the Cancer Experiences Collaborative

Benefits and challenges

Katherine Froggatt, Nancy Preston, Mary Turner, Chris Kerr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and objectives The involvement of patients in the design and conduct of research is increasingly promoted by policy and research bodies. The experiences of individuals who become involved in research in this way are not well understood. This study aims to describe the experiences of people's participation in patient and public involvement (PPI) in supportive and palliative care research, specifically with respect to the benefits and challenges of participation for the individuals and the broader research support structures. Methods In this qualitative exploratory study, semistructured interviews were undertaken with individuals who had a cancer diagnosis and were involved in a supportive and palliative care research collaborative over a period of 6 years. Recruitment was through the host university organisations involved in the research collaborative. A thematic analysis was undertaken to identify commonalities and differences across their experiences. Findings The eight participants in the study were highly motivated and undertook PPI in research alongside other voluntary activities. They identified a number of research and personal benefits: bringing a lay perspective into research, making a difference and personal gains. Personal gains concerned support, new knowledge and skills and greater confidence. The challenges to participation that were identified included the emotional and practical nature of the work, issues of language and identifying the difference made. Conclusions Involvement in supportive and palliative care research is valued by people with a cancer diagnosis, but there are ongoing issues of emotional support and good communication through the use of appropriate language in documentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)518-521
Number of pages4
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume5
Issue number5
Early online date11 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research
Neoplasms
Palliative Care
Language
Patient Participation
Documentation
Research Design
Communication
Organizations
Interviews

Cite this

@article{f8e8906d2f6c4a869198ee4bae1e2750,
title = "Patient and public involvement in research and the Cancer Experiences Collaborative: Benefits and challenges",
abstract = "Aims and objectives The involvement of patients in the design and conduct of research is increasingly promoted by policy and research bodies. The experiences of individuals who become involved in research in this way are not well understood. This study aims to describe the experiences of people's participation in patient and public involvement (PPI) in supportive and palliative care research, specifically with respect to the benefits and challenges of participation for the individuals and the broader research support structures. Methods In this qualitative exploratory study, semistructured interviews were undertaken with individuals who had a cancer diagnosis and were involved in a supportive and palliative care research collaborative over a period of 6 years. Recruitment was through the host university organisations involved in the research collaborative. A thematic analysis was undertaken to identify commonalities and differences across their experiences. Findings The eight participants in the study were highly motivated and undertook PPI in research alongside other voluntary activities. They identified a number of research and personal benefits: bringing a lay perspective into research, making a difference and personal gains. Personal gains concerned support, new knowledge and skills and greater confidence. The challenges to participation that were identified included the emotional and practical nature of the work, issues of language and identifying the difference made. Conclusions Involvement in supportive and palliative care research is valued by people with a cancer diagnosis, but there are ongoing issues of emotional support and good communication through the use of appropriate language in documentation.",
author = "Katherine Froggatt and Nancy Preston and Mary Turner and Chris Kerr",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000548",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "518--521",
journal = "BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "2045-435X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

Patient and public involvement in research and the Cancer Experiences Collaborative : Benefits and challenges. / Froggatt, Katherine; Preston, Nancy; Turner, Mary; Kerr, Chris.

In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, Vol. 5, No. 5, 01.12.2015, p. 518-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and public involvement in research and the Cancer Experiences Collaborative

T2 - Benefits and challenges

AU - Froggatt, Katherine

AU - Preston, Nancy

AU - Turner, Mary

AU - Kerr, Chris

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Aims and objectives The involvement of patients in the design and conduct of research is increasingly promoted by policy and research bodies. The experiences of individuals who become involved in research in this way are not well understood. This study aims to describe the experiences of people's participation in patient and public involvement (PPI) in supportive and palliative care research, specifically with respect to the benefits and challenges of participation for the individuals and the broader research support structures. Methods In this qualitative exploratory study, semistructured interviews were undertaken with individuals who had a cancer diagnosis and were involved in a supportive and palliative care research collaborative over a period of 6 years. Recruitment was through the host university organisations involved in the research collaborative. A thematic analysis was undertaken to identify commonalities and differences across their experiences. Findings The eight participants in the study were highly motivated and undertook PPI in research alongside other voluntary activities. They identified a number of research and personal benefits: bringing a lay perspective into research, making a difference and personal gains. Personal gains concerned support, new knowledge and skills and greater confidence. The challenges to participation that were identified included the emotional and practical nature of the work, issues of language and identifying the difference made. Conclusions Involvement in supportive and palliative care research is valued by people with a cancer diagnosis, but there are ongoing issues of emotional support and good communication through the use of appropriate language in documentation.

AB - Aims and objectives The involvement of patients in the design and conduct of research is increasingly promoted by policy and research bodies. The experiences of individuals who become involved in research in this way are not well understood. This study aims to describe the experiences of people's participation in patient and public involvement (PPI) in supportive and palliative care research, specifically with respect to the benefits and challenges of participation for the individuals and the broader research support structures. Methods In this qualitative exploratory study, semistructured interviews were undertaken with individuals who had a cancer diagnosis and were involved in a supportive and palliative care research collaborative over a period of 6 years. Recruitment was through the host university organisations involved in the research collaborative. A thematic analysis was undertaken to identify commonalities and differences across their experiences. Findings The eight participants in the study were highly motivated and undertook PPI in research alongside other voluntary activities. They identified a number of research and personal benefits: bringing a lay perspective into research, making a difference and personal gains. Personal gains concerned support, new knowledge and skills and greater confidence. The challenges to participation that were identified included the emotional and practical nature of the work, issues of language and identifying the difference made. Conclusions Involvement in supportive and palliative care research is valued by people with a cancer diagnosis, but there are ongoing issues of emotional support and good communication through the use of appropriate language in documentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949472622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000548

DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000548

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 518

EP - 521

JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 2045-435X

IS - 5

ER -