Pitfalls, perils and payments: Service user, carers and teaching staff perceptions of the barriers to involvement in nursing education

Shaun Speed, Jane Griffiths, Maria Horne, Philip Keeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is an impetus to involve service users and carers in the education of nurses and a general consensus in the literature about the benefits that this brings to all involved. Whilst these benefits are well rehearsed in the literature there is little written about the potential barriers to service user and carer involvement in nurse education. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate service users, carers and staff views on the potential barriers to becoming engaged in nurse education. Design: A qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGD) was used to canvas the views of service users, carers and teaching staff. Setting: A large school of nursing in the North West of England. Participants: 38 service users and carers recruited from the North West of England and 23 nursing and midwifery teachers and lecturers. Methods: Focus group discussions were employed as the main data collection method. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Six themes occurred in the data as being negatively associated with potential and actual involvement: not knowing the context of the group, lack of preparation of the group, not being supported, not being allowed to be real, not receiving feedback, not being paid appropriately. Conclusions: The process of involvement is not without difficulties. These data show that some consideration needs to be given to the potential barriers to involvement if the engagement of service users and carers is to be effective.

LanguageEnglish
Pages829-834
Number of pages6
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing Education
Caregivers
Teaching
nursing
education
nurse
Nurses
Focus Groups
Education
England
group discussion
School Nursing
data collection method
Midwifery
Nursing
university teacher
Group
staff
lack
teacher

Cite this

Speed, Shaun ; Griffiths, Jane ; Horne, Maria ; Keeley, Philip. / Pitfalls, perils and payments : Service user, carers and teaching staff perceptions of the barriers to involvement in nursing education. In: Nurse Education Today. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 829-834.
@article{7ef04aeb99d44dcaba2737feeb1ae209,
title = "Pitfalls, perils and payments: Service user, carers and teaching staff perceptions of the barriers to involvement in nursing education",
abstract = "Background: There is an impetus to involve service users and carers in the education of nurses and a general consensus in the literature about the benefits that this brings to all involved. Whilst these benefits are well rehearsed in the literature there is little written about the potential barriers to service user and carer involvement in nurse education. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate service users, carers and staff views on the potential barriers to becoming engaged in nurse education. Design: A qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGD) was used to canvas the views of service users, carers and teaching staff. Setting: A large school of nursing in the North West of England. Participants: 38 service users and carers recruited from the North West of England and 23 nursing and midwifery teachers and lecturers. Methods: Focus group discussions were employed as the main data collection method. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Six themes occurred in the data as being negatively associated with potential and actual involvement: not knowing the context of the group, lack of preparation of the group, not being supported, not being allowed to be real, not receiving feedback, not being paid appropriately. Conclusions: The process of involvement is not without difficulties. These data show that some consideration needs to be given to the potential barriers to involvement if the engagement of service users and carers is to be effective.",
keywords = "Barriers, Carers, Involvement, Nurse education, Service users",
author = "Shaun Speed and Jane Griffiths and Maria Horne and Philip Keeley",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.013",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "829--834",
journal = "Nurse Education Today",
issn = "0260-6917",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

Pitfalls, perils and payments : Service user, carers and teaching staff perceptions of the barriers to involvement in nursing education. / Speed, Shaun; Griffiths, Jane; Horne, Maria; Keeley, Philip.

In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.10.2012, p. 829-834.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pitfalls, perils and payments

T2 - Nurse Education Today

AU - Speed, Shaun

AU - Griffiths, Jane

AU - Horne, Maria

AU - Keeley, Philip

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Background: There is an impetus to involve service users and carers in the education of nurses and a general consensus in the literature about the benefits that this brings to all involved. Whilst these benefits are well rehearsed in the literature there is little written about the potential barriers to service user and carer involvement in nurse education. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate service users, carers and staff views on the potential barriers to becoming engaged in nurse education. Design: A qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGD) was used to canvas the views of service users, carers and teaching staff. Setting: A large school of nursing in the North West of England. Participants: 38 service users and carers recruited from the North West of England and 23 nursing and midwifery teachers and lecturers. Methods: Focus group discussions were employed as the main data collection method. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Six themes occurred in the data as being negatively associated with potential and actual involvement: not knowing the context of the group, lack of preparation of the group, not being supported, not being allowed to be real, not receiving feedback, not being paid appropriately. Conclusions: The process of involvement is not without difficulties. These data show that some consideration needs to be given to the potential barriers to involvement if the engagement of service users and carers is to be effective.

AB - Background: There is an impetus to involve service users and carers in the education of nurses and a general consensus in the literature about the benefits that this brings to all involved. Whilst these benefits are well rehearsed in the literature there is little written about the potential barriers to service user and carer involvement in nurse education. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate service users, carers and staff views on the potential barriers to becoming engaged in nurse education. Design: A qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGD) was used to canvas the views of service users, carers and teaching staff. Setting: A large school of nursing in the North West of England. Participants: 38 service users and carers recruited from the North West of England and 23 nursing and midwifery teachers and lecturers. Methods: Focus group discussions were employed as the main data collection method. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Six themes occurred in the data as being negatively associated with potential and actual involvement: not knowing the context of the group, lack of preparation of the group, not being supported, not being allowed to be real, not receiving feedback, not being paid appropriately. Conclusions: The process of involvement is not without difficulties. These data show that some consideration needs to be given to the potential barriers to involvement if the engagement of service users and carers is to be effective.

KW - Barriers

KW - Carers

KW - Involvement

KW - Nurse education

KW - Service users

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864503299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.013

DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.013

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 829

EP - 834

JO - Nurse Education Today

JF - Nurse Education Today

SN - 0260-6917

IS - 7

ER -