Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness

Wai Tong Chien, Andrew Clifton, Sai Zhao, Sun Chong Lui

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Peer support provides the opportunity for peers with experiential knowledge of a mental illness to give emotional, appraisal and informational assistance to current service users, and is becoming an important recovery-oriented approach in healthcare for people with mental illness. Objectives To assess the effects of peer-support interventions for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental disorders, compared to standard care or other supportive or psychosocial interventions not from peers. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials on 27 July 2016 and 4 July 2017. There were no limitations regarding language, date, document type or publication status. Selection criteria We selected all randomised controlled clinical studies involving people diagnosed with schizophrenia or other related serious mental illness that compared peer support to standard care or other psychosocial interventions and that did not involve 'peer' individual/ group(s). We included studies that met our inclusion criteria and reported useable data. Our primary outcomes were service use and global state (relapse). Data collection and analysis The authors of this review complied with the Cochrane recommended standard of conduct for data screening and collection. Two review authors independently screened the studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion until the authors reached a consensus. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary data, and the mean difference and its 95% CI for continuous data. We used a random-effects model for analyses.We assessed the quality of evidence and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD010880
Number of pages149
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume2019
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Confidence Intervals
Peer Group
Mental Disorders
Patient Selection
Publications
Consensus
Language
Odds Ratio
Delivery of Health Care
Recurrence
Clinical Studies

Cite this

@article{13a91faf453a4ed9b1dc1432621eb87c,
title = "Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness",
abstract = "Background Peer support provides the opportunity for peers with experiential knowledge of a mental illness to give emotional, appraisal and informational assistance to current service users, and is becoming an important recovery-oriented approach in healthcare for people with mental illness. Objectives To assess the effects of peer-support interventions for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental disorders, compared to standard care or other supportive or psychosocial interventions not from peers. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials on 27 July 2016 and 4 July 2017. There were no limitations regarding language, date, document type or publication status. Selection criteria We selected all randomised controlled clinical studies involving people diagnosed with schizophrenia or other related serious mental illness that compared peer support to standard care or other psychosocial interventions and that did not involve 'peer' individual/ group(s). We included studies that met our inclusion criteria and reported useable data. Our primary outcomes were service use and global state (relapse). Data collection and analysis The authors of this review complied with the Cochrane recommended standard of conduct for data screening and collection. Two review authors independently screened the studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion until the authors reached a consensus. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) for binary data, and the mean difference and its 95{\%} CI for continuous data. We used a random-effects model for analyses.We assessed the quality of evidence and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach.",
keywords = "Peer support, Schizophrenia",
author = "Chien, {Wai Tong} and Andrew Clifton and Sai Zhao and Lui, {Sun Chong}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD010880.pub2",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",
issn = "1361-6137",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness. / Chien, Wai Tong; Clifton, Andrew; Zhao, Sai ; Lui, Sun Chong .

In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 2019, No. 4, CD010880, 04.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness

AU - Chien, Wai Tong

AU - Clifton, Andrew

AU - Zhao, Sai

AU - Lui, Sun Chong

PY - 2019/4/4

Y1 - 2019/4/4

N2 - Background Peer support provides the opportunity for peers with experiential knowledge of a mental illness to give emotional, appraisal and informational assistance to current service users, and is becoming an important recovery-oriented approach in healthcare for people with mental illness. Objectives To assess the effects of peer-support interventions for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental disorders, compared to standard care or other supportive or psychosocial interventions not from peers. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials on 27 July 2016 and 4 July 2017. There were no limitations regarding language, date, document type or publication status. Selection criteria We selected all randomised controlled clinical studies involving people diagnosed with schizophrenia or other related serious mental illness that compared peer support to standard care or other psychosocial interventions and that did not involve 'peer' individual/ group(s). We included studies that met our inclusion criteria and reported useable data. Our primary outcomes were service use and global state (relapse). Data collection and analysis The authors of this review complied with the Cochrane recommended standard of conduct for data screening and collection. Two review authors independently screened the studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion until the authors reached a consensus. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary data, and the mean difference and its 95% CI for continuous data. We used a random-effects model for analyses.We assessed the quality of evidence and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach.

AB - Background Peer support provides the opportunity for peers with experiential knowledge of a mental illness to give emotional, appraisal and informational assistance to current service users, and is becoming an important recovery-oriented approach in healthcare for people with mental illness. Objectives To assess the effects of peer-support interventions for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental disorders, compared to standard care or other supportive or psychosocial interventions not from peers. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials on 27 July 2016 and 4 July 2017. There were no limitations regarding language, date, document type or publication status. Selection criteria We selected all randomised controlled clinical studies involving people diagnosed with schizophrenia or other related serious mental illness that compared peer support to standard care or other psychosocial interventions and that did not involve 'peer' individual/ group(s). We included studies that met our inclusion criteria and reported useable data. Our primary outcomes were service use and global state (relapse). Data collection and analysis The authors of this review complied with the Cochrane recommended standard of conduct for data screening and collection. Two review authors independently screened the studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion until the authors reached a consensus. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary data, and the mean difference and its 95% CI for continuous data. We used a random-effects model for analyses.We assessed the quality of evidence and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach.

KW - Peer support

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064044037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD010880.pub2

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD010880.pub2

M3 - Review article

VL - 2019

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

SN - 1361-6137

IS - 4

M1 - CD010880

ER -