TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient Perspectives on Factors Affecting Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
AU - Medlinskiene, Kristina
AU - Richardson, Sue
AU - Fylan, Beth
AU - Stirling, Katherine
AU - Rattray, Marcus
AU - Petty, Duncan
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support for this study was provided entirely by a grant from the Pharmacy Research UK (PRUK-2018-GA-1-KM) and Leeds T eaching Hospitals NHS T rust. The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study , interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Pharmacy Research UK or Leeds T eaching Hospitals NHS T rust.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Medlinskiene et al.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5/10
Y1 - 2021/5/10
N2 - Introduction: Oral anticoagulant therapy choices for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) expanded in the last decade with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). However, the implementation of DOACs was slow and varied across different health economies in England. There is limited evidence on the patient role in the uptake of new medicines, including DOACs, apart from considering their demographic and clinical char-acteristics. Hence, this study aimed to address the gap by exploring the view of patients with AF on factors affecting DOAC use. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted in three health economies in the North of England. Adult patients (>18 years) diagnosed with nonvalvular AF, prescribed an oral anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonist or DOAC), and able to give written consent were recruited. Data were collected between August 2018 and April 2019. Audio recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the framework method. Results: Four themes with eleven subthemes discussed identified factors affecting the use of DOACs. They were linked to limited healthcare financial and workforce resources, patient involvement in decision-making, patient knowledge about DOACs, safety concerns about oral anticoagulants, and oral anticoagulant therapy impact on patients’ daily lives. Lack of a) opportunities to voice patient preferences and b) information on available therapy options resulted in some patients experiencing difficulties with the prescribed therapy. This was reported to cause negative impact on their daily lives, adherence, and overall satisfaction with the therapy. Conclusion: Greater patient involvement in decision-making could prevent and resolve difficulties encountered by some patients and potentially improve outcomes plus increase the uptake of DOACs.
AB - Introduction: Oral anticoagulant therapy choices for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) expanded in the last decade with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). However, the implementation of DOACs was slow and varied across different health economies in England. There is limited evidence on the patient role in the uptake of new medicines, including DOACs, apart from considering their demographic and clinical char-acteristics. Hence, this study aimed to address the gap by exploring the view of patients with AF on factors affecting DOAC use. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted in three health economies in the North of England. Adult patients (>18 years) diagnosed with nonvalvular AF, prescribed an oral anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonist or DOAC), and able to give written consent were recruited. Data were collected between August 2018 and April 2019. Audio recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the framework method. Results: Four themes with eleven subthemes discussed identified factors affecting the use of DOACs. They were linked to limited healthcare financial and workforce resources, patient involvement in decision-making, patient knowledge about DOACs, safety concerns about oral anticoagulants, and oral anticoagulant therapy impact on patients’ daily lives. Lack of a) opportunities to voice patient preferences and b) information on available therapy options resulted in some patients experiencing difficulties with the prescribed therapy. This was reported to cause negative impact on their daily lives, adherence, and overall satisfaction with the therapy. Conclusion: Greater patient involvement in decision-making could prevent and resolve difficulties encountered by some patients and potentially improve outcomes plus increase the uptake of DOACs.
KW - Uptake
KW - New medicines
KW - Shared decision making
KW - Direct oral anticoagulants
KW - DOACs
KW - Warfarin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106907980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/PPA.S302016
DO - 10.2147/PPA.S302016
M3 - Article
C2 - 34007161
VL - 15
SP - 953
EP - 966
JO - Patient Preference and Adherence
JF - Patient Preference and Adherence
SN - 1177-889X
ER -