Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge: Reflection on the Analysis of Qualitative Data in a Mental Health Study

Steve Gillard, Lucy Simons, Kati Turner, Mike Lucock, Christine Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient and public involvement in health research is increasingly well established internationally, but the impacts of involvement on the research process are hard to evaluate. We describe a process of qualitative data analysis in a mental health research project with a high level of mental health service user and carer involvement, and reflect critically on how we produced our findings. Team members not from research backgrounds sometimes challenged academic conventions, leading to complex findings that would otherwise have been missing. An essential component of how we coproduced knowledge involved retaining methodological flexibility so that nonconventional research voices in the team could situate and critique what was conventionally known. Deliberate and transparent reflection on how "who we are" informed the knowledge we produced was integral to our inquiry. We conclude that reflecting on knowledge (co)production is a useful tool for evaluating the impact of patient and public involvement on health research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1126-1137
Number of pages12
JournalQualitative Health Research
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Research
Health
Mental Health Services
Caregivers
Health Status

Cite this

@article{2972a511252a4ac7aacf9e60e0982e98,
title = "Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge: Reflection on the Analysis of Qualitative Data in a Mental Health Study",
abstract = "Patient and public involvement in health research is increasingly well established internationally, but the impacts of involvement on the research process are hard to evaluate. We describe a process of qualitative data analysis in a mental health research project with a high level of mental health service user and carer involvement, and reflect critically on how we produced our findings. Team members not from research backgrounds sometimes challenged academic conventions, leading to complex findings that would otherwise have been missing. An essential component of how we coproduced knowledge involved retaining methodological flexibility so that nonconventional research voices in the team could situate and critique what was conventionally known. Deliberate and transparent reflection on how {"}who we are{"} informed the knowledge we produced was integral to our inquiry. We conclude that reflecting on knowledge (co)production is a useful tool for evaluating the impact of patient and public involvement on health research.",
keywords = "Epistemology, Health care, users' experiences, Interpretive methods, Knowledge construction, Mental health and illness, Qualitative analysis, Reflexivity, Research participation, Self-care",
author = "Steve Gillard and Lucy Simons and Kati Turner and Mike Lucock and Christine Edwards",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/1049732312448541",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1126--1137",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1049-7323",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "8",

}

Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge : Reflection on the Analysis of Qualitative Data in a Mental Health Study. / Gillard, Steve; Simons, Lucy; Turner, Kati; Lucock, Mike; Edwards, Christine.

In: Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2012, p. 1126-1137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge

T2 - Reflection on the Analysis of Qualitative Data in a Mental Health Study

AU - Gillard, Steve

AU - Simons, Lucy

AU - Turner, Kati

AU - Lucock, Mike

AU - Edwards, Christine

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Patient and public involvement in health research is increasingly well established internationally, but the impacts of involvement on the research process are hard to evaluate. We describe a process of qualitative data analysis in a mental health research project with a high level of mental health service user and carer involvement, and reflect critically on how we produced our findings. Team members not from research backgrounds sometimes challenged academic conventions, leading to complex findings that would otherwise have been missing. An essential component of how we coproduced knowledge involved retaining methodological flexibility so that nonconventional research voices in the team could situate and critique what was conventionally known. Deliberate and transparent reflection on how "who we are" informed the knowledge we produced was integral to our inquiry. We conclude that reflecting on knowledge (co)production is a useful tool for evaluating the impact of patient and public involvement on health research.

AB - Patient and public involvement in health research is increasingly well established internationally, but the impacts of involvement on the research process are hard to evaluate. We describe a process of qualitative data analysis in a mental health research project with a high level of mental health service user and carer involvement, and reflect critically on how we produced our findings. Team members not from research backgrounds sometimes challenged academic conventions, leading to complex findings that would otherwise have been missing. An essential component of how we coproduced knowledge involved retaining methodological flexibility so that nonconventional research voices in the team could situate and critique what was conventionally known. Deliberate and transparent reflection on how "who we are" informed the knowledge we produced was integral to our inquiry. We conclude that reflecting on knowledge (co)production is a useful tool for evaluating the impact of patient and public involvement on health research.

KW - Epistemology

KW - Health care, users' experiences

KW - Interpretive methods

KW - Knowledge construction

KW - Mental health and illness

KW - Qualitative analysis

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Research participation

KW - Self-care

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/qhr

U2 - 10.1177/1049732312448541

DO - 10.1177/1049732312448541

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1126

EP - 1137

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1049-7323

IS - 8

ER -