Planning and Controlling Design in Engineered-to-Order Prefabricated Building Systems

Josana Wesz, Carlos Torres Formoso, Patricia Tzortzopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a model for planning and controlling the design process in companies that design, manufacture and assemble prefabricated engineer-to-order (ETO) building systems. This model was devised as an adaptation of the Last Planner® System for ETO multiple-project environments.

Design/methodology/approach – Design science research, also known as prescriptive research, was the methodological approach adopted in this research. An empirical study was carried out at the design department of a leading steel fabricator from Brazil, in which the proposed model was implemented in six different design teams.

Findings – The main benefits of the proposed model were shielding design work from variability, encouraging collaborative planning, creating opportunities for learning, increasing process transparency, and
flexibility according to project status. Two main factors affected the effectiveness of the implementation process commitment and leadership of design managers, and training on design management and project planning and control core concepts and practices.

Research limitations/implications – Some limitations were identified in the implementation process:
similarly to some previous studies (Ballard, 2002; Codinhoto and Formoso, 2005), the success of constraint analysis was still limited; some of the metrics produced (e.g. ABI, causes of planning failures) have not been fully used for process improvement; and systematic feedback about project status was not properly implemented and tested.

Originality/value – The main contributions of this study in relation to traditional design planning and control practices are related to the use of two levels of look-ahead planning, the introduction of a decoupling point between conceptual and detail design, the proposition of new metrics for the Last Planner® System, and understanding the potential role of visual management to support planning and control.
LanguageEnglish
Pages134-152
Number of pages19
JournalEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Prefabricated construction
Planning
Engineers
Shielding
Transparency

Cite this

@article{09f694041be64818aa50e68d101b01a4,
title = "Planning and Controlling Design in Engineered-to-Order Prefabricated Building Systems",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a model for planning and controlling the design process in companies that design, manufacture and assemble prefabricated engineer-to-order (ETO) building systems. This model was devised as an adaptation of the Last Planner{\circledR} System for ETO multiple-project environments.Design/methodology/approach – Design science research, also known as prescriptive research, was the methodological approach adopted in this research. An empirical study was carried out at the design department of a leading steel fabricator from Brazil, in which the proposed model was implemented in six different design teams.Findings – The main benefits of the proposed model were shielding design work from variability, encouraging collaborative planning, creating opportunities for learning, increasing process transparency, andflexibility according to project status. Two main factors affected the effectiveness of the implementation process commitment and leadership of design managers, and training on design management and project planning and control core concepts and practices.Research limitations/implications – Some limitations were identified in the implementation process:similarly to some previous studies (Ballard, 2002; Codinhoto and Formoso, 2005), the success of constraint analysis was still limited; some of the metrics produced (e.g. ABI, causes of planning failures) have not been fully used for process improvement; and systematic feedback about project status was not properly implemented and tested.Originality/value – The main contributions of this study in relation to traditional design planning and control practices are related to the use of two levels of look-ahead planning, the introduction of a decoupling point between conceptual and detail design, the proposition of new metrics for the Last Planner{\circledR} System, and understanding the potential role of visual management to support planning and control.",
keywords = "Design process, Planning and control, Engineer-to-order, Last Planner System, Design teams, Prefabricated building systems, Last planner system",
author = "Josana Wesz and Formoso, {Carlos Torres} and Patricia Tzortzopoulos",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1108/ECAM-02-2016-0045",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "134--152",
journal = "Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management",
issn = "0969-9988",
publisher = "MCB UP Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Planning and Controlling Design in Engineered-to-Order Prefabricated Building Systems. / Wesz, Josana; Formoso, Carlos Torres; Tzortzopoulos, Patricia.

In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, 19.03.2018, p. 134-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planning and Controlling Design in Engineered-to-Order Prefabricated Building Systems

AU - Wesz, Josana

AU - Formoso, Carlos Torres

AU - Tzortzopoulos, Patricia

PY - 2018/3/19

Y1 - 2018/3/19

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a model for planning and controlling the design process in companies that design, manufacture and assemble prefabricated engineer-to-order (ETO) building systems. This model was devised as an adaptation of the Last Planner® System for ETO multiple-project environments.Design/methodology/approach – Design science research, also known as prescriptive research, was the methodological approach adopted in this research. An empirical study was carried out at the design department of a leading steel fabricator from Brazil, in which the proposed model was implemented in six different design teams.Findings – The main benefits of the proposed model were shielding design work from variability, encouraging collaborative planning, creating opportunities for learning, increasing process transparency, andflexibility according to project status. Two main factors affected the effectiveness of the implementation process commitment and leadership of design managers, and training on design management and project planning and control core concepts and practices.Research limitations/implications – Some limitations were identified in the implementation process:similarly to some previous studies (Ballard, 2002; Codinhoto and Formoso, 2005), the success of constraint analysis was still limited; some of the metrics produced (e.g. ABI, causes of planning failures) have not been fully used for process improvement; and systematic feedback about project status was not properly implemented and tested.Originality/value – The main contributions of this study in relation to traditional design planning and control practices are related to the use of two levels of look-ahead planning, the introduction of a decoupling point between conceptual and detail design, the proposition of new metrics for the Last Planner® System, and understanding the potential role of visual management to support planning and control.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a model for planning and controlling the design process in companies that design, manufacture and assemble prefabricated engineer-to-order (ETO) building systems. This model was devised as an adaptation of the Last Planner® System for ETO multiple-project environments.Design/methodology/approach – Design science research, also known as prescriptive research, was the methodological approach adopted in this research. An empirical study was carried out at the design department of a leading steel fabricator from Brazil, in which the proposed model was implemented in six different design teams.Findings – The main benefits of the proposed model were shielding design work from variability, encouraging collaborative planning, creating opportunities for learning, increasing process transparency, andflexibility according to project status. Two main factors affected the effectiveness of the implementation process commitment and leadership of design managers, and training on design management and project planning and control core concepts and practices.Research limitations/implications – Some limitations were identified in the implementation process:similarly to some previous studies (Ballard, 2002; Codinhoto and Formoso, 2005), the success of constraint analysis was still limited; some of the metrics produced (e.g. ABI, causes of planning failures) have not been fully used for process improvement; and systematic feedback about project status was not properly implemented and tested.Originality/value – The main contributions of this study in relation to traditional design planning and control practices are related to the use of two levels of look-ahead planning, the introduction of a decoupling point between conceptual and detail design, the proposition of new metrics for the Last Planner® System, and understanding the potential role of visual management to support planning and control.

KW - Design process

KW - Planning and control

KW - Engineer-to-order

KW - Last Planner System

KW - Design teams

KW - Prefabricated building systems

KW - Last planner system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047326797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-02-2016-0045

DO - 10.1108/ECAM-02-2016-0045

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 134

EP - 152

JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

T2 - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

JF - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

SN - 0969-9988

IS - 2

ER -