Peace Dividends

The Exclusion of Military Contractors from Investment Portfolios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are many ways in which opposition to, or distaste for, the production of armaments and other equipment used for military purposes can be expressed. The purpose of this paper is to introduce to the peace studies literature the possibility that such views can find expression in the construction of equity investment portfolios. In particular, the paper examines the relative importance of military contracting as one area of possible concern to `ethical' or `socially responsible' investors in Britain. First, it is found that virtually all the managed investment funds marketed to British investors as possessing ethical characteristics make some exclusion on the basis of involvement in military contracting. The various ways in which military contracting is defined by the funds are outlined and discussed. The second substantive section of the paper then examines the attitudes of 125 users of an ethical information service and finds that military contracting is one of the highest ranked categories, but that the concern is primarily with the supply of non-civilian rather than civilian items. The discussion then briefly considers: experience in, and prospects for, other countries; further possible definitions of unacceptable military contractors; and some of the implications for the composition of equity portfolios.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-28
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contractors
peace
exclusion
Military
Information services
investor
equity
Chemical analysis
armaments
information service
opposition
supply
experience

Cite this

@article{a15dcd66b3704899a9d1439d1f4da3bd,
title = "Peace Dividends: The Exclusion of Military Contractors from Investment Portfolios",
abstract = "There are many ways in which opposition to, or distaste for, the production of armaments and other equipment used for military purposes can be expressed. The purpose of this paper is to introduce to the peace studies literature the possibility that such views can find expression in the construction of equity investment portfolios. In particular, the paper examines the relative importance of military contracting as one area of possible concern to `ethical' or `socially responsible' investors in Britain. First, it is found that virtually all the managed investment funds marketed to British investors as possessing ethical characteristics make some exclusion on the basis of involvement in military contracting. The various ways in which military contracting is defined by the funds are outlined and discussed. The second substantive section of the paper then examines the attitudes of 125 users of an ethical information service and finds that military contracting is one of the highest ranked categories, but that the concern is primarily with the supply of non-civilian rather than civilian items. The discussion then briefly considers: experience in, and prospects for, other countries; further possible definitions of unacceptable military contractors; and some of the implications for the composition of equity portfolios.",
author = "Christopher Cowton",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1177/0022343393030001003",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "21--28",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Peace Dividends : The Exclusion of Military Contractors from Investment Portfolios. / Cowton, Christopher.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1993, p. 21-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peace Dividends

T2 - The Exclusion of Military Contractors from Investment Portfolios

AU - Cowton, Christopher

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - There are many ways in which opposition to, or distaste for, the production of armaments and other equipment used for military purposes can be expressed. The purpose of this paper is to introduce to the peace studies literature the possibility that such views can find expression in the construction of equity investment portfolios. In particular, the paper examines the relative importance of military contracting as one area of possible concern to `ethical' or `socially responsible' investors in Britain. First, it is found that virtually all the managed investment funds marketed to British investors as possessing ethical characteristics make some exclusion on the basis of involvement in military contracting. The various ways in which military contracting is defined by the funds are outlined and discussed. The second substantive section of the paper then examines the attitudes of 125 users of an ethical information service and finds that military contracting is one of the highest ranked categories, but that the concern is primarily with the supply of non-civilian rather than civilian items. The discussion then briefly considers: experience in, and prospects for, other countries; further possible definitions of unacceptable military contractors; and some of the implications for the composition of equity portfolios.

AB - There are many ways in which opposition to, or distaste for, the production of armaments and other equipment used for military purposes can be expressed. The purpose of this paper is to introduce to the peace studies literature the possibility that such views can find expression in the construction of equity investment portfolios. In particular, the paper examines the relative importance of military contracting as one area of possible concern to `ethical' or `socially responsible' investors in Britain. First, it is found that virtually all the managed investment funds marketed to British investors as possessing ethical characteristics make some exclusion on the basis of involvement in military contracting. The various ways in which military contracting is defined by the funds are outlined and discussed. The second substantive section of the paper then examines the attitudes of 125 users of an ethical information service and finds that military contracting is one of the highest ranked categories, but that the concern is primarily with the supply of non-civilian rather than civilian items. The discussion then briefly considers: experience in, and prospects for, other countries; further possible definitions of unacceptable military contractors; and some of the implications for the composition of equity portfolios.

U2 - 10.1177/0022343393030001003

DO - 10.1177/0022343393030001003

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 21

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 1

ER -